A look back at the testing

It is easy to get carried away with the results of a couple of days of testing, particularly now that interest and expectation are building in the run up to Melbourne. Pundits are all looking for ways to look clever using the numbers and those who prefer to talk about the way the cars handle cannot accurately gauge what that will mean on the clock. So the Red Bulls look very good on the track but that has not been seen on the clock, except if one analyses some of the longer runs that have been seen. People write of the importance of fuel loads, but one must also remember that teams have been known to confuse things in the past by using a line other than the start-finish line to ascertain lap times, with the “official” results thus not really reflecting the reality. The wiser engineers are concentrating on doing their own thing and not getting spooked by teams that might be showboating. There is no question that the fuel load is of key importance as every 10kg of fuel means around four-tenths of a second on the lap times. Add to this the question of tyre degradation, as there seems to be a pretty major drop off in performance after the tyres have done a few laps. Winning races is going to be about management this tyre wear as much as possible. Outright speed may be impressive, but consistency will also count when it comes to the races. The general feeling, however, is that this year the field is too close to call. The majority of the teams are all very closely matched and qualifying in Melbourne will likely come down to hundredths and thousandths of seconds.

Red Bull, Lotus, Mercedes, Ferrari and McLaren all look good, although McLaren has had some off days. Sauber looks pretty useful as well and Force India has had its moments as well. And the Williams too was quickly up to speed after the team chose to miss the first test.

On paper, however, the fastest time of the winter went to Nico Rosberg on Saturday, with a best lap of 1m20.130s. The German completed a total of 251 laps during the four days and his team-mate Lewis Hamilton, who was fastest on the final day, ended up third overall, having done almost as many laps. What this showed was that the car has speed and is also very reliable. But these days all the cars are reliable ad the amount of running has been impressive. Overall, Mercedes has done more miles than anyone else in the three tests, clocking up 3,320 miles in total. To put that into perspective, it is 17 Grand Prix race distances. At the same time the team knows that it is dangerous to get too confident.

“We definitely haven’t seen the full potential of our competitors yet, so it’s difficult to predict where we might be,” Hamilton said.

The two Mercedes drivers were split in the final test by the Ferrari of Fernando Alonso, with his team-mate Felipe Massa fourth. Overall Ferrari completed 3,050 miles in the various tests. Mercedes might have done the most mileage but the other team that had admirable reliability (which equates to the number of laps run) was Sauber, which did a total of 3,300. The best laps were not close to the speed of the Mercedes on the last two days of the testing, but Nico Hulkenberg was in the ballpark, depending on the fuel load. McLaren’s winter mileage ended up at 2,875 miles, while Red Bull completed 2,862 miles of running and is clearly not in any great panic. One can safely assume that the team has more speed up its sleeve.

Lotus showed well on several occasions, but the team did a lot fewer miles than most of other teams, with the total running the three tests amounting to only 2,190 miles. Williams, which missed the first test completely with its new car, managed to do 1,917 miles in the final two tests, which puts Lotus’s lack of mileage into perspective. Yet, there is no real panic at Lotus either.

Force India completed 2,783 miles of running and seemed to be fairly competitive, while the last test ended up with Scuderia Toro Rosso behind both Caterham and Marussia, which seems a rather unlikely outcome given the trends seen thus far. The Caterham-Marussia fight seems likely to continue with Charles Pic just fractions ahead of fellow countryman Jules Bianchi, now a Marussia driver, on the time sheets. Caterham did a very solid 2,778 miles of running, while Marussia looked stronger than last year but ran five hundred miles less. Whatever the case, these figures show just how reliable the cars are in the modern era. These remember are effectively prototypes, but they hit the ground running and running and running… That is a sign of great engineering.

So, it is fair to say that no-one really has any real idea about who is going to be where when the teams show up in Melbourne – which is exactly what the sport wants!

72 thoughts on “A look back at the testing

  1. I think that during these tests it is fair to assume that Mercedes, Ferrari and Renault will have run a version of their 2014 KERS systems, where more power will be available for more of the time. The failure of the Merc at Jerez on day 1 was down to a wiring loom fault, but I can’t see the one controlling engine and gearbox actually causing a problem that could not be fixed by the guys in the garage.

    The body language of both Nico and Lewis during TV interviews did not suggest that they did anything special, only that they had successfully complete their test programmes.

