• Home
  • Blog rules

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« For the record…
Learning from our forefathers »

The future of Renault F1

September 17, 2009 by Joe Saward

Renault managing-director Patrick Pelata says that the French automobile company has not decided what will happen with its Formula 1 team, following the Singapore scandal.

“This is not the issue right now,” Pelata told French radio. “We will take our time before looking at our options.”

It has been widely assumed that Renault’s decision not to dispute the charges – a nice way of saying that the team was guilty – means that Renault intends to continue in F1 and has got rid of Flavio Briatore and Pat Symonds (it is not really relevant whether they resigned or were fired, just that they have gone) in order to be able to show the FIA that it has taken action against those involved in the race-fixing scandal and hope that the FIA will be lenient towards the team, as it does not want to lose another F1 team, nor the engine suppliers which Renault provides for the Renault F1 team and for championship contenders Red Bull Racing. The number of Renault staff has been reducing in the course of the last year with aroun half the staff at Viry-Chatillon being laid off or reassigned after the F1 engine freeze in 2008. The celebrated factory has been in operation since 1969 when the old Gordini company was merged into Renault and the new facility, called the Usine Amedee Gordini, was established. It was the headquarters of the Renault Sport F1 team in the 1970s and 1980s and then switched to engine development in the late 1980s. When Renault returned to F1 with Williams in 1988 Viry-Chatillon was again at the forefront of F1 development and a string of World Championship followed until 1997 when the decision was taken to withdraw from F1 and sell the engines to sub-contractor Mecachrome. A small team of engineers at Viry-Chatillon continued to work on the development of the V10 engines with funding being provided by Mecachrome. When Renault bought the Benetton team in 2000 the activities revived again, although much of the manufacturing remained outsourced to Mecachrome, while Renault engineers did the development work. The most recent accounts (for 2008) reveal that the team made a loss of $16m. In part this was due to increased costs but the team is also thought to have suffered from a shortfall of expected sponsorship revenues because of performance clauses in the ING sponsorship. The team’s turnover was $244m, but it spent $260m. It is not clear how much of this Renault had to pay but it is clear that Renault boss Carlos Ghosn has been demanding cuts and Renault became one of the leading forces in cost-cutting this year. This year Renault has already reduced it staff at Enstone by 60 people, mostly as a result of the closing of the test team. The team has a combined staff in France and England of something like 820 people, but this is being reduced to 570 in 2010. Briatore told the Italian media earlier this year that by 2012 there would be only 200 people working at Enstone. Mecachrome also laid off 11 of its F1 staff at Aubigny earlier this year.

Reducing the staff is the fastest way for any F1 team to save money and quite a few of the Renault staff laid off this year have already been taken on by the new Manor F1 operation, which is building the cars in Bicester.

Renault has nonetheless committed to stay in F1 until the end of 2012 and although the team could be sold on to someone else (or given away, a la Brawn-Honda). The man most likely to want it is David Richards, who has alreadyn been linked with being Flavio’s replacement. I don’t see that myself. Richards has moved on from being an F1 team principal. He runs a car company now, so if he took over the team he would want it to become an Aston Martin team in a few years from now. If Renault want to ditch the team he might be a good option, but one has to ask whether there is money to run the operation in the medium term. Aston Martin is in no position to pour in cash but its Middle Eastern backers might be.. Richards has denied he is in talks with Renault about replacing Briatore. That does not mean he is not trying to get control of the team…

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • More
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Posted in F1 Teams, Personal musings | 6 Comments

6 Responses

  1. on September 17, 2009 at 20:30 James Bennett

    My first thought when I heard the DR rumour was that it would be a buy-out rather than him just slotting in. Otherwise, as you say, it doesn’t make sense

    How about DR taking over the team and getting the 4th supply from Mercedes (with Red Bull allegedly being vetoed by McLaren and Williams being out of the picture as well), with Red Bull and Williams getting Renaults?

    Also, if Prodrive do buy Renault and Sauber reappear with a new name, we could have as many as 5 new team names on the grid next year, plus Lotus Mk II. That’s nearly half the grid under new management – remarkable, especially if you consider Brawn will be going into only its 2nd season under that name. Although saying that, I doubt we’ll see all the brand new teams making it to Bahrain/Australia…


  2. on September 17, 2009 at 20:32 Womabt

    Any threat to GP2 series which is closely accosted with the F1 circus and the Renault engine deal in all this – or will the FIA take that into consideration when it decides the severity of the punishment for Renault will be.

    I still find it hard the believe that they could have been so dumb to not realise that it would all come out one day.


  3. on September 17, 2009 at 22:46 Grabyrdy

    Personally I can’t see any reason why Renault would want to stay. They’ve got to invest heavily to get back to the front, their main asset Alonso is very probably off, they’ve got to find people to run the team, they’ll very likely have to pay a large fine. What’s the point ?


  4. on September 17, 2009 at 23:21 john r. favre

    I am trying to find out what the speed was when Nelson Jr staged his crash in Singapore. I have found no mention of this anywhere. Any clues?


  5. on September 18, 2009 at 06:53 Lustigson

    @ James Bennett

    My first thought when I heard the DR rumour was that it would be a buy-out rather than him just slotting in. Otherwise, as you say, it doesn’t make sense

    How about DR taking over the team and getting the 4th supply from Mercedes (with Red Bull allegedly being vetoed by McLaren and Williams being out of the picture as well), with Red Bull and Williams getting Renaults?

    Exactly my thoughts. And a Mercedes-Benz deal would also constitute engine supply for future Aston Martin models, I reckon.

    Sadly, though — IIRC, due to some deal with Ford when Richards and the Arab consortium took over — any team owned by Prodrive and partners would only be named Aston Martin from the 2011 season onwards.

    That leaves us with Prodrive-Mercedes for 2010 and with Aston Martin-Aston Martin (re-badged Mercedes’ of course) for 2011. Now if they could only lure L.C. Hamilton or J.A.L. Button to the team for the same year. ;)


  6. on September 20, 2009 at 17:02 Motorsport Links

    [...] The future of Renault F1 « Joe Saward’s Grand Prix Blog Renault managing-director Patrick Pelata says that the French automobile company has not decided what will happen with its Formula 1 team, following the Singapore scandal. [...]



Comments are closed.

  • Click on the picture to learn more about Joe

  • Blogroll

    • Joe Saward on Facebook
    • The New York Times F1 Blog

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: Customized MistyLook by Sadish.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 14,240 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.