Lost in translation

When you fly on an Emirates flight, they are always very keen to tell you the number of languages that the crew members are able to speak between them. I guess that is a good way to make as many people as possible feel at home. Language is a subject that I find fascinating and yet it is also something that is not really required on a plane. You do not need to speak someone’s language to know whether they are a nice person or not. The acid test, I always think, is with regard to the reclining of seats. I don’t have a problem with it – it is your right to do it – but I firmly believe that it is impolite to do it at meal times. People who do not think of it are self-centred and rude. One of the joys of travelling is trying to understand the way other nations and races do things and I have also found it fascinating when one finds words that are “lost in translation”. There are some things that simply do not translate word-to-word and you require a phrase (or even a paragraph) to explain what they mean. I have found that many of these untranslatable words relate to specific emotional states, good and bad, which is why one can get the gist of an explanation without having a single word. Some will tell you that the Danish hyggelig means cosy or homely, but I am told that this does not convey the full nature of the word that implies not simply warmth and a good feeling but also friendship, fire and good  beer. The Germans have schunkeln, which is apparently a verb that relates to swaying from side to side, in time to music, while linking arms with the people on either side of you. The English (and their cousins, who talk in similar fashion) do not have a word for schadenfreude and so borrow the German one for why people laugh at the misfortunes of others. The Germans also have the splendid backpfeifengesicht, which is a descriptive word for a face that needs to be punched. The Russians seem to brood rather a lot and have words for a depth of despair that others do not feel: toska is feeling of great anguish, without any obvious cause. The Germans have a word that describes the feeling of being lost in a great forest, waldeinsamkeit, which is apparently a very specific kind of terror. The Portuguese have the evocative saudade, a mournful feeling of longing for something or someone that you have loved and lost, while the Japanese have wabi-sabi, which is the peaceful acceptance of the natural cycle of life, finding beauty in its imperfections. Further afield, one finds similar words that capture very specific things. In Yagan, the local patois of Tierra del Fuego, in Argentina, they use the word mamihlapinatapei to describe the meaningful look that is shared between two people who want to do the same thing, but are reluctant to make the first move. While the word ilunga in the Tshiluba language in the Congo has been deemed as the world’s most difficult word to translate as it means a person who is unwilling to forgive a third slight (but will put up with two). Another personal favourite is naa, which is a regional expression in the Kansai district of Japan, which is used when you agree with someone. The Japanese also have words for looking worse after a haircut (age-otori) and for the dappled effect that is created when sunlight filters through the leaves of trees (komorebi). The Italians have a very specific word for an old woman who is dedicated to cats (una gattara), while islands in the Pacific also provide us with such useful words as papakata, which on the Cook Islands means having one leg longer (or shorter) than the other; or mokita, which in the Kilivila language of the Trobriand Islands, means “the great truth that we all know about but agree not to talk about”. The best translation I can think of for that is “the elephant in the room”, an American idiom that means that there is something obvious to everyone that is deliberately ignored to avoid trouble. There was a report yesterday in the Shanghai Daily newspaper in China that had a touch of elephantine mokita about it. The story was about the decline in the pulling power of Formula 1 in the Chinese market, following a crowd that was smaller than in 2014. The marketing manager of the race promotion company, a Mr Yang Yibin, reckoned this was caused by big teams dominating too much and smaller teams being unable to make a sensible challenge. Mr Yang said that the current Chinese GP contract runs until after the 2017 event, but added that changes need to be made in the sport if the deal is to be extended. “Maybe we can expect something new when we go into the post-Bernie era,” he said, saying the unsayable. In F1 circles these days there is a lot of mamihlapinatapei with regard to the need for change in F1… and it seems sometimes that everyone wants to see a little more wabi-sabi from the Formula 1 group. Until that happens, however, we are in for more waldeinsamkeit and less hyggelig. The members of the F1 circus are now either in Bahrain,  getting everything ready for the race, or sitting by swimming pools, or in Dubai, waiting to go to Bahrain. Only the real lunatics (and those with cheap tickets) have gone back to Europe for 36 hours…

110 thoughts on “Lost in translation

  1. Interesting piece, Joe. Love backpfeifengesicht; can think of one or two in the paddock who qualify…

  2. Joe

    Great article, had me chasing back to get the meanings of course…. no short term memory…

    I assume you are in Dubai and ready to start the weekend cycle again. Enjoying my Grandprix newsletter from China; thanks to all of you for the hard work.

