• Home
  • Blog rules

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Off to the Salon
Korean decision not before October 11 »

Oh what a circus!

September 30, 2010 by Joe Saward

It has been a very long day at the Paris Auto Show, but I learned a few things of note; made some connections and managed to avoid getting a parking ticket although I parked in an outrageous fashion because I could not find a better option. And there’s the rub… The traffic getting into the show was absurd and as I sat in a jam for more than an hour and watched the tram scuttling by on its turf carpet, I wondered why it is that we have car shows. We have far too many cars in Europe as it is. Next time I go to the Porte de Versailles for a big exhibition, I guess I will go by tram…

I went to see what Group Lotus was up to and was left in wide-eyed awe at the money that was being spent, and at the cheek of those involved. Team Lotus and Group Lotus were separated from the very beginning in 1954 – so as to avoid one company hurting the other – and although each helped the other with reflected glory and technology – they were never one entity. So to claim all of Team Lotus’s victories as its own was, I felt, a pretty outrageous piece of piracy on the part of Group Lotus. That is an opinion that is not shared by others, but we are all entitled to our own views. To argue that Team Lotus is a brand that has not been used since 1994 and thus – miraculously – it should belong to Group Lotus, holds very little water in my mind. Anyway, that will sort itself out in courts of law, or in political lobbies in Kuala Lumpur.

Group Lotus billed the Paris Show as the dawn of a new era. And you cannot fault the ambition. Whether it will work or not is another matter: The company launched: “five new cars, two evolutions of existing models and a concept car. A sumptuous new magazine. A flashy new website. And a range of merchandise featuring not one, not two, but three separate clothing ranges”.

It will be several years before all of this comes on song (if indeed it ever does) but, for the record, there is a new 5-litre V8 Lotus Esprit which Lotus describes as “the ultimate supercar”; there is a new Elan, a new Elite, a new Elise and a four-door saloon called the Eterne. I was watching the event with the boss of another car company, who had come along to see whether all the rumours about Lotus were true. His reaction as each new model was unveiled? “This is the best smoke and mirrors job I have ever seen!”

He said he would believe it when the cars go into production. Turning out prototypes for car shows is relatively easy, putting the same cars into production is another matter.

I thought that was fair. From what I can gather, Dany Bahar, the new Lotus boss, got the job to run the company because he turned up with private investors (from Malaysia), willing to pay $450 million in the next three years to try to turn Lotus into a rival of Ferrari, McLaren and Porsche. Bahar is not a man who lets the grass grow under his feet. He has changed jobs with remarkable alacrity in recent year. He knows little of the car industry and yet he believes that he can beat them all at their own game. Well, good luck to him. Personally I think that Lotus buyers tend to come from a different segment of the market. One can alienate one’s traditional customers in the hope of convincing the supercar buyers that a Lotus is a good idea, but why would anyone splash out that kind of money on a Lotus, when you can get a new McLaren?

What else? There were new WRC cars from Ford, Citroen and Mini, but there was little F1 influence at the show, where the emphasis is very clearly on sustainable machinery. F1 is foolish if it ignores such a trend in the industry… There were a few interesting concept competition cars and all the latest road car stuff. Nothing to get really excited about. The most interesting car, as far as I was concerned was not one featuring astonishing technology, but rather interesting geography: the Mastretta MXT, from Mexico’s first homegrown car manufacturer…

Advertisement

Share this:

  • Email
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Posted in Personal musings | 30 Comments

30 Responses

  1. on September 30, 2010 at 20:30 cvrt

    Shame that Gaddafi didn’t turn up with his 30 virgin bodyguards to present the new Saroukh el-Jamahiriya. Now that would be a circus!


  2. on September 30, 2010 at 23:03 Ben G

    That Bahar bloke needs a shave.

    And if Group Lotus were so concerned about Team Lotus, why didn’t they sort out a deal with David Hunt years ago?

    Any idea how much Fernandes paid Hunt for the brand?


