• Home
  • Blog rules

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Pic confirmed by Virgin
So Kimi goes to Enstone »

That end of term feeling

November 28, 2011 by Joe Saward

The Formula 1 season finally ended on Sunday after 35 weeks of almost non-stop action, including 19 races. It may not be the longest in the history of the sport, but it was certainly the most concentrated and the most far-flung. I cannot say I have even thought about adding up the flying mileage but these days, in my sub-conscious, I consider any flight under six hours to be “local”.

This year it was decidedly weird to be wishing our mate Dan Knutson – F1’s only proper American reporter – a cheery “Happy Thanksgiving” while Sao Paulo was dotted with Christmas trees and Father Christmases. The first Christmas card landed on my computer on the Friday. Having an F1 race this late in the year was new. Back in the 1990s we used to have races in Adelaide in mid-November, but in those days things did not kick off until the end of March and there were only 16 events, so in fact the calendar has been extended by two weeks in each direction (although this year we lost Bahrain), so we are on the road for a month more than we used to be. This is not the latest that F1 has ended in a year, that record belongs to 1962 and 1963 when the South African GP used to be in the last week of the year. And the United States GP in 1959 was held on December 12. Back then of course there were only a handful of races in the season.

Almost everyone who does all the races (and that number is dwindling) was tired and ready to go home this year. That is really not a surprise when one looks at the timezone hopping that we have been doing in recent weeks. It really is no wonder that we are all coughing and sneezing. We take all these time changes for granted these days and sometimes forget that normal people cannot do the same. I have long believed that F1 people should be studied by medical types to see how they cope with the lifestyle.

The aim now is to go home and stay there for as long as I can, with a log fire or two, a few glasses of wine and, perhaps, a little winter cooking. There is plenty to be done, of course, with the annual prize-giving season already underway and seasonal reviews, books and so on, not the mention the blog. From the 19th of December I expect that F1 will shut down for about a fortnight, although the factories will be churning out parts for the new cars so that they will be ready to run when testing resumes. In the interim there is the usual weekly tittle-tattle of drivers, teams and circuits. The F1 driver market is still somewhat fluid (more so than people realise because some of the deals announced may yet be changed). There may also be some personnel changes now that the season is done. I expect to see some action at Lotus Renault GP and at HRT.

The driver market will largely depend on two teams: Lotus Renault GP and Force India. These are the best drives available and so until they are decided the other drives will probably remain open. The decision at Lotus Renault will probably be influenced by the decision at Force India as the Silverstone team is still to officially decide what to do. It has Adrian Sutil, Paul di Resta and Nico Hulkenberg on its books and all want to race next year. I think that Hulkenberg and di Resta both have race deals for next year and that the team is now in a quandary because Sutil has come on rather more than anyone thought this year. Whatever the case three into two will not go and the odd man out is going to be in demand. Lotus Renault and Williams may be waiting to see if Sutil or Hulkenberg come onto the market.

Lotus Renault seems to have the most number of candidates for its two available seats, even given that Robert Kubica is now out of the picture for 2012. Team principal Eric Boullier wants Romain Grosjean, who he manages through Gravity Sport Management. That is probably a good choice, but there have been hints that Boullier’s position might be under threat, because of the team’s poor performances this year. It is probably not smart to add further disruption to a team that is already destabilised, but that depends on whether the board of directors believe that Eric is the best man for the job – and who might be a better choice. Vitaly Petrov is likely to continue thanks to his Russian connections, while Bruno Senna, Rubens Barrichello and Kimi Raikkonen would all like to have a try, but the team is looking for someone to inspire progress. Oddly enough, in recent races Sutil has looked like the best man on the market, although his situation is complicated by the fact that Lotus Renault partner Eric Lux believes that Sutil stabbed him in the neck with a champagne glass at a party in Shanghai… Still, one could argue that it would be great PR to be seen to be forgiving and forgetting such things.

Williams seem to have the Venezuelan money to keep Pastor Maldonado, although that is really the only justification for him being there. What Williams needs more than anything is someone to inspire the troops and get things moving in the right direction. The once-great team has lost the esprit de corps that used to exist in the old days and needs a new figure to be the focus for a revival. Most people doubt that Raikkonen and Sutil are the right men for that job. Maldonado is clearly not and Rubens Barrichello has not stepped up to the plate this year in that respect. The Kimi Raikkonen deal is definitely dead, I hear because of a personality clash between those involved in the negotiations, but I keep hearing from good sources that Valtteri Bottas may already have the drive alongside Maldonado.