    Steve

  3. Thats what people do need to understand. Although everyones favorite teams, McLaren, Williams, Red Bull, Ferrari & Mercedes need to play ball to address any of these issues in the sport. They are the ones who have the financial incentive not to break the status quo, and they are the ones who also play a part in setting the sports rules.

    People need to apply heat to these teams collectively as a group. Some of those team principles seriously need their heads smacked together.

    There are solutions. Attractive solutions.

  4. I think the German word “Verschlimmbesserung” – to make things worse when trying to improve them – could apply to many aspects of F1 unfortunately.

  5. The German penchant for compound words can throw up some lovely ones. The other day I encountered the word “dackelschneider” – something which cuts through a dachshund – as the word for a skinny bicycle tyre.

  6. Language is such a fascinating subject, absolutely loved this post, thank you!

    Dare I say it gave me more in 2 minutes that the Chinese Grand Prix did in 90 odd. Not that I’m bemoaning F1, you get excitement and boredom in all forms of sport, China was definitely more an interesting 0-0 than an electrifying 5-4.

    And if there is anyone left in the world that still needs convincing of Hamilton’s class, then I suppose we’ll just leave them in their nice little flat-Earth universe…

    1. “cwtch” was the first one I thought of too, having lived with a Welsh woman for a few years in the past…

  7. Joe, fantastic article.

    “post-Bernie era”, these are very strong words.

    Being a foreigner in the UK for over a good stretch of years I found the British language far more complex that, in paper, it should be. Putting aside PR, the context is everything. The classic example is the “how are you?” it literally means “Hi”, rarely nothing else. I lost count how many times the new foreigner in the county goes on to explain how he/she “really feels” whereas the British person is on his/her best behaviour willing to escape as soon as possible.

  8. Lovely piece Joe! If you fancy beer and a chat with a long time dubai resident this week (if you are in the Emirates) send me an email! I’m buying. Dan

  9. Without doubt one of your best posts ever! Really made me laugh. Thanks for that Joe. Lets hope someone can bring the fight to Lewis this weekend, although I fear he is unstoppable at the moment!

  10. F1 is a bit lost in the forest on multiple fronts at the moment. I think things will straighten out but it needs some seriously solid leadership. A cost cap is an obvious need along with stability in future regs to avoid sudden spikes in budgetary requirements; the haves will always have an advantage but I don’t remember a time when the mid-pack teams struggled this much financially and competitively, nor in which there were no well established minnows. There’s also no real doubt who will win the constructors and individual titles this year, in spite of Ferrari’s resurgence, so the sharp end is pretty boring. Maybe Mercedes’ dominance is skewing my perspective, but it’s almost to the point where a race doesn’t need to be run- just put Merc-Ferrari-Williams in order at 1-6. There just seems to be a lack of competition from top to bottom besides maybe….Sauber and STR? Between F1 and Indycar this is not a great era of exciting open wheel motorsport and that sucks for the fans.

  11. China is the world’s largest market for premium brand motor cars. What’s needed is a Formula One themed entertainment and leisure concept that appeals to the family audience all year as well as educating the factory owners of the sponsorship benefits. Now is the time to promote Global Chinese Brands rather than OEM for foreign companies.
    Ferrari & Mclaren are already doing it…

  12. the suggestion implies you are either a lunatic or have cheap tickets and have scurried back to France. The fact that there’s just a link with this blog suggests that you may be poolside? My money says that’s a red herring however.
    😉 Speaking of languages Joe, I’m assuming that as you live in France, you also speak French? English of course is the language of F1, so it’s not essential to speak anything else for your profession. However I would think knowing a bit of French might help understanding Mr. Todt from time to time, or Austrian German when near a conversation between Lauda and Wolff. Perhaps conversing with either in their native tongue might prove to be interesting? Myself I speak a smattering of Spanish and German, though like yourself, English is far and away the language of use in Key West, although we most likely hear as many as you do from tourists, as well as workers from throughout Eastern Europe.

  13. Lovely, very educational article Joe! Must agree with the airline seats problem. I tend to judge people on whether they are recliners or non-recliners. Non-recliners are obviously thoughtful, courteous and considerate people. Recliners are the devils spawn who are waste of their evil father’s seed.