    1. Why do you think it’s fair to assume that? The 2014 system is totally different than the 2013. The 2014 engine includes exhaust energy recovery, not just regenerative recovery and the energy recovered is much greater. The 2014 system will be totally different and modifications will have to be made to the physical chassis to house the system. I think there is no way teams will be testing this system during testing; it would be a waste of time re the 2013 championship, which is going to be very close . They need to concentrate on the 2013 cars or be behind the curve.

      I’m also curious to understand your familiarity with the Mercedes wiring harness; do you have some special inside contact there that allows you to write so authoritatively on this issue? Have you actually seen the wiring or understand its complexity?

  2. Hi Joe,

    I agree that analysing these times is a bit of a pointless exercise – I tried to do so a couple of years ago and found that there was too much uncertainty in the data to make meaningful conclusions, for the same reasons you describe above.

    When you also take into account the fact that the 2012 tyre situation added another variable, then that also adds more uncertainty to the times 😉

  3. Methinks it’s not going to be a year of speed – It’s going to be a year of tyre management to ensure you get at least as many decent laps before your times start dropping. Overcook your tyres and times seem to immediately drop. It seems to point more towards a slow thinking man’s racer than a speed merchant. So the F1 Champion is going to more like the Paris Dakar winner than a fast driver….. Well that’s my view at this present time. !

  4. I pretty much only listen to what you say about this kind of thing, but as a long time Mclaren fan I’m getting real sick of Mclaren being there abouts but not quite there, so frustrating.

    I’m going to go look for a site that says Mclaren is looking good for this year to temporarily live in ignorance.

  5. Pundit lottery: costs nothing to call out a future winner, because everyone else is going to get it wrong, too.

    But, just in case you “call it right”, you can dine out on that for a good while.

  6. Joe,

    do the testing miles have to be done on engine(s) and gearboxes that come out of the annual allocation of engines/boxes or is this wholly outside the allocation?Could for example, a team use unexpired engines/gearboxes from the previous year, if they wanted to save money?

    Wilson

  7. The excitement and tension is slowly but surely adding up! Only thing left is to renew my GP+ subscription and get ready for Melbourne. How I hope Mercedes will be able to compete at the front. Can’t wait…

  8. It was reported that the night before testing Kimi took his two nephews Titus and Ronicus out to a local tapas bar and ordered fish, most likely oysters.
    Excuse me being judgemental, but oysters! in a tapas bar!

    For everyone except Kimi the correct sequence is:- mountain run or gym, then complex carbohydrates, then an early night. I have no quarrel with his lifestyle [press myth or not] since it doesn’t stop him delivering on the track. But I mean oysters .. that’s living dangerously.

  9. I’ve lost count of the number of times that teams who excel in winter testing end up with a middle of the pack car.

    I expect Red Bull, Lotus and Ferrari to lead the way this season, because they’ve the most solid foundations to build upon from last year. Mercedes had to make up 1s on last years fastest cars, but the other teams have already moved on futher, so don’t expect them at the front without some kind of double diffuser loop hole trickery. McLaren have changed design philopshy (crazy given they had the fastest car for 3/4 of last season!), so they’re surely where the likes of RBR and Ferrari were this time last year?

    If I were a betting man I’d have money staked on Vettel again this season, even if the Ferrari is the 2nd quickest car, I think we’re unlikely to see the Mercs and Mclarens right up there, and thus they’ll not be taking points off RBR on those off days.

  10. Is there any restrictions on number of engines & gearboxes that the teams are allowed to use during these pre-season tests? I would guess that even though the modern cars are almost bulletproof in their reliability, a single engine wouldn’t be able to handle 17 GP’s worth of mileage, so would the age of an engine affect the lap times in any appreciable way?

  11. Great article Joe, good to see someone not trying to create a running order out of what is essentially guesswork. Can’t wait for Melbourne, should be a cracker.

  12. Joe, you have been watching the pre-season for years. What team do you think looks good? Who has been showboating? How about an opinion?

  13. Just supposing the mercedes cars do well in melbourne then one might well say that all the recent management aquisitions may not have been needed if they were needed in the first place.

    1. One might. But then they were very fast at Melbourne last year too, but by the end of the season they were quite slow. Which may be the reason for the M-B board deciding they needed a clear-out (preceded by hiring some rottweilers).

