Notebook from TGI Fridays

IMG_0051It’s six in the morning (or it was when I started writing this) and here in Pulkovo Airport in St Petersburg, TGI Fridays is quiet. The coffee machine is broken, which doesn’t help attract business, but the waitress is placidly friendly and helpful and the apple juice is spectacular, as it seems to have involved some real apples at some point in the not-too-distant past.

There are a couple of things going for the 02.20 flight out of Sochi to St Petersburg: firstly, it’s not as bad as the 03.30 to Moscow, nor the 04.00 to Istanbul; secondly, Pulkovo is a small, modern airport and it’s less painful than the venerable Moscow airports,which are reminiscent of another age. Either way, one can get home by midday, which is a bonus given that we didn’t leave the circuit until midnight. Another bed-less night is no big deal in the F1 world at this time of year…

So, anyway, I’m watching the World Bartender Championship, simply because I don’t have the energy not to. A Polish reporter who was on the same flight has passed by and we briefly discussed the fact that we are sitting close to the birthplace of motorsport in Russia. You have to be a uber-fan to know this sort of stuff, but a mile or two south of the airport is a road called the Volkhonskoye Shosse, or Волхонское шоссе if you go native. This runs from Strelna, up on the coast, all the way down to Alexandrovskaya, where the Catherine Palace, the summer home of the Tsars of Imperial Russia, is located. The road is a 13-mile long straight and it was used for the first Russian motor race in October 1898. For the record, it was won by Pavel Belyaev riding a Clément tricycle, who completed the up-and-back course at a stately 16.9 mph, despite some snow. It’s snowy a lot in St Petersburg. There were even a few hints of it on the ground when we flew in on the way to Sochi.

Russia is a big country. It was three hours and 25 minutes flying from Paris to St Petersburg, and it’s three hours from St Petersburg to Sochi.

Down in Sochi, there was snow on the mountains, but on the coast it was warm and sunny. This is not surprising when one considers that the city is on the same latitude as Nice and Biarritz, so at this time of year it should be delightful. I didn’t go down to walk by the sea, but I am told that on a good day, you will see dolphins swimming offshore.

I’ve not been a fan of the race in Sochi up to now, but I have continued to visit because I believe that the duty of an F1 reporter (a proper one) is to go to all the races. Lots of people stay at home and write as though they are present, but I’m afraid I find that completely fraudulent. This year there seemed to be a few more journalists in the Media Centre, but a closer look revealed that the number of international media was probably down a little on last year, but there were a lot more Russians. That is a good sign because it indicates that Russia is getting into F1 a little more. The crowd on Sunday was 60,000, with 150,000 passing through the gates in the course of the weekend. I’m told that President Vladimir Putin was keen to find out whether the drivers on the F1 podium thought that there were more Russian fans than before. Sebastian and Kimi apparently said that this seemed to be the case, while Valtteri (quite rightly) said that he was enjoying being a race winner and had not really thought about such a question. Putin seems to like being on the podium each year – which is one of the reasons I always felt uncomfortable about the race.

Screen Shot 2017-05-03 at 12.10.09.pngThis year, however, the podium provided the GP+ photographer Peter Nygaard with a chance to show his genius, with a spectacular photograph (right) which appeared in GP+, which should win a lot of awards this year.

If you want to see more of his work, go to www.grandprixphoto.com.

Anyway, one of the reasons that F1 people didn’t much like Sochi was that most of them stay in the old Olympic precinct, where you never feel that you are experiencing the real Russia. This year, because of rampant gouging by the airlines and a dubious cancellation of hotel reservations (because they wanted to raise the prices), I ended up arriving a day early and moving about a kilometre, from one side of the circuit to the other. It made a world of difference because the west side of the track was actually in Russia, while the east side is in this strange Disney-like vacuum world. It was fun to try to communicate with the Russians. One evening, for example, I asked for the bill at the end of dinner and ended up another beer instead! I didn’t understand why they constantly played ‘All I want for Christmas is you’ on the hotel tannoy and I never did comprehend why the whole place was billed as being a ‘boutigue hotel’, but it really didn’t matter. I felt connected to real Russians and was much happier as a result. I’ll be back there next year…

The first note in the green notebook over the weekend was “buy a new green notebook” because the current one is beginning to fall apart. The spine has detached itself from the cover and there are only a few pages left for my scribblings.