  14. That’s a really nicely constructed piece Joe.

    Is there ever any serious talk of reintroducing refueling? I always loved the strategic options that it openned up and with all the moaning about managing fuel, tyres and engines that goes on (often unfairly) this might be a way of introducing an extra element to liven up the show?

    What does everyone think?

    1. Within a couple of races, everyone will be on the same strategy – again, just like the last time there was refueling.
      It was predictable, dull, a waste of effort and I genuinely hope to never see refueling in F1 again as long as I live.

      1. Do you find the current product more interesting? Beg to differ, respectfully, on the subject of refueling. It adds another strategic element; i.e., is someone starting on a light tank to gain a few spots because the car lacks pace? How does a particular engine or driver manage fuel loads? Other strategic issues include the weight difference of a full tank and pit crew efficiency. All of which adds a layer of complexity.

  15. Brilliant article.

    In Arabic, the word ‘Taraadin’ means finding a happy solution to a problem in which two parties find a way which ensures both win without losing face.

    The teams need to make Bernie ‘F1 President For Life’, allow him to pontificat all he wants. And then strip him of any power whatsoever.

  16. There is a great Afrikaans (South Africa) word to describe everyone’s inner feeling for the state of modern day F1 … gatvol

  17. In my spotty and insufferable youth I received a gold star from the 5th-form English master for using the word “floccinaucinihilipilification”. I can’t remember what an accumulation of gold stars led to (only ever having got one) but whatever it was, Joe, you deserve a dozen or so for this post. Triffic, really triffic.

  18. May I contribute to this discussion of language my loathing of the habit of journalists of a certain leading English speaking world power to corrupt perfectly clear and understandable terms in common usage to become deranged new non-words?

    For example, instead of the term “performance”, I observe the alleged adjective “performativity” creeping in. Yes, seriously.

    In this nation, properties haven’t been burgled for decades. Rather, they are “burglarized”.

    Moreover, if you feel I am showing inapropriate aggression making these claims, you’re incorrect. It’s actually inappropriate “aggressiveness”.

    Two peoples divided by a common language indeed…

    1. I’ve wondered about “burglarized” for years – it always seems to indicate that the house has been transformed into one or multiple burglars, which is a brilliant image but probably not the one the writer intends to convey.

  19. That was more interesting than this year’s Chinese GP… and it only took a couple of minutes from my life.

  20. What a superb segue from an interesting non-automotive topic into an insightful critique of F1. Brilliant,

  21. Best post ever – i was intrigued to where this might go, but was loving the incredibly flowing & enlightening content before the explosive conclusion

    I salute you Joe!

  22. I take it your typing this on your phone while marching down the Place de la Concorde, having just stepped off an Emirates A380 in Paris ? 😉

    Great article, I can think of a few people who need a punch up the ‘backpfeifengesicht’. I’m gonna try and drop some of those into conversation 🙂

  23. When I went to the first GP of China, in 2004, the stands at turn 1 were packed, all the way around the turn. On Sunday, those seats were covered and apparently not sold. Says a lot about how the race has lost some of its luster over the years.

  24. Once upon a time in a BBC TV studio, an elephant was invited into a children’s entertainment show. While this elephant was in the room, it dropped the entire contents of its bowels on live TV.

    On that occasion everyone was happy to talk about the elephant. No one mentioned the enormous turd which now occupied the room and no one was brave enough to step in an clear up the mess.

    This is actually where F1 is at the moment.

    As always, a great story Joe.

    1. Remembered…Blue Peter.
      The young heffalump then decided to amble off to the other side of the studio, the keeper tried to haul him in, and lost traction on the kack, and landed in it.

  25. Meanwhile back in the UK me and a few others spent a weekend watching the WEC,ELMS and European F3 show at Silverstone and what a great event it was with access all areas.The spectacle was superb with LMP1 cars mixing it with GTE cars and a tremendous finale to the main event after 6 hours.Lets see hour Silverstone feels in June when the GP comes to town and the Security triples and the circus locks itself away in the Paddock infield

  26. Mr. Yang Yibin should be congratulated for his honesty. The Germans have another wonderful expression that can be applied wholesale to F1, Ecclestone, Todt, the FIA, several teams, sponsors, and a few drivers: Scheiße bauen.