  14. The reason you cant read to much into test results apart from the obvious sandbagging and use of alternate start and end points in a lap is that the point of testing is to experiment, some of those things will not work, some will. What we don’t know yet is who moved the furthest in technology from last year. McLaren by there own admission did move a long way, Red Bull claim did not (its an evolution). The further you moved the less you know about the best way to utilize the car.

    I suspect that Mercedes looked good because they really came to terms with last years car through improvements and thus appeared to perform well in the tests. RBR went to a lot of trouble to hide the car if it is just an evolution, but if it is they came to terms with it quickly. McLaren really want and need to have bad days and run lots of miles so they will understand the way to set up a brand new car. The fact they had good days suggests that the potential is in the car, not like a few years back when it was pretty much back to the drawing board right now.

    As McLaren have reliability I would say that they have the bigger potential to find improvements, to evolve faster and better this season. The question is then has RBR hidden much bigger improvements than is apparent from testing. The problem is for Button and McLaren is that every mistake they make, Alonso and Ferrari will eat away at them in the points and give RBR and Vettle an edge at seasons end. Alonso, regardless of how good the car is will grind away to get any point he can. That is the dynamic Button and McLaren have to beat this year in addition to RBR and Vettle and that is a huge challenge that is not reflected in the test data.

  15. Nice synopsis Joe.

    It’s funny that every year people want to over-interpret testing times and try to prognosticate based on lap times. There are so many variables at work at any one time. Some teams are sandbagging, some teams go out on glory runs. Testing times are not the be all end all. Until the teams run in anger in Melbourne, we won’t really know the true measure.

  16. If the BBC is right and McLaren will switch to Honda after next year will Paddy Lowe be allowed to shorten his garden leave?

    1. Joe only ever answers one question at a time (if he feels like it) so which do you think he answered? (or commented upon)

  17. The thing I like is that despite a team’s initial performance in testing the ground is always shifting as teams create and lose progress through updates. F1 is an extremely slippery sport to try and predict. It’s quite democratising from a pundet point-of-view. It’s more of a question of statistical data interpretation/forcasting.

    I’m really looking forward to watching LH get to grips with the W04.

  18. If it is close we’ll miss this competitivity next year unless the new rules produce something extraordinary. Let’s hope so.

    1. Point me to a team who has 100% absolute faith in its off-track simulation program and I’ll consider adding ‘sandbag’ to my dictionary.

      1. No one has 100% confidence in off track simulation or they would not test at all. But you assume that sandbagging is entirely dependent on off track simulation. Sand bagging can be the driver saying the car sucks when it is really setting good times, moving the start and end point of testing so that you lift coming over the line every (flying lap) but you have good time to work from over the 2/3’s of the track that is important to evaluate the cars engineering or you always test with high fuel loads. The ways to sandbag are immense and still have good data to work from.

        1. Disagree. ‘show-boating’ is the real problem. If some teams fall into the trap of doing low fuel runs on super softs to impress then teams like Red Bull who go about their business quietly and thoroughly are always going to be accused of subterfuge.

  19. Thanks Joe – useful stuff, as always. Quick question – how many engines do teams use during testing? Is there a limit?

  20. Ignorant question perhaps – but what is the actual benefit of ‘not showing your hand’ and disguising your times? Presumably every team is working to the max over the winter anyway?

    1. The benefit is that if you have found one second per lap over the winter with some super secret change then telling people now, especially if it is easy to change on other cars, prevents you from getting full benefit from the innovation. So yes sand bagging could be worth millions of pounds at seasons end.

      If you have a margin of superiority you don’t want to telegraph it and have others working hard to figure out what it is! If they think you are about the same as the rest then the opposition will spend as much time looking at everyone else as they will looking at you. You have a big performance delta then they spend all their time figuring out what makes the difference on your car! A top team stays a top team by knowing when to be cautious and when to show boat. And you show boat in qualifying and on a race Sunday, not before.

  21. Hi Joe…many people I know is asking me about a rumour involving McLaren and Honda…what have you heard? Is this a rumour that is logic even if it never materializes?

  22. 1 Red Bull
    2 Mclaren
    3 Ferrari
    4 Mercedes
    5 Lotus

    My guesstimate for the season, would like to see Ferrari further ahead but since the days of Todt/Brawn they seem to bungle things.