With HRT having decided on Pedro de la Rosa (which wins the prize for Most Bizarre Decision of the Year) and Marussia Racing having picked Pic, Jerome d’Ambrosio is floating about. Tonio Liuzzi is supposed to have a contract with HRT but I am quite sure that this will not be respected as HRT wants either another Spaniard or a thumping great pay-driver, a la Maldonado. Red Bull has been giving HRT money to run Daniel Ricciardo (22) but that is not really helping his career much because there are no real signs that the new owners at HRT understand F1. Thus Red Bull is probably looking to move Ricciardo elsewhere.

Red Bull has created plenty of problems for itself in recents years because it has promoted so many young drivers. It has so much cash that it has already axed half the generation, but it still has them stacked up looking for somewhere to drive. It reminds me a little of the problems that Elf had back in the 1980s when it had up to 10 of its drivers in F1. This meant that one or two others with real potential never got the chance they deserved.

Red Bull Racing has Sebastian Vettel (24) and Mark Webber (35). Queueing up behind these two are Sebastien Buemi (23) and Jaime Alguersuari (21), both of whom have been racing pretty well at Scuderia Toro Rosso. Behind them are Ricciardo and Jean-Eric Vergne (21). It does not take a rocket scientist to work out that Webber’s days are numbered and that the logical choice as his replacement in 2013 is one of the four youngsters. It had been thought that Buemi and Alguersuari might get axed to make room for Vergne and Ricciardo, but they have both done pretty well this year and it is hard to clobber them (although Red Bull advisor, Dr Helmut Marko has had no qualms about torpedoing a number of careers in his time). I am now hearing that they are both likely to stay for another year. That means that Marko now needs to figure out where to put Ricciardo and Vergne.

I would guess that Jerome d’Ambrosio will take his backers with him to HRT (unless Giedo Van der Garde can outbid him) and that Vergne will spend another years in the Renault World Series, having lost out this year to Robert Wickens. Unless Wickens can find cash I don’t see him getting anything more than a reserve driver role.

I would imagine that Vergne will also be the test driver for Red Bull Racing as well. Ricciardo’s option are limited, if Toro Rosso is not available to him. How many teams are there between HRT and Scuderia Toro Rosso? Team Lotus and Williams. There is no seat for Riccardo at Williams, and the only way that he could be slotted into Team Lotus would be if the team booted out Jarno Trulli, or if Heikki Kovalainen were to be poached away by a bigger team (such as Lotus Renault).

The goal, however, seems to be for Marko to have four youngsters to choose from when it comes to replacing Webber in 2013. In the finest traditions of the British aristocracy, it is always wisest to have “an heir and a spare” in case of anything untoward.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Digg
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Like this:

Like
2 bloggers like this post.
  • Johnsen
  • Rick Dekker

Posted in F1 Drivers, F1 Teams | 75 Comments

75 Responses

  1. on November 28, 2011 at 13:02 roger coleman

    Been a good year I think Joe, by and large. Always a pleasure to read your reports, accurate, in depth and honest.
    Much appreciated
    Have a great Xmas


  2. on November 28, 2011 at 13:09 Billy Coffee

    You say Helmut Marko has “no qualms about torpedoing a number of careers in his time”, but lets face it, Buemi, Ricciardo and Algueusuari would be nowhere near F1 if they’d not had Red Bull paying for them to climb the F1 ladder.

    Brendon Hartley was axed and had nothing but compliments for Red Bull saying
    it had given him six years of amazing support. Scott Speed on the other hand went kicking and screaming!

    Personally I think Alguersuari or Buemi needs to get booted. They’ve been good-ish, but is there really any sign that either driver is the next Vettel? I don’t reckon so.

    Put Ricciardo in show Buemi the door. No one said F1 was nice!


  3. on November 28, 2011 at 13:12 Billy Coffee

    …also, I reckon you’re too quick to write Mark Webber off. He’s only 35 and there’s no indication at all that a younger driver would be doing a better job. (Mansell was winning races at 41!) He and Vettel actually compliment each other quite well in many respects. Webber’s speed disadvantage this year has probably helped with the team’s stability in any case!


  4. on November 28, 2011 at 13:22 ian

    Fascinating post.