    Off you go to Google Translate…

  27. Fascinating article, really enjoyed it and I must try and work some of those words into conversation! But, with regard to a loss of interest in F1 in China and greater hopes for a post-Bernie era, I’m afraid I don’t see that as just a Chinese problem. Bernie has done some great things for the show but with each passing year he seems, in my view, to be doing far more harm than good. I think he either has his own 100& personal agenda or he’s losing it. Not sure which!

  28. Great article and comment Joe.

    I would suggest that if Bernie and his minions are really concerned about the image of F1, they come and sit with me in front of my TV as I watch the farcical presentation on MSNBC. Farcical – certainly, with second rate propaganda presentation from three likeable puppets, and one smart technical observer.
    I have been around long enough to understand the $$$$ driving tv stations, and their demands to meet their perceived advertisers requirements.

    The medals of mediocrity can be equally shared buy all who are putting together such farcical representations of the ultimate in motor sport.While I still see F1 drivers-cars and the events on historical circuits as top’s, I find watching the six nations rugby, – and premium soccer, highlights of the recent Cricket World cup and even the farce of Americas cup racing without advertising and time delayed, better viewing.

    If Bernie wants to stop the decline in TV viewers he needs pay attention to how he is allowing for the presentation of the events. Pay a premium – discount to the networks to have an uninterrupted viewing after the five red lights go out – (As a competitor I always enjoyed the competition between the starter using a flag, and the drivers) till after the chequered flag drops. I would put up with the babbling head commentators, I get good with the mute.

  29. Best post in a long time, Joe and given your usually excellent mix of insight and acerbic wit, that’s saying a lot!
    Keep up the great work; F1 wouldn’t be half as interesting or entertaining without your”tuppence worth”!

  30. Uh oh 🙂

    I’ve studied “inter-culture management” (and worked in multi-national companies, of course), so having appreciation for the words above. The more you know about other nations, the more you are critical about your own nation. And having bigger picture means being arrogant for many other people.

    People live is small boxes. So small boxes. So do managers of Formula One. And not only different nations have something to do with it.

  31. Joe, regarding reclining seats, have you noticed it’s usually the people of Bernie’s height that insist on reclining their seats to give themselves more “leg” room. My other pet peeve on flights are the selfish buggers in window seats who keep their blinds open on long haul flights when the rest of us are trying to sleep. Re F1 it has rather lost me I am afraid, sounds like the WEC race at Silverstone was a better spectacle than Shanghai from all accounts.

  32. Here in Aus on qantas seats must be in the upright position at meal times and cabin crew come around checking all seats are up and forcing people to if they have not already done. I thought this was standard practice (and really people should have the manners to do it anyway)

  33. Respect. I love the words you mentioned, Joe, and often quote “hygge”, “saudade” etc. in my lectures. Yet you excel in having a much more comprehensive list, and then apply it to F1.

    It is helpful to understand that we do not understand each other always. The words you cited, often signifying emotional states or states of consciousness are a case in point.

    And yes, I do notice the same thing on each Emirates flight with bemusement.
    😉

    Rarely there is an article anywhere I can agree with 100% – this is one such masterpiece.

  34. What a truly thoughtful and reflective article. Interesting. Thanks! A nice break from the “Weimar Republic” that Formula 1 has become. What irony that China may turn its back on Formula 1, but one would suppose if Formula 1 was so unwilling to accommodate the U.S. as a venue for so many years that they would be any less willing to accommodate China.

  35. For someone moving around the globe as much as you are doing this week, this post is incredible.
    I’m stealing a few of these words and using them in everyday conversation starting today.

    And let’s hope Post-Bernie F1 takes the necessary steps to put it back on top. Last Sunday was an eye opener with China and WEC at Silverstone in the same day. The differences were startling, and I was watching them both from a far away…

  36. Speaking of F1’s pulling power in China, has there ever been much? From watching on TV, there always seem to be large expanses of empty grandstands.

    1. Yep, turn 4, 5 or 6, (not sure which it is.. google tells me it is turn thirteen ! the long right hand before the long straight), the grandstands on the outside never have anyone in them and the rest of the place looked only 25% full at best.

  37. I find so much in English lost in translation and though long sufferers of the trauma caused by skipping past my comments may laugh a different way, with me for much that stretch …. I have become convinced that the human strain simply cannot absorb conceptually different types of understanding readily.

    I don’t fear the abdication of human thought to artificial intelligence. I fear that non or inhuman thought may prove to be more useful to such a extent it marginalizes our capacity for novel appreciation. And in so doing is attrition to our human holistic conceptions.