  3. on September 30, 2010 at 23:30 FletcherB

    Joe,

    While I agree with your general take on group-lotus vs team-lotus…

    Group Lotus weren’t averse to taking credit from Team Lotus back in the day either…

    An original (or properly restored) gold-leaf coloured Elan or JPS Europa has little stickers claiming 3 times or 5 times world-champion on the body-work…


  4. on September 30, 2010 at 23:39 FletcherB

    http://www.conceptcarz.com/view/photo/103431,11063/1974-Lotus-Europa-JPS_photo.aspx

    My point being…yes they are being cheeky, and hopefully dont have a legal leg to stand on… but Colin Chapman has already traded on the public’s confusion between the two separate companies.


  5. on October 1, 2010 at 00:08 Top Posts — WordPress.com

    [...] Oh what a circus! It has been a very long day at the Paris Auto Show, but I learned a few things of note; made some connections and [...] [...]


  6. on October 1, 2010 at 01:30 bob

    so its clear joe saward has a bitter vindetta against Group Lotus……funny I dont see 1 Malaysia F1, Tune group and Air Asia in the sponsor sidebar though?


    • on October 1, 2010 at 08:26 joesaward

      Bob,

      What an unpleasant post. Read what you have written and ask yourself how you would feel if someone sent you such a message. You’d probably be a little upset by it. I do not have a vendetta against anyone. It is very clear to me that Tony Fernandes is both a great businessman and a man who loves motor racing and all of its heritage. He has worked wonders with AirAsia and with Lotus in F1. I am very happy that Dany Bahar wants to revive the Lotus name with new cars. I think that whole programme is wildly unrealistic (as does much of the automotive industry) and I think it is wrong to try to grab the Lotus heritage when the Group has no right to it. The link between the two was Colin Chapman. If his family think that Tony Fernandes is a good man to run Team Lotus then I think that is fine. They may also think that Bahar is a good man to run Group Lotus, but if Bahar wants to use the Lotus name he should negotiate an arrangement with Fernandes, not try to bully him out of the way. I think that this is a perfectly reasonable argument and certainly not worthy of abuse.


  7. on October 1, 2010 at 02:41 Rob

    Joe, just wishing to understand your stance on the Lotus situation.

    In September, with Tony Fernandes having bought the name ‘Team Lotus’ and soon to end his relationship with ‘Group Lotus’, you write this…

    “Team Lotus and Group Lotus were separated from the very beginning in 1954 – so as to avoid one company hurting the other – and although each helped the other with reflected glory and technology – they were never one entity. So to claim all of Team Lotus’s victories as its own was, I felt, a pretty outrageous piece of piracy on the part of Group Lotus. That is an opinion that is not shared by others, but we are all entitled to our own views. To argue that Team Lotus is a brand that has not been used since 1994 and thus – miraculously – it should belong to Group Lotus, holds very little water in my mind.”

    While back in June, when Tony Fernandes had an agreement with ‘Group Lotus’ but no relationship with ‘Team Lotus’, you wrote the article “Why Valencia is Lotus’s 500th Grand Prix”…

    “A number of people do not think that Lotus should be celebrating the celebrated marque’s 500th Grand Prix, arguing that Lotus racing has got nothing to do with the old Team Lotus and that it is just a piece of brand engineering. That is a matter of opinion, but I’ll explain why I think it is justified. It is all down to one man: Tony Fernandes.”

    http://joesaward.wordpress.com/2010/06/25/why-valencia-is-lotuss-500th-grand-prix/

    So, if I understand it correctly, the Lotus that should be allowed to claim the brand’s racing heritage is whichever one Tony Fernandes is involved with at any given point in time?


    • on October 1, 2010 at 08:17 joesaward

      Rob,

      As I have said many times. If the Chapman Family think Tony Fernandes is right for Team Lotus, then Tony Fernanes is right for Team Lotus. It is not that hard to understand.