  23. As the new car is often spoken of as an evolution of the previous car, an interesting statistic although probably extremely hard to quantify would be what percentage of difference there was in each car. e.g Ferrari 23% new component changes vs. Red Bull 17% – the stat would only be helpful to indicate what degree of change teams made. Theoretically you would expect teams in 2nd 3rd 4th to have to make larger percentage change to make inroads.

    1. It’s not really an interesting a statistic precisely because it’s so difficult to quantify.

      Base it purely on the number of new/evolved/changed components and it wouldn’t be tough to “change” 10% without having any impact at all on performance – and without really putting much work in.

      An experienced technical director may be able to use some estimates to calculate a reasonable value for the engineering hours saved by re-using old designs and set that against the hours of new design work done. Probably gives a more useful value. But may be affected by changes in design policy, knock-on effects, etc.

  24. Joe, great summary of testing. For me McLaren and Red Bull have been quietly beavering away keeping out of the limelight but still doing significant mileages and looking solid. I really think the new Lotus E21 shows great potential in the hands of Raikkonen and Grosjean but there surely is a bit of a question mark over its reliability. I thought that Mercedes bounced back extremely well after the disastrous start of the first two days and did extremely well with reliability, mileage and pace. Incidentally I make it that Sauber did the most miles with 3,297 and Mercedes next up with 3,246. Mercedes actually confirmed they had completed 5,224Km (3,246 miles) in a twitter post on March 3rd. Can’t help but think that with Hamilton and Rosberg they will win races this year. No doubt that Ferrari also look pretty good and Alonso is such a fighter, if he gets a good start this year he will take some beating. Looking forward to a great season.

    As always Joe great insight, thanks very much.

    1. There’s no law against it! For myself, I usually find GA very interesting and informative, but I must admit I thought his attempt to use the testing times to calculate which were the fastest cars was a bit unscientific. I was surprised he did that.

  25. Joe,
    FYI. There is an excellent article in a German magazine Auto Motor und Sport ( use Google translate), which shows the rake of the latest cars.

    Running with a higher rake, then this is effectively a bigger diffuser. It is of no surprise that the Red Bull is running the most rake and has done for a number of years. When you see the rake in photo’s it’s just stunning most of the others are virtually flat and the RBR has got about at least 2″ – 3″ more rake at the rear. Sandbagging ……I’ll bet on it.

  26. Back in the day it was easy – the quickest car at a pre-season test would be the one with the most space for more sponsors logos….

  27. one (possibly daft) way of getting the teams’ testing to reflect where they’re at would be to give a few – say 3,2,1 – points, to the most miles and fastest times…

    a similar idea might keep the track busy during free practice

    1. I like this a lot. Better than the sprinklers idea Bernie had.

      Too many times in FP and Quali do teams try to sit out to conserve their tires. Bad show for the fans in the stands and at home…Pirelli may have improved the “show” on Sunday but pretty much stole the show Friday and Saturday…

    2. You’re right, it is a daft idea. The clue is in the name.. ‘Testing’ !!

      I’m quite sure the vast majority of fans are happy to wait for a thing called the ‘Racing Season’ to start.

  28. What a pity testing was only available on Sky in the UK. Virtually no TV coverage was given elsewhere, even on Bring Back Comedy who are at least committed at present for transmitting 50/50 live and highlights. I’m very interested in what will happen over the next few years in the UK and elsewhere. TF1 have lost the contract in France to Canal+, Italy is now Sky (albeit again shared with terrestrial) – it will be a test as to how popular, or not, F1 is on a subscription basis. Tricky issue this for the teams but I feel they’ve lost vital pre-season publicity to build a fan base. I’d love to know the viewing figures from Sky on recent testing.

  29. Just waiting for the last minute of qualifying in Melbourne to see where things really lie, then Sapang…then Shanghai…

  30. There is no truth in the rumour that Red Bull had half a ton of sand delivered before each practice. 🙂

  31. RPACO (above) got me thinking … just nothing to do with testing – that is …… $1 bill weighs 1 gm therefore $1mill = 1 metric ton therefore Bernie by todays low worth (after divorce I suppose) is by Wiki worth 4.3 Billion therefore he needs a big wheelbarrow to carry round 4,300 Tons of US$ bills he’s made from F1.

Leave a reply to bob Cancel reply