    I spent a few years studying the history of artificial intelligence and learned more what people hoped it would create than what it could do. Because the conceptual languages were often iterations of logic applied to illogic of mere mortals. The vocabulary reflects that. Counter or contra factuals… For one favorite bugbear … The idea of conflicts with and within experiential knowledge. Holding contrary thoughts. But we don’t process such things that way. We create higher level things like idioms. They do not deconstruct readily or often at all.

    We can all be persuaded of very odd things. I will not claim exception.

    But when we want to communicate with another higher lèvel with which there is some kind of impedence mismatch, I find we often as not never processed the underlying facts very well.

    I’ll have some better examples If anyone bites on my frustrating and frustrated comment. It’s a beautiful morning and I just wanted clocked off so will abscond until I may approach any responses helpfully.

    My worry is that simpler but more exclusive logic prevails.

    This is not anything unheard of in formative civilizations. But I’m concerned how the myths of computer priesthood still in evidence aplenty, causes already a determination of life we ought to better understand.

    Simple version? “Computer says no!”

    And we laugh at that comédienne because we think we’re laughing at another person.

    But for how long will be be able to challenge the taxonomy of this humour?

    Because the joke is in fact a counter factual we may process at different levels and recreate as a même.

    How beautiful the world way be once we forget the way we believe we see.

    Maybe it is only in love we understand both the madness and the concrete truths all mixed up as a single concept universal?

    And that may explain I lot of arguments when that universality unravels.

    We maybe need a taxonomy for incomprehension of F1 also. But go inclined to think it’s the same big old ugly problem which is indigestible or lacks internal symmetry or orthogonality or a homogeneous geometry.

    We are all I think just plain bad at deconstruction of higher ideas.

    I began one year to think some MIT guys sought to make the machine code for “arsehole” and that may be to some a recognizable rift that led to modern (if I was born modern forty years ago) UNIX.

    Those so disposed to laugh at me with pathos I would probably love to sit and share a mutual cognitively diminishing beverage with.

    Those less so inclined I humbly recommend that I once enjoyed a life of reading aphorism and bon mots. Judiciaire dedans ridicules sont comprises les absolutes.

    Pardon moi bloody awful franglais but the had a good run at some of these subjects and my memory is suffering from bit rot just like slowly every means we have to store our simple ones and noughts is ever closer to quantum uncertainty.

      1. My number is…..

        Actually, the problem I was describing, is reflexive to the way I tried to describe it.

        On one level of breaking it down:

        e.g. I was trying very hard to cut across a number of concepts, and you can see my typing suffer, even on the sentences I really should have gotten down right. (correction follows)

        example 2nd: I have very few outlets for a decade plus work and research that happened in a degree of isolation, because there were few people in academia prepared to speak (even to this day) about a once highly embarrassing period of development. It’s made worse because guys like Brin and Page popularized the readily solved parts of !=A.I as A.I. Actually likely not them, but how could marketing be denied, they had the right characters, and it covered a lack of human understandability for two such young men with such temporal power. Concretely, expert systems or heuristics got passed for “machine intelligence”, later search primatives were replaced by what in banking is called flow trading: Google and everyone cares more to follow where you end up searching, having decided yourself what you want, than to embed any actual logic in the original results. Once banks did that, with flow trading – which is seeing where the herd is going (made infinitely easier inside my memory) they traded until a kind of singularity of High Frequency Trading.

        …. therefore, well, unless I unravel a awful lot, I am smiled at very nicely by all ages…

        example 3rd: Reflexivity, of many kinds of symmetric or apparently symmetric systems, are not rarely neatly interchangeable. We abstract away details and that’s a great deal of humanity. I think these were the big concepts of e.g. Church Calculus in applications, of the first fully feathered (some say only) generation of AI researchers. Ever had a great drunken conversation without hardly any language in common? I think Joe’s excellent essay is about something the opposite: humans lacking the good intent. I’ve printed it into a notebook I keep of examples, when I am asked, or seek to try teaching, it is that good. This joins excerpts from Douglas Hofstadter’s works, and some very high calibre theoreticians. Because it’s real, and beautifully encapsulates, eloquently, a human factor which we can readily keep going back to. That’s not a big notebook, it’s a “Red and Black A-Z A4” I have not filled yet since 1998 when I brought across my updates.