  8. on October 1, 2010 at 06:59 allard

    hey joe. i took the paris metro …. 1 euro 70 … no traffic … just a lot of parisians…. cu soon.


    • on October 1, 2010 at 08:15 joesaward

      allard,

      You are smarter than I am…


  9. on October 1, 2010 at 09:29 Ben G

    Just watched the video of the Lotus unveiling. What a load of old guff.

    If Group Lotus is so keen on stressing its racing heritage, then why did they wheel out such a weird array of celebrities to pull of the covers (in the dark) – Mickey Rourke?!

    As for the cars… The new Elan looks ok, but the others are woefully disappointing; half-baked Aston Martin rip-offs, with a bit of Audi A8 thrown in, but styled with an awkward 80s retro feel. They look overweight and flabby, and a million miles from the lithe Lotus cars of old. What a shame.

    I think I’ll save up for the McLaren…


  10. on October 1, 2010 at 09:49 Canehan

    Is a vindetta a vindaloo-light ?


    • on October 1, 2010 at 12:22 joesaward

      Canehan,

      Yes, it only burns at the edges…


  11. on October 1, 2010 at 10:45 Steve Burton

    I’ve been a Lotus car owner for a few years now and think the new Group Lotus strategy is about the best they could have delivered given the time and resource they have. As a Lotus purist I hate to see more weight and more fluff but if Group Lotus is to start making money its got to appeal to the wider market and not just people like me who pretend to be track day hero’s. The previous mgmt at Group Lotus didn’t have a clue about their market, customer needs or how to make a profit. They launched the Europa S which flopped, they launched the fabulous Evora and that flopped. Why? Price, Product and placement. No clown is going to pay £60,000 for an Evora which chucks out less power than a Cayman, SLK or Z4. Sure, the new strategy might not make it all into production but these are cars people will want to buy if they were available today. If Lotus can make the new Esprit handle like the Evora or Exige with 600 horses then they have every right to take on the big boys. I don’t like Dany Bahar or Group Lotus for how they are behaving against Lotus Racing but if the strategy they put forward yesterday doesn’t work I’m not sure what will.


  12. on October 1, 2010 at 11:27 Joe Saward sul nuovo corso Lotus « alexf65

    [...] ottobre 2010 di alexf65 Lascia un commento Oh what a circus!: [...]


  13. on October 1, 2010 at 11:37 Alan H

    If it all does go pear shaped for Tony (and I hope it doesn’t as he seems genuine and passionate in his commitment) then I’m hoping that the Lotus Racing t-shirt I bought at Silverstone might become a collectors item.

    Seriously, though, I was always thought it was common knowledge that there were two distinct Lotus companies and that Team Lotus raced with – or was at least licenced to – Pacific Racing in 1995 (at least a small sticker was visible on the side of the nose of that years car). Does that not count as active participation?

    Lastly, why is it called Lotus, Joe? I’ve tried searching but come up with no clues.


    • on October 1, 2010 at 12:20 joesaward

      Because Lotus flowers make you sleepy and Chapman felt the same way about his first car, which kept him up at nights and tired him out.


  14. on October 1, 2010 at 11:53 tim w

    So Bahar brought $450 million with him well big deal. This is peanuts when it comes to designing and developing new models. Whem BMW owned Land Rover they spent $1 billion developing the then new Range Rover. OK you wouldn’t need to spend that much on a small sports car but it is not nearly enough to get all these new models into production.
    The problem Lotus cars has is their reputation for reliability is poor. Cutting corners on development is not the way to address this issue. Maclarens Ferraris Astons and the big Mercs that Bahar wants to compete with are beutifully built machines that Lotus are unlikely to be able to compete with in terms of quality. Autocar Magazine’s verdict on the new Evora says that while it handles very well it can’t compete on build quality with the Porsche Caymen. This story will be repeated with the new models when and if they ever get built. Lotus has a good business selling cheap small sports cars and should stick to what it does well rather than over extending itself and risking everything, we don’t want another TVR.
    P.S Joe will you visit Nigel Stepney in the big house?