  5. on November 28, 2011 at 13:39 F1 Fanatic

    I don’t see why Senna can’t inspire progress, he’s much better than Grojean was in 2009


  6. on November 28, 2011 at 13:43 Michael Lea

    good post Joe. This Red Bull business puzzles me. It seems like every yr we are told Webber will almost certainly be out and replaced by a Red Bull jnr driver…then he signs another 1 yr contract…and Red Bull take on yet more youngsters! I wouldn’t be surprised to see Webber carry on into 2013 if he wins a few races next yr…by which time Red Bull will probably have half the Renault World Series and GP3 drivers all lined up!! Still, gives us fans plenty to talk about down the pub!


  7. on November 28, 2011 at 13:49 John (other John)

    I was starting a different end of term bit of revision. Apparently, there is a lot to say in favor of reliability, if you perform less maintenance. Say, the overnight post quali teardowns pre RRA, Parc Ferme etc.

    Not being an engineer, the gist of this – which i have not started to read properly, just discovered the reference – is *apparently* that there may be more margin of error introduced by inspection.

    Of course, it could be wagged “don’t fix it if it ain’t broke”, but that’s not quite what i am trying to understand . . lessons via scientific method for certain team managers, maybe :-)

    Here’s the report, originally done for American Airlines and published by the DoD: http://reliabilityweb.com/index.php/articles/reliability_centered_maintenance_report_by_f_stanley_nowlan_and_howard/

    Title: “Nowlan, F. Stanley, and Howard F. Heap. Reliability-Centered Maintenance. Report Number AD-A066579″

    That’s a lot to read, but they sure typed things nicely, back in the day .. oh, and wrote clearly. I have thousands of papers on later CS, here, which do not even cite their date of publication in the text.


  8. on November 28, 2011 at 13:52 Tom

    Isn’t some speculation that Trulli’s contract does not actually guarantee him a race seat in 2012?


    • on November 29, 2011 at 18:25 joesaward

      Tom,

      An F1 contract is nothing more than the point at which a negotiation starts.


  9. on November 28, 2011 at 13:56 Adam

    Joe,
    Totally agree that Pedro de la Rosa was this year’s most bizarre choice. I suspect he will be shown the door by mid season. As will Massa IF Kubica has the fitness to race, is not bound by contract and has shown performance in an old Ferrari. Which leaves Webber. If Kubica does not come up to speed and Massa is under performing in 2012 I see Webber retiring from Ferrari, not Red Bull in the future. The perfect team mate to Alonso, can get constructers points but not threaten Alonso.


  10. on November 28, 2011 at 14:03 PeterF

    Thanks for all the hard work, Joe. I’m heavily reliant on you as one of very few sane & reliable sources, and expect to be even more so in 2012, give that the BBC content will be heavily edited and filtered to conjure the appearance of as-live-as-it-could-possibly-be-without-actually-being-live.

    Have a great break and a good rest!


  11. on November 28, 2011 at 14:21 Josh

    Alguersuari vs Buemi has been interesting because it’s been so hard to see whether they’e any good.

    In contrast, Vettel completely and utterly floored Bourdais in 2008. I’m still surprised Bourdais kept his seat until half way through 2009.


  12. on November 28, 2011 at 14:48 nambo1976

    Joe,

    I hope I speak for a lot of your readers by saying what a pleasure it has been to keep tabs on the world of F1 through your blog. Your unparalleled contacts and your masterful ability to tell a story make your site my primary source for F1 related information. Have a well deserved break for a great season’s work.

    Any truth in the rumours Joe that Red Bull might be trying to place Ricciardo at Team Lotus / Caterham for next year instead of Trulli?


    • on November 29, 2011 at 18:25 joesaward

      nambo1976,

      They are not rumours. I was asked not to write it, but others have so I can now say that this is what is going to happen.


  13. on November 28, 2011 at 14:54 _GOGGS_

    Thanks Joe, enjoyed following and learning from you. Have a great off season. What was your favorite momory of this season? Biggest surprise and favorite circuit/place to visit?


  14. on November 28, 2011 at 15:03 Grabyrdy

    Thanks Joe for your wonderful stuff all year; not excluding this one, which has us all already thinking about next year.

    Bottoms up and bon appetit !


  15. on November 28, 2011 at 15:14 Gus82

    Mind boggling! Given his recent performances it would be a travesty if Sutil is not picked up by someone, but the guy I feel really sorry for is Jerome D’Ambrosio. He has outqualified a vastly more experienced and respected team mate this year and HRT is apparently his best option!

    Or could he end up back at Virgin if Glock was poached by Lotus Renault GP??

    Great insight Joe, thanks!


