• Home
  • Blog rules

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« A rather overlooked piece of news
Watches in F1 »

Sarcelles F1 plan waits on Sarkozy

March 16, 2010 by Joe Saward

The French Grand Prix is not going to happen in 2010, nor in 2011. The event, once considered to be an essential race in the F1 calendar, is suffering from the French government’s lack of interest and its desire not to stir up trouble with green-minded folk. This is illogical, of course, as the biggest problem for any sport is the number of spectators travelling by car, rather than the carbon footprint of the event itself. Formula 1 has been very poor at arguing this case – at least thus far – but there is no doubt in terms of emissions that the Tour de France cycle race or Disneyland Paris are far more damaging to the environment than a single F1 race. Sports like golf, soccer and even fishing attract far larger spectator numbers and thus pollute more than F1. However until the Sarkozy government is talked out of the current mentality, little is going to happen.

Sarkozy is big on environmental issues. He has an urban renewal plan for Paris, called Grand Paris, which aims to invest $50 billion creating better transport infrastructure and to plant a new forest of one million trees around Charles de Gaulle airport to help combat pollution. This does not really fit in with the construction of a Formula 1 circuit in the same area. Sarkozy’s lack of interest in F1 can only be defined as being misguided, cosmetic or electorally-inspired. Nicolas Deschaux, the president of the Federation Francaise du Sport Automobile (FFSA), France’s national authority and the
body that controls the event, says that the French GP is going to remain in trouble until the French government wakes up to the realities and helps out. He says that Russia’s support of Vitaly Petrov is an indication of what is now needed if France is rebuild its heritage in motor racing.

One man who clearly understand the value of a French Grand Prix in the Paris region is François Pupponi, the mayor of Sarcelles. This commune has had a poor reputation for many years because of social housing projects that have become unemployment black spots. Sarcelles was where the major 2005 riots in Paris took place. Pupponi wants to use F1 to breathe new life into his suburb and is ine of the prime movers in a regeneration project called “Val de France” which aims to develop the area, with business parks and a much better image. The F1 race is part of that plan. Around 270 acres of state-owned land has been set aside for the circuit and Pupponi has been busy putting together funding from banks to pay for the construction of the track. He is well on his way to having all the planning permission necessary. Architects are working on the project and a contractor will soon be announced. If all goes well the work will start in 2011 and there would then be a race in 2013.

What he still needs is someone to pay the race fees and he hopes that national, regional and local government will all chip in as they will all be gaining considerably as result of an event as economic benefits in the region each year will be substantial. Until that money is sorted out, France has to wait for Grand Prix racing to return.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • More
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Posted in Circuits | 10 Comments

10 Responses

  1. on March 16, 2010 at 16:06 Johnny Gold

    I wish Pupponi every success, but I remember that the Birmingham SuperPrix races of the 1980s ran though some of the less salubrious parts of the city and it never quite seemed a comfortable fit.


  2. on March 16, 2010 at 20:21 Chris Porter

    Joe,

    First let me say I’m a big fan and regular reader of your blog.

    I’m a conflicted individual who finds myself part greenie and part petrol head. I’d be interested in reading your sources regarding the CO2 emissions from F1 races compared to other sports, as I find it hard to believe that flying all that equipment and all those people to the other side of the planet and having 26 cars racing round a track at 6mpg has a lower footprint than the cumulative effect of the fans attending the race.

    Thanks,

    Chris


  3. on March 17, 2010 at 08:08 Mark J

    Clearly, the French government has the same myopic view as our does (USA) and feels like it must pander to the lowest education level in the electorate when instead they should use common sense.


  4. on March 17, 2010 at 08:15 Mark J

    Chris, you are forgetting that many of the thousands of people who are attending the races are also flying halfway around the world, then renting cars to sit in traffic for hours while trying to get to the venue. You cannot honestly believe that even at 6mpg, 26(actually 28 counting the safety car and the medical car) are leaving a bigger carbon footprint than the many cars and planes it takes to get people to the races?


  5. on March 17, 2010 at 13:14 steve

    I wish they’d get a move on with sorting out the French GP. Sarcelles might work, there’s easy access from Gare du Nord via RER and there’s a small business-only airport at Le Bourget nearby. However, the surrounding area is maybe not the most picturesque place in France to have a race. I can’t imagine the northern suburbs of Paris look particularly enticing through the tinted windows of Bernie’s limousine…

    I used to live 10mins walk from the Albert Park circuit in Melbourne, then I moved to Paris and there’s not even a race in France anymore. We need a French GP back on the calendar if only so we can twist Joe’s arm to do ‘An Evening With Joe’ in Paris…!


  6. on March 17, 2010 at 13:48 Proesterchen

    I for one commend any government that resists the urge for subsidies to hold an event that is clearly not economically feasible given today’s cost structure and attendance.


  7. on March 17, 2010 at 20:33 Chris Porter

    Mark J,

    I’m not forgetting that lots of people travel to the races using some form of fossil-fuel powered transport, and I know that the CO2 output from the race cars themselves (and support vehicles) aren’t anywhere near the cumulative effect of the traveling spectators. That’s only a tiny proportion of the total fuel expenditure of the F1 circus though, and that’s why I’d be interested in seeing some numbers about the actual carbon footprint of F1, the footprint of the spectators and the footprints of other sports as a comparison.

    Chris


    • on March 18, 2010 at 10:34 joesaward

      Chris Porter

      GP+ this week has an interesting reflection on these things…


  8. on March 18, 2010 at 13:26 Chris Porter

    Thank you Joe, I’ll check that out


  9. on April 13, 2010 at 17:54 Praveen Titus

    A highly illuminating article!

    I don’t know much about France, but economic issues aside, for a country that has such a rich heritage in motor racing, particularly Grand Prix racing, the current lukewarm feeling towards the sport is absolutely pathetic and should be tormenting racing fans in the nation.

    This could be a narrow-minded opinion, but I used to study French at the Alliance Francaise here in India, and all I learned about their culture was “frommage” and “bouillabaise”! I don’t think they value their motor racing heritage at all. The loss of the Pau F3 street event is a case in point.

    It’s equally sad that many French drivers who’ve excelled in the lower formulae in the last decade have never made it to F1. Let’s hope Jules Bianchi gets into F1 soon thanks to his absorption into Ferrari’s driver programme. He’s highly rated and his success in GP2 and eventually F1 could make the French government change its attitude towards F1.

    It’s also worth noting that Formula Renault EuroCup runner-up Jean-Eric Vergne is already making waves in British F3. And he is, if I’m not mistaken, from Paris!



Comments are closed.

  • Click on the picture to learn more about Joe

  • Blogroll

    • Joe Saward on Facebook
    • The New York Times F1 Blog

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: Customized MistyLook by Sadish.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 14,240 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.