  15. on October 1, 2010 at 12:39 Steve Burton

    tim w – I think you’ll be surprised just how far Lotus have come with reliability since they partnered with Toyota. My S2 Exige has done almost 80,000 miles and has been used frequently on track and is my daily driver. There aren’t many cars you can drive to the track, punish it for a day and then drive home and then continue to use every day. They are also more refined these days then the general public give them credit for.

    With regards to build quality I think you might be shocked at what you see close up from Ferrari’s, Aston’s and Lamborghini (Porsche excl.) Sure they look great but the build quality and issues (for how much you pay) is no larger or smaller than what Lotus owners put up with. The little niggles you get with these low volume cars all add up. If I drove a Ferrari, Lamborghini and Lotus everyday I guarantee the Ferrari and Lambo would be more unreliable. You’ve gotta change the clutch every 5k miles on a lambo!

    The problem Lotus have is that the majority of people who buy Ferrari’s buy them because “they are a Ferrari”. Its nothing more than a sign of wealth or snobbery. Yes, the pure Ferrari owner buys the car because it appreciates the history, design, power blah blah blah. The only way Lotus can build a brand like Ferrari is to make them exclusive and piggy back off motorsport.


  16. on October 1, 2010 at 15:51 Rogerthedodger2007

    Canehan – a Vindetta, as all who were “mods” in their teens will know, is a wine-powered motor scooter.


  17. on October 1, 2010 at 17:22 jim

    Nice hatchet job there, Joe…


  18. on October 1, 2010 at 19:10 Duncan Snowden

    FletcherB: Presumably in 1974 Lotus Cars had Team Lotus’ permission.


  19. on October 1, 2010 at 23:29 Azkwith

    Hi Joe,

    Did you catch the Buckeye Bullet across from the Lotus booth? You mentioned it in one of your posts. I definitely got the green vibe from the show this year. A notable absence of hyper cars like a Bugatti, Aston Martin, Ruf, Pagani, Mansory… Anyway, I’m in Paris until Sunday afternoon and would love to show you the Bullet if you’re able


    • on October 4, 2010 at 07:15 joesaward

      Azkwith,

      Yes, I saw it. Interesting.


  20. on October 2, 2010 at 02:45 Maha

    Oh.. Malaysians.. always claim everything that’s not belonging to them..


  21. on October 2, 2010 at 09:26 tim w

    I remember hearing that Chapman called the company Lotus as a joke referring to his time buying cheap second hand cars from the auction houses. In Chapmans day any cars that didn’t meet their reserve price on the day of sale would be left outside with a sign in the window saying Lot un sold or Lot us for short. Thus they could then be purchased cheaply from their desperate owners without having to pay commission to the auction house.
    Apparently Colin picked up a few bargains in this way and thought it would be amusing to name his cars after the unwanted lot us cars


  22. on October 2, 2010 at 09:29 tim w

    I have no idea if the above story is true or not but I did hear it told as a true story many years ago by a friend of Chapmans on a TV documentary on his life. Could be complete tosh of course.
    P.S While you were at the Paris show Joe did you hear the rumours of a Porsche come back to F!?


  23. on October 4, 2010 at 11:10 the kitchen cynic

    For a modern-day Chapman equivalent in F1, read Gascoyne or Newey. Newey wasn’t available, Gascoyne was.

    Ironically, for a Chapman equivelent in road cars, I would say these days read one G. Murray…


  24. on October 29, 2010 at 16:49 LCD Screen Cleaner :

    i love new cars specially those prototype ones that have some out of this world feature’;’



Comments are closed.

  • Click on the picture to learn more about Joe

  • Blogroll

    • Joe Saward on Facebook
    • The New York Times F1 Blog

Blog at WordPress.com. Fonts on this blog.

Theme: MistyLook by Sadish.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 11,664 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.