  16. on November 28, 2011 at 15:27 Ambient

    I wonder if it more a point that PDR has been drifting off form rather than Sutil getting better. (much the same way as Luizzi did in his year)

    PDR has been ok. Nothing more, nothing less. It’s strange how trhe media has avioded the second half of the season comparison (as it was quick to highlight the first half) and concentrate on his points tally.

    He hasn’t set the world alight and on season long form he shouldn’t get the drive. (He was beaten in Friday free practice by NH too for what that is worth)

    I don’t overly rate Sutil but I rate him higher than PDR which if I were PDR would be a worry. I suspect Merc is thinking twice about him too


  17. on November 28, 2011 at 15:31 Andrew

    Joe what are your thoughts re Adam Parr’s abilities to guide Williams’s through these troubles?


    • on November 29, 2011 at 18:24 joesaward

      Andrew,

      Adam has many talents. The questions is whether they are the right ones for F1.


  18. on November 28, 2011 at 15:33 CTP

    lots to talk about and think about in there…
    agreed on HRT/PDLR! i can’t see PDLR lasting the season there, or at least getting to drive in all the races.
    bottas and maldonado at williams… a little risky in terms of car development, especially with new engine partners? rubens stays on as reserve driver/winter tester to help set up the car?
    buemi/alguersuari… most underwhelming! maybe they’re both brilliant, who knows, but it’s got to be worth trying at least one new driver there just to see… or at least rotating 3 drivers in two cars throughout the season? maybe webber even gets moved over towards the end of the season if he has another year like 2011…


  19. on November 28, 2011 at 16:00 Canadian F1 Fan

    Hi Joe

    Big thanks for all your efforts this season, looking forward to reading this spot all winter as the news breaks…. lol No pressure.

    You’re always my first click for the latest, thanks again and get some R&R if you can.


  20. on November 28, 2011 at 17:19 GeorgeK

    Thank you for the season long flow of information, tidbits of rumors, as well as behind the scenes insights.

    Will Buxton (SPEED on track reporter) cornered Bernie prior to the race start and asked him what was holding up closure on the Austin deal.

    “Two things”, Bernie responded, “A pen and a check.” The pen referencing the unsigned contract and the check obviously the cash for the sanctioning fee. And he said it with a laugh.


    • on November 29, 2011 at 18:23 joesaward

      GeorgeK,

      It is really simple. Bernie asked Tavo Hellmund for $25m. It was a mate’s deal. Hellmund failed to deliver on that. Bernie now wants $35m from the Circuit of the Americas. That is business. He cannot be seen to settle for too much less because that would affect other races that whinge about the price. On the other hand he wants the US and needs two races, not one. The Austin people would be wise to shut up and negotiate privately and Brenie would be wise to stick at $25m, but tell Austin to tell the world the deal was $35.


  21. on November 28, 2011 at 17:20 Jack

    I think it’s harsh to judge De La Rosa for going to HRT. It’s not like when Schumacher came back and everyone said he was damaging his legacy, what legacy does De La Rosa have? Although Button is the only driver who ever mentions it, driving an F1 car must be pretty fun, and if De La Rosa wants to have another year driving in Formula One races then why not? He’s a racing driver and surely all racing drivers would rather be racing a rubbish car than not racing at all, especially at his career stage. What’s he got to lose?


  22. on November 28, 2011 at 17:40 F1 Kitteh

    I’m sure Kimi’s managers are very shrewd in financial dealings but it seems the deals for drives just keep falling thru. If he really wants to drive that badly I wonder if he’s better off with with some new management, its hard to read whether he’s not really that interested in driving or only interested in driving for a lot of money or if its just an image projected by his management. The perception just doesn’t feel so good.


  23. on November 28, 2011 at 17:54 Shinil

    So many good drivers… sad to know some will not race, Wish F1 had more teams or perhaps if the teams had an option to fill the race seat of an underperforming driver 2 with a third driver whilst keeping driver 2 on the books… That would keep driver 2 on the edge and is likely to improve performance,
    Example would be If Force India can commit Nico to atleast 50 % of races next either replacing Paul or Sutil – This should spice up inter team rivalry…


  24. on November 28, 2011 at 18:11 mild7nick

    Joe,

    I put this to you that if Toro Rosso was any normal midfield team then the sensible thing would be to keep both drivers. However that isnt the case, the team’s purpose is to serve as a proving ground for the young drivers to see whether they are ready to step up to their bigger brothers further down the pitlane.

    Although Buemi and Jaime have been very solid, especially the latter as the season has gone on, after 2-3 seasons they surely now must be judged on whether they are ready to drive alongside Vettel at RBR, and I would say neither has shown quite enough potential to earn that drive.

