The 107 percent rule

There is a lot of jibber-jabber out there regarding the 107 Percent Qualifying Rule and whether or not the full grid will be able to achieve that in Melbourne.

The rules are clear on this matter. Article 36.1 of the FIA Sporting Regulations states that “during Q1, any driver whose best qualifying lap exceeds 107% of the fastest time set during that session, or who fails to set a time, will not be allowed to take part in the race. Under exceptional circumstances however, which may include setting a suitable lap time in a free practice session, the stewards may permit the car to start the race. Should there be more than one driver accepted in this manner, the grid order will be determined by the stewards”.

Thus it is fair to say that the rule is discretionary, but designed to take out anyone who is deemed to be unfit to compete or a danger to others. The last test in Bahrain showed that the situation is not really dire. On the first day of the Bahrain test the fastest time was a 1m36.880s, which meant a 107 percent lap time of 1m43.661s. All the cars that completed more than 10 laps achieved this lap time. On Day Two the 107 percent time was 1m41.553s and that day the two cars that did not achieve that had both done less than 20 laps apiece. Day Three saw the limit reduce to 1m40.861s. The only man who did a sensible number of laps and did not make it was Marcus Ericsson, but he was doing long runs in his Caterham and not trying for qualifying lap times. On Day Four the 107 percent limit was 1m39.812s and once again anyone who did more than 20 laps managed to achieve that.

Given that there will be three practice sessions before the qualifying and the FIA Stewards have discretionary powers which includes laps set in these sessions, it is clear that the 107 percent rule is very unlikely to be troublesome in Australia.

12 thoughts on “The 107 percent rule

  1. Its possible that Mercedes and Ferrari will raise the bar though surely? They keep saying they’re not chasing laptime yet, so numbers from Bahrain 1 are a moving target. The question is whether the stewards will deem having a Renault engine “exceptional circumstances” 🙂

  2. Sorry, all I can think of now is Mr T shouting “cut your jibber-jabber” in the recent Snickers commercials…

  3. from the outside looking in – and at this stage – it still looks as though whatever the 107% issue that the Mercedes powered teams are going to run away from everyone else until changes to the other Power Units are allowed in due course

  4. Am I misremembering here or wasn’t there a case a few seasons ago where someone didn’t make the 107% during qualy for some mechanical breakdown or similar, but was allowed to start from pit lane/back of grid because they had been fast enough in one of the practice sessions?

  5. Even were the Red Bulls to be well outside of 107% in every practice and qualifying session, would the reining world champion be forced to sit out the race?

    No. The FIA would determine it to be “exceptional circumstances”. Even if the only exceptionable quality present was that of a terribly slow car.

    It’s not right, it’s not fair, but it’s the way the FIA runs their railroad.

  6. If you run the 107% rule down the combined best lap time chart from last week you only get the top 14, with neither Red Bull making the cut. But this is stupid.

    Go to the 2013 Bahrain qualifying and you’ll see that the top time in Q1 was about a second faster than the pole position time, due to tyre choice presumably. Add that second to the top testing time then take 107% and only the Caterhams and Marussias are in danger.

    1. Slower, the top Q1 time was a second slower.

      One day I’ll learn not to try to be intelligent before the first coffee of the morning.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s