        But, yes, you are right, I could do with something that put me that way, too, and at least let me “feel” or convince myself I had made some use of a awful lot of apparently worthless life. I had spent the night talking with a younger friend, but heck not by much and nor would I think myself younger at his age… finding out from him, his sadness that in his culture he cannot be accepted if he were to say his 2yr old son, very well cared for by my sights, and the reason unlike his peers, he pays attention and actually asks me things about my work (I have, at least now I definitely have told him what slim chance that may help him, repeatedly) is chromosomally not his son, in this binary life of ours. Our last words were hoarse, mine were that we both got stuck in a ghetto. I think we were very high from crossing a lot of otherwise impenetrable cultural and cognitive boundaries. Unfortunately that comes with a big downer, too.

        Just in case the first point never counted:

        I think that the tenets of Artificial Intelligence research may have some major problems.

        …. we have been sold a lot of different things as being AI…

        …. there grew a culture of “good enough” out of, in part, reaction to the “MIT school of thought”…

        …. computers armed with lots of data are very good at “good enough”….

        …. which, to boot with the perceptive training, may incline us to early satisfaction in the results….

        …. I fear could create the kind of anaemia in which essays such as the above, start to have no broader meaning…

        …. I imagined friends wondering how to programme the airline seats to “behave” correctly…

        My understanding of a area of Science Fiction authors, Robert Heinlein springs to mind, but I did my reading too long ago, were concerned with humanity surviving in a fully automated world, or a perfected world. Most writers I recall were less than optimistic.

        Because I have no other adequate means to sign off, it may be possible the considerable tolerance permitted me by Joe, extends from a similar kind of appreciation. At least, on a hunch, I have given up attempting to dissect the ephemera of F1, for the near now. I hazard to say we may even have a commonality, in being sons of, in deeply contracting ways, men of religious study. Therein aplenty is found so much of the needs of forbearance in equal to absolute. I tripped over a few possibilities of unrelated and dissimilar similarities, one that quietened me a good while. But I can find no computable reason I am allowed here. Or anywhere else…

        argh! not done the sign off so it’s this: Nail On Head, I don’t think contemporary history regards psychoactive drugs sufficiently to see the influences. I’ve dabbled, it bores quick, I guarantee you that. But a damned sight was thereby influenced. However, this is a thing I mistook: I thought for a long time that computers were somehow touched by psychedelics. Just chance of location, in very rough geography and time. But that was a stupidity I invented as a long haired teen, with no access to relevant history. It turns out that almost every significant mind, of the early days through to my days, was a child of strictest mid west religion. I’m still pondering on that, in fact in the above contexts, also.

        and finally, I typo’d the one line I probably could have left alone:

        “How beautiful the world may be, once we forget the way we see.”

  38. Where would we be without you, Joe? Stuck with “Lewis said this about Nico” stories and the like… Cheers.

  39. I always thought as a dutch that ‘gezellig’ was unique to us. ‘Hyggelig’ seems to be the danish equivalent.

  40. That was an interesting and funny post Joe, with a side of commonsense added…..just wish the navel gazers in F1 could look out far enough to see what a stupid situation they have created, and how unsustainable it is.
    I think I’ve watched about 20-30 laps of a race this year so far, and that was Sepang, and not very exciting for me. Bernie has just about lost me as a watcher on tv, and the costs of spectating have been so high for a long time, that I haven’t been to an F1 race for several years. That is what is going on with the fanbase, and it isn’t great for the future of Bernie’s wallet, time he realised this fact!

  41. Great article, Joe.

    I love learning foreign words; a lot of the time you can see someone relax more if you can greet them with the same language.

    I would equate the Tshiluba word ‘Ilunga’ to one of my favourite phrases: “Once is a happening. Twice is coincidence. But three times, three times is enemy action.”

    After the Blackadder assertation that the Germans do not have a word for fluffy, it is nice and affirming to learn that there is one for swaying to music, etc.

    Great stuff. Thank you for sharing.

    Hope things are sorting themselves out for you.

  42. What about people who don’t raise their seatbacks during landing! I don’t think it’s intentional rudeness; I believe a lot of people (say, 30%) go through life more or less completely obivious to their fellow human beings.

    Fascinating wordsmith column BTW.