    Hence why although it may seem harsh both should make way for Riccardo and Vergne so they can now have a chance to show if they can potentially be ready for RBR in 2013.

    I understand why normally that decision may seem tough to some but one must remember that Toro Rosso is on the grid for very different reasons to all the other teams and as such this would be the correct way to go in my view.


  25. on November 28, 2011 at 18:11 mattw

    The trouble with Buemi and Algueusuari is that neither is a known yardstick and neither is convincingly faster than the other. They could both be great or both be rubbish.

    Marko would be better off placing one of these at Caterham, and then placing Ricciardo into Toro Rosso.


  26. on November 28, 2011 at 18:17 Nick T.

    *edited

    I love F1, but all the travel sounds damn lonely to me even with a regular crew of journo buddies and exotic overseas hookers (kidding). If Williams signs Bottas I will punch a wall. Myself and many others have patiently been waiting for them to sober up and put their “the chassis makes the driver” attitude and inability to deal with the egos of any driver good enough to command leverage days behind them. If Raikkonen is really of the table, signing Sutil or The Hulk seem to me the only way they’re going to win back any optimism or excitement from the fans and team. How can they be so blind? Or are they maybe really much more cash-strapped than any of us imagined… I was hoping for a big post-season Qatari bank sponsorship, but that also seems to have fallen apart. They were probably not helped by their continued embarrassing performances in the closing races of the season. It seems in the Raikkonen negotiations, Williams might have been falling back on the expectation it could get Sutil or Hulkenberg for far cheaper if Kimi wasn’t pliable. However, with Sutil coming back to positively dust off Di Resta in the second half that they are hoping Renault takes their Hulkenberg obligation of their hands…leaving Williams with no good options. I like Barichello as a man, but he seems to be a human metaphor for an old team on the decline serving only lip service to ever winning the championship again.

    Is there any chance my other favorite independent, Sauber, will get any serious sponsorship? Carlos Slim should step up with some sort of cornerstone sponsorship. Just a pipe dream as it seems they’re using Sauber as a vehicle for Ferrari or bust.


  27. on November 28, 2011 at 18:20 packapoo

    Red Bull are somewhat adept in slotting their drivers into other teams.
    Why not put their first team’s number two driver into another spot, something half decent though, say Renault.
    Could leave a spot for the other Australian then, that’s if his star hasn’t dimmed too much from wasting time at HRT.


  28. on November 28, 2011 at 20:50 Mark

    Joe, I’ve really enjoyed all of your posts this year and I am angry I didn’t subscribe to Grand Prix magazine. Next year for sure, I’m there, its on my wish list for Christmas. Keep up the great work and enjoy your break (if you have any) you deserve it.


  29. on November 28, 2011 at 21:06 Schmorbraten

    Just watching Brazil FP3 BBC with David Croft and Nico Hulkenberg … nice to hear that Croft made the point that nowhere in the press release about the 2012 contract between Trulli and Team Lotus / Caterham does it say that he’s going to be *racing* for the team. Until now I had the impression that the F1 press didn’t really pick up on that detail. Trulli is going to be *a* driver for the team in 2012.

    Fernandes just recently said that Kovalainen is definitely not for sale, and Trulli doesn’t even need to be booted out – he’s just the reserve if everything else fails.


  30. on November 28, 2011 at 22:40 Lezza

    What about the second Ferrari seat if Massa doesn’t perform?


  31. on November 28, 2011 at 23:37 criscles

    Joe, as ever your insight beyond the superficial this year has been exemplary. What with Lotus v Lotus, the Bahrain situation, suspicious Gribkowskys, banks, politicians, contracts et al, your contributions have made this year richer again. In addition, your “Aside with Joe” contributions to Sidepodcast and GrandPrix+ magazine have been staples of my F1 year. The icing for me was the chance to catch you at “An Evening with Joe” at the Australian Grand Prix this year. Hope to do the same in 2012. Wishing you a very peaceful Christmas and New Year. Onwards and upwards and “nil carborundum illegitimi”. Thanks – Anthony.


  32. on November 28, 2011 at 23:37 Anthony

    I always assumed that these drivers drove as hard as they possibly could, but Sutil’s radical improvement towards the end of the season makes me wonder. From the moment that it became apparent that he was likely to be dropped and di Resta retained, he has consistently beaten di Resta by a margin. Why couldn’t he be that fast before? I suppose it’s true that the prospect of execution concentrates the mind, but surely to a true racer the prospect of a race should concentrate the mind pretty well too.