The big news of the weekend was the Sauber-Honda deal, which was not a great surprise. It has taken a long time to put it all together but the announcement tends to suggest that McLaren and Honda will be staying together because part of the deal was for Sauber to buy McLaren gearboxes, which wouldn’t be much use if McLaren was switching to Mercedes. Whether or not Mercedes will be helping Honda with technology is a separate question, but I know I am not going to get an answer to that one. If we see a major improvement on Honda by the end of the season one will be able to surmise, with some accuracy, that Honda might have had a little help. This sort of thing is quite normal in the industry, where companies buy technology from one another all the time, to save time and costs, but when it comes to F1 there is a sort of corporate ego that gets in way of people admitting they cannot do things that their rivals can.

Rumour-wise things were pretty quiet. Bernie Ecclestone turned up but once again kept a remarkably low profile, perhaps understanding that saying too much might not please the new owners of the sport and the last thing Mr E wants is to have a pass that makes the wrong noise when he tries to get into the paddock. Actually, that will probably never happen because the new owners are admitting more people into the paddock these days and will be doing more of the same at all races. There are some interesting new developments going on to try to give fans a better deal, including – so I am told – a little more showbiz, some t-shirt guns, pyrotechnics and even some two-seater F1 cars. There is also a developing plan to have Mercedes AMG cars whizzing around tracks, giving fans ‘taxi’ rides. It is all part of a vision to be more fan-friendly. There is also going to be a big push to market the F1 brand a lot more. In the past this sort of thing has been minimal.

We’re still waiting to see about the way the calendar will develop, but we hope that there will be a list of dates for 2018 as early as possible and that we don’t have to wait until December as has been the norm. Next year we know we will lose Malaysia, but we will get Germany and France back, so that means 21 races. My feeling is that the goal is to push up the number of races over the next few years. That will only be possible if they design the calendar better.

It is interesting to note that there has been one very quiet impact as a result of Formula 1 becoming (at least in a legal sense) a US-based company, quoted on the NASDAQ stock exchange in New York. Since 2014 a number of Russian individuals and companies have been listed for sanctions by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control. These include Boris and Arkady Rotenberg who, according to the US government “have provided support to Putin’s pet projects by receiving and executing high price contracts for the Sochi Olympic Games and state-controlled Gazprom.  They have made billions of dollars in contracts for Gazprom and the Sochi Winter Olympics awarded to them by Putin.  Both brothers have amassed enormous amounts of wealth during the years of Putin’s rule in Russia.  The Rotenberg brothers received approximately $7 billion in contracts for the Sochi Olympic Games and their personal wealth has increased by $2.5 billion in the last two years alone”. US companies are not allowed to do business with those who are sanctioned and so the Formula 4 race that was due to be run in support of the Grand Prix was axed because it is promoted by a Rotenberg company. Boris was much in evidence in the F1 Paddock over the weekend, in company with two rather hefty-looking individuals with earpieces, who even managed to get out on to the grid in Sochi.

The driver market is still pretty quiet, although the future of Fernando Alonso is much discussed at the moment, with the suggestion being that he has had a serious offer for employment from Renault for 2018 and beyond. This makes sense, although McLaren is still hoping to employ him. There seems to be little or no interest in his services from Ferrari, Mercedes and Red Bull. No-one doubts his driving skills, but it seems that his team-building talents are not highly-rated.

The odd thing about the Russian GP, on the race track, was that up to Sochi Mercedes had had the advantage in qualifying and Ferrari in the race. In Russia the roles reversed. The most notable element outside the big two teams was the fact that Red Bull Racing was well off the pace – and also not very reliable. The word is that Adrian Newey has been stung into action in recent weeks after the team’s poor performances. The theory is that Adrian has been wrapped up in the Aston Martin Valkyrie programme in the course of the six months and this meant that the F1 car did not get much of his attention. Now that it is not doing well, that is not good for the Newey reputation, so he’s back on the gas big time in an effort to close the gap. Clearly, Red Bull is pushing hard. The word in Sochi was that Ben Waterhouse, the deputy technical director of Scuderia Toro Rosso, has left the Italian operation and will shortly take up a new role at Red Bull Racing, as a member of the Milton Keynes team’s vehicle dynamics department, under Pierre Waché.