  43. Hi Joe,
    Great article, i was going to write that i thought the Yagan people were no more but a internet research shows there are a couple of 100 left, i am not sure if that makes me happy or sad, but great article

  44. Reclining seats in planes is a bit of a divisive issue to be an acid test to judge whether a person is nice or not. As a somewhat taller and bigger person, I think it is almost always impolite/inconsiderate to recline your seat (unless maybe a shorter person or kid is behind you or the plane’s seating is more generous than on average). The person behind has as much right – or more in my mind – to their leg room and general table-area room as the person in front has to recline.

    Sorry, this is a bit of a pet peeve of mine. I know a lot of people would disagree with my view. Though I agree with your point that anyone who reclines during meal times is definitely a self-centered jerk.

    1. The absolute worst is sitting for twelve hours on the way to NZ next to a really obese person who should have bought two seats. I cringe to remember the hot grease dripping on to me……..

  45. Don’t forget another German favourite..

    “drachenfutter” – the gift of flowers or jewelery a husband needs to offer the angry dragon when he returns home late form the pub.

  46. I found that with the selective use of text selection and the search text function (Ctrl F) I could break your cypher. Perhaps with a younger brain I could have done it manually.
    Ah the post-Bernie era (you said it out loud!), will we look back at the BE and miss the simplicity of totalitarianism?
    Entertaining stuff. I don’t envy your air miles or difficulty spearing dinner under an inclined plane.

  47. “The Japanese also have words for looking worse after a haircut (age-otori) ”
    From my Pioneer days: You could immediately tell anyone who had been back to Japan for re-programming as they exhibited the most awful haircuts on their return to Greenford. They all grew their hair as long as possible in between Japan trips. Most rented out their homes whilst stationed in the UK and made a fortune as they also got overseas pay, just about doubling their salary.

  48. ” The Germans also have the splendid backpfeifengesicht, which is a descriptive word for a face that needs to be punched. ” Ja ve hef often zeen dis after die races.

  49. The German vernacular is replete with compound words which perfectly describe concepts for which other languages need a sentence or two. My favourite is “Sitzpinkler”, meaning a man who sits down to urinate; the term being used to imply that someone is unmasculine or henpecked. In an F1 context, perhaps less charitable Stuttgarters might apply this term to someone who complains that the car in front is going too slow, but doesn’t actually try to overtake it …?

  50. Joe has written a very entertaining article, which we have all been able to read for free, and all some miserable s*ds can do is complain about the lack of paragraphs. Your faces are indeed accurately described as “backpfeifengesicht”.

    1. Agreed – I wonder if we can create a compound word for ‘a person who implies by their actions that they have a backpfeifengesicht’…!

    2. You know, I found the article so interesting and enjoyable, I never even noticed any lack of paragraphs! I actually had to scroll up to see what those “backpfeifengesicht” targets were moaning about!

      1. Which only works the first time, if at all, as regards the SWMBO*, but gets repeated endlessly, as it gives the geek bearing the gift some (self perceived) high…err, well, slightly above sea level, moral ground during the following morning’s combination of hangover and ‘hot tongue/cold shoulder’:-)
        Always thought returning late from the pub (about once every 6montbs) poor tactics and smart strategy. Tactically, it get’s one in the smelly stuff up to one’s eyeballs for a day or two. Now strategically- a different matter. If one isn’t a bit naughty on occasion, SWMBO will soon raise the bar, and, what was once good behaviour compared to arriving home late from the pub, in its absence, becomes the minimum standard. And, so the bar gets raised…….:-)
        Says he who doesn’t drink, (because at 54 the hangovers last 3 days), and, who, for some strange reason, is single:-)
        Cheers
        MarkR

  51. As a german whose mother language has brought up so many funnies already i would love to add the japanese “kurisumasu keki クリスマスケーキ”. The term comes from the english “christmas cake” and was used for japanese women who weren’t married after their 25th birthday … like nobody wants the cake after the 25th (of December).
    A funny fact in german language are the “english” words we are using that actually aren’t english vocabs at all. Cell phones are called “Handy” for example and a tuxedo is called “Smoking” here, both words pronounced in an english way.

  52. there is a little 5 mm gap in the joint of the passenger seat, which as sitting behind you can see.

    when boarding, fit a little stone in there and the person in front cannot recline the seat….! they will think its broken and stop trying after a few secs!

  53. Wow, great post! I love how you can tie in such a cross-cultural explanation of language to the very current state of F1. Which, come to think of it, is itself cross-cultural. In any case, well done!

    Marty

Leave a reply to John B. Cancel reply