    Even so, to have enabled Force India to relegate the Mercedes team to being the third Mercedes-powered team home must have endeared him to his capricious master.


  33. on November 29, 2011 at 00:11 Ben Harris

    Joe, fantastic work with grand prix+ and the blog again this year, much appreciated! Enjoy that log fire!

    Is there any possiblity toro rosso might end up rotating the drivers next year – they do have previous on this, I remember them swapping liuzzi and klien in and out in the early days of RBR….personally I think it would be a bit silly but it would be something I could imagine as they really have got a bit of a conundrum with four good drivers!


  34. on November 29, 2011 at 00:28 Adrian Newey Jnr

    Its a shame the way international motorsport is these days that there isn’t too much else for the top drivers to compete at. In the early days, they had serious options like Indy, sports cars etc which arguably had the same level of prestige (eg winning Le Mans or Indy 500). That would give young drivers other avenues rather than the be all and end all of driving in F1.

    Personally, I would like to see some of the old warhorses “retire” to Le Mans prototype racing or some other venue that would free up the market for younger blood. The ban on testing, in my opinion, unfairly tilts the balance in the favour of older drivers who help ultra cautious team managers to sleep at night. As fans, we have to ask ourselves, what opportunities do the next Senna or Schumi have to come out of nowhere to impress?


  35. on November 29, 2011 at 00:29 Pedro

    You anti-Williams views never seem to end.


    • on November 29, 2011 at 17:03 joesaward

      Pedro,

      The readership never fails to impress me. Williams is my favoruite team. It has been f0r 25 years. All I am doing now is saying that they are doing things wrong. They don’t need me to tell them that.

      But top accuse me of anti-Williams bias is priceless.


  36. on November 29, 2011 at 02:17 elephino

    @Billy Coffee

    The difference between Hartley and Speed is personality. Speed has had issues with his since he left the Red Bull fold, including a quite public spat at this year’s Indy 500. Hartley is a nice person. Now that may count against him in the harsh world of F1 and it could also be part of the reason for his being axed (not being thought of as being hungry enough to make it to the top – whether he was or wasn’t is entirely different).

    As for Webber, he still has some pace in spite of his driving style not suiting the new tyres and car (I believe it is more than just the tyres). But that is immaterial as Helmut Marko is not sentimental and would kick out Webber in a heartbeat if he thought there was a ‘new’ Vettel to replace him. MInd you, he’d likely replace Vettel with a new Vettel if the old one stops winning.

    ——-

    I find it interesting that there are so many Raikkonen rumours whenever he’s in talks with a team. Considering they are reasonably consistent in style, it would suggest that his management team are the ones ‘leaking’ in the hope of moving the process along. Of course, this then holds up the other dominos while the team in question goes through whatever processes required to decide whether or not to hire Kimi.

    At least it gives something to look forward to in December.


  37. on November 29, 2011 at 02:25 dj_ghosie (@dj_ghosie)

    Trulli’s case is quite fascinating. I guess if he gets the boot (from racing at least), on the face of it it will be his own decision to hang up to save some PR shambles. Question is, will he hang around as a development driver for Lotus or simply going back to run his vineyard business?

    Also, will RB swap Alguersuari with Ricciardo at HRT? Could be a face-saving move for all instead of giving anyone a real boot.

    Thanks for tolerating idiots in the comment section all year long! Time for a well-deserved break Joe.


  38. on November 29, 2011 at 02:35 RShack

    Joe, I’m sure you need a rest and home looks comforting… but your personal saga makes me wonder: How long can you stay at home without getting a case of happy feet (aka urge to go)?


  39. on November 29, 2011 at 07:19 Matt

    Can’t help but think that Ricciardo will pop up at Caterham next season. It’s said Trulli’s driver contract doesn’t mention ‘racing’ anywhere and if RBR offer a healthy discount on their gearbox and KERS units to give Ricciardo a seat… Well, Jarno has been rather whingey this year…


  40. on November 29, 2011 at 07:25 Simon

    Kimi at Renault?


  41. on November 29, 2011 at 08:00 OXO

    So, Kimi to Renault. Who’d have thought it? They would have been better off throwing money at Force India to get Di Resta.


  42. on November 29, 2011 at 08:20 Kishan

    Early bird gets the worm!

    Kimi Raikonen to Renault Lotus. Now that is from left field.


  43. on November 29, 2011 at 08:20 Tim Howard

    Dear Joe, It’s been my first year following your blog during a F1 season and it’s been a blast, thank you very much. You will be an integral part of my non-Sky F1 season next year. All the very best. PS: BSB are having their share-holder meeting and were allegedly bragging on the “Today” programme on Radio 4 that the Murdoch/Newscorp saga has has no impact on their sales. Well I appreciate it’s a drop in the ocean but we’ve cancelled our Sky contract at work and I won’t be signing up at home next year, so, surely that’s two less contracts? Wonder how many others are out there doing the same thing?


  44. on November 29, 2011 at 09:10 Joanna

    just heard. YEEEEEEEEEEES!!
    Raikkonen back with Renault. 2 year contract. Possibly less of a gruelling job for Kimi than Williams would have been. Does Boullier stay on?


  45. on November 29, 2011 at 09:14 Mattcafc

    Interesting decision by LRGP with regards to Raikkonen and even more interestingly, no comment from Boullier in the press release.

    As always, Joe, your sources are impeccable. I hadn’t heard a whiff anywhere else that Boullier’s influence was diminished, but you’re right again.

    Any idea on the financials of the deal? I know Kimi was looking for equity as part of his remuneration, I would have thought LRGP is one of the few teams in a position to meet that. Have you heard that?


  46. on November 29, 2011 at 09:21 Whitby Jon

    Joe
    What have you heard about Kimi going to Lotus Renault


    • on November 29, 2011 at 17:00 joesaward

      Whitby Jon,

      Nothing. The plane ride lasts for 12 hours


  47. on November 29, 2011 at 09:44 Alduin

    One piece of the puzzle is in place – Kimi went to Lotus official for 2 years which basically means door’s closed for Kubica, yet it seems he wanted this to happen.


  48. on November 29, 2011 at 10:58 Denorth

    how has it changed this morning? ;)

    Kimi is back,
    Petrov’s manager is talking to two other teams…

    Rubens might not be walking away after all.


  49. on November 29, 2011 at 11:12 davcuk

    views on raikonnen?


    • on November 29, 2011 at 17:00 joesaward

      davcuk

      One of the darwbacks of the F1 reporters who actually attend races is that they have to travel. You can read all those who do not travel… they all seem to think themselves experts.


  50. on November 29, 2011 at 11:59 paul

    Kimi is back! Signed up for Renault so he did, the wee dancer!


  51. on November 29, 2011 at 12:03 simon morris

    Brilliant article. I can just see why the Paddock loves you so much!!!


  52. on November 29, 2011 at 13:37 Jimbo

    Hi thanks for the post. I’m curious would it be possible to start rotating the drivers in a team? So you could have buemi alguersuari and ricciardo doing around 13/14 races each?


  53. on November 29, 2011 at 13:43 noahracer

    If it wasn’t the longest, it was certainly the most tedious. It’ll be more so with 20+ races a year.


    • on November 29, 2011 at 16:47 joesaward

      noahracer,

      I exprct 19 races in 2012


  54. on November 29, 2011 at 13:53 Jem

    Driver market 2012 is looking like a massive game of musical chairs, except it’s being played by special forces soldiers and (career) death is potentially at stake.

    I can see Buemi being a loser in this one, he’s had the longest in F1 of “the Red Bull Four” and Marko might want to properly compare Vergne or Ricciardo to the relatively equal known quantities at Toro Rosso.

    Joe, who’re your tips for the top drives in 2013? With Webber, Massa and Schumacher all likely to sent packing at the end of next season, who among the current midfield looks good enough to earn a seat at the top table?

    Di Resta? A recovered Kubica? Perez? Dare I say it : Koboyashi?


  55. on November 29, 2011 at 15:51 allen booth

    Raikkonen!
    Can we trust a BBC report? This means 25% of the field are world champions, and every champion of this century is racing in 2012. What fun!


  56. on November 29, 2011 at 15:55 JEZ

    And the winner is Kimi Raikkonen! GO KIMI!


  57. on November 29, 2011 at 17:19 bloomsm

    20 years ago I had a chance to begin a career as a sportswriter for a San Francisco area newspaper. The pay was horrid and the job consisted of working every Friday and Saturday night. I loved writing about sports, but I passed and went on to get a professional degree. When I read about the travel, the hours, the deadlines and stress, I think I made the correct choice. It is said that sportswriters have one of the highest divorce rates among professions, mostly due to the hours. As much as I would love to have continued on and maybe one day written about F1, reading about your life, Joe, confirms I made the correct decision back in those days.


    • on November 29, 2011 at 18:14 joesaward

      bloomsm,

      That’s a cheery thought for me!


  58. on November 29, 2011 at 17:21 graham.reeds

    Pedro,

    It is also Joe’s blog. He can have opinions that differ from yours and probably will.

    GR


    • on November 29, 2011 at 18:13 joesaward

      graham.reeds,

      Thank you.


  59. on November 29, 2011 at 21:14 Schmorbraten

    Mattw,

    I don’t think it’s possible both Buemi and Alguersuari are rubbish, because most of the time they deliver quite similar times, and it’s more likely that this is because they’re both extracting pretty much all the speed there is in the car, instead of both being very finely balanced at the same level of mediocrity.

    As a team boss, I’d always try to only replace one of two drivers, because that’s the only way in modern F1 by which you can compare and judge the drivers. You just can’t judge them on speed or overall results, because even Senna in an HRT would never be on pole.


  60. on November 30, 2011 at 13:13 John (other John)

    Schmorbraten,

    very good points, but Senna in a Toleman Hart? Schumacher in a doddery Jordan? I think you chose less than the best example. I firmly believe it is within the ability of a extraordinary talent to wrangle a hopeless tin chariot beyond expectations. To a certain extent, this is a belief i hold, rather than rationale. Rational Man, does not seek the statistical errors in life, usually if he does, there is calamity. A man designed the car, the aero, set the ratios, the balance, and another man can choose how to test or strain or utilize those factors, if he understands how they work. He may place a car on track to overcome what he is dealt. In other words, i have a certain faith that man betters the machine, even if really what he is doing is bettering the other men who designed it. That very idea is what raises the hairs on my arms, so i intend to keep it. Ceteris Paribus, your point holds true. But the argument may be made, that the sport – any sport – is not made by mere mortals, and this idea follows all human aspiration, yours – j


  61. on November 30, 2011 at 17:28 Scott Bloom

    Joe,

    What was right for me is not true for everyone. Personally, I enjoy reading your travel writing as much as the race reporting. And there are times I would gladly give up the law chambers for a chance to follow the circus with you and your colleagues. But instead, I blog, Dewar’s firmly in one hand.

    Thank you for your hard work from those of us who chose another route.


  62. on December 1, 2011 at 00:14 Schmorbraten

    John

    I knew that would come from somewhere, but without rain and with today’s reliability, there’s not much scope for such heroic deeds. I respect your romantic point of view regarding human endeavours in sports and controlling machines, but my view is: when Senna drove that first lap in Donington, he simply made (extraordinarily good) use of the range of possibilities that the laws of physics gave him, with that car, on that day, on these tires etc., or in other words it just showed how much less everyone else was extracting from the speed that was theoretically in their cars.

    And in spite of this rational perspective, I am still in awe watching these guys do what they do, because it’s untouchable for 99% of mere mortals like you and me.


  63. on December 1, 2011 at 13:46 John (other John)

    Schmorbraten,

    i don’t think we are entirely in disagreement. My reply was, as you said, the obvious response. What i see which stuns me, when it happens, is the occasional man, who never having a PhD in physics, senses what he experiences, and turns that about, to advantage never previously calculated. In fact, the romanticism i feel is that laws of physics can be embodied thus in a human being. Somehow, that reinforces for me the sense that physical laws are actually laws, ad personam. Taking this far further than necessary, i consider great driving par with innate morality, though no driver seems to have passed that test cleanly. I do not know what it is that gives mankind a sense of its environment, but as a product, i am very keen on the idea. I hope to continue to enjoy it, not get wound up about silly commercial deals which sully the experience. all best – j


  64. on December 1, 2011 at 20:17 RShack

    John (other John)

    > i consider great driving par with innate morality, though no driver seems
    > to have passed that test cleanly.

    I wish that would fit on a bumper sticker, just to keep the neighbors confused ;-)


  65. on December 2, 2011 at 00:07 John (other John)

    RShack,

    nah, how about they get to do pointillist miniature work in the can, instead of the usual pressed plates?

    Now i am wondering how i can make the sentiment a pure Bible Belt sticker. You know, all monosyllables. Sorry, God, and those more respectful of him. :-)

    Let’s try: No Driver Clean Pass Test Of Life.

    any good?



Comments are closed.

  • Click on the picture to learn more about Joe

  • Blogroll

    • Joe Saward on Facebook
    • The New York Times F1 Blog

Blog at WordPress.com. Fonts on this blog.

Theme: MistyLook by Sadish.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 11,675 other followers

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.