Now, I’m off to find a new green notebook…

69 thoughts on “Notebook from TGI Fridays

  1. Good news on changing digs for the GP: I love staying with locals when I travel. Just read my first Dostoyevsky novel too, so Russia has also risen in appeal as a destination at this end.

    1. Brilliant photo, well done. Part of my job is to photograph architectural failures which sometimes necessitates standing in awkward positions in unfavourable weather conditions. I do however have time to compose my shot and adjust camera settings. Mr Nygaard does not have the luxury of time and there are added difficulties associated with the pressure of the situation and difficult lighting angles.

    2. Great photo Peter! I would be interested in reading an article in GP+ about photographing a F1 weekend if that’s possible?

      Thanks for the notebook as well Joe. Always essential reading!

      Regarding Putin I hope next year we can watch an entire race without the footage cutting away to see him arriving. I’m beginning to wonder if it’s part of the race contract to see his glorious arrival?

  2. Enjoy reading the tidbits in the notebook not presented elsewhere and lots of luck with finding a new one.

  3. Hats off to your resilience and sense of duty. This is clearly not a career for softies or folks attached to their home comforts. We are often jealous in the extreme, but bed-less nights in airports are an instant anti-dote for all that.

    As for Putin, so many people are down on him for turning up for the race. All it does is raise the profile of the event. It may raise his own at the same time, but if he didn’t show up he would be failing to promote F1 in Russia; a lose/lose situation.

    1. All the despots who pay for the gig, tend to turn up on the podium. But it is odd how Putin has muscled his way into the Green room before the prize giving. Presumably, part of a “special” negotiation with Bernie.

      Now that Ron has been co-opted into a technology role for the Government, perhaps Bernie should be lined up as head Brexit negotiator against M Barbier.

      1. i guess Bernard Charles Emeritus would do better deal for the UK to stay rather than for exit

    2. Interestingly enough, the first year it was the very first story on the Russian evening news, with most of the coverage focusing on Putin’s role in bringing the GP to Russia and his tour of the facilities. Over the last couple of years it’s still featured in the evening news but lower down; this time round it was the final story, with some shots of Putin presenting the cup but mainly a report of the race.

      According to the news, he also found time to play ice hockey and meet representatives of Pirelli while he was down in Sochi – on top of his duties back in Moscow in the morning – so it seems Valtteri Bottas wasn’t the only one who had a busy Sunday!

      1. Yes and then met German PM at Sochi

        On another note FA Indy 500 test is over and his in, ran 221.500 with no problem in the car that was not in full race trim. Live on U-Tube

  4. Serendipity or careful planning to get that shot I wonder?

    Alonso’s travails embody the wisdom of “be careful how you treat people on your way up…”

    At least in his Indy team he has five times as many team mates to throw it into the wall as and when he requires.

      1. What makes you think he’s criticizing? Both are valid ways of getting a good shot as any photographer will tell you. It’s a perfectly valid question.

      2. An entirely unloaded question Joe, made only in a spirit of enquiry. I subscribe to Ross Brawn’s definition of luck being mostly preparation.

        Or is it my implicit criticism of Alonso that offends?

        Both yourself and DT seem a mite over sensitive this week, must be the jet lag.

        1. Not sensitive at all. Just busy. Don’t kid yourself that your views are powerful enough to sway moods

          1. Joe,
            I really enjoy your writing, your insights and this website but the above comment and ones like it are really not on. For someone in the business of communication you seem to take comments the wrong way entirely and then insult the innocent party further when they clarify they meant no offence. If you are busy why take the time to have a go at someone who was posing simple question? and then go on to belittle them?

            I am sure (as you have pointed out above) my comments will have no impact on the way you behave to people but I felt you were quite in the wrong with the replies you gave to Mr Kitchen and to be honest for someone who expects certain standards from those who use this site I would hope you conduct yourself better.

            Stuart.

            1. I did not react to someone asking a simple question. I reacted to someone who was saying that DT and I are overly sensitive. That may have been light-hearted but you cannot be sure in such comments. So I replied in a similar fashion. You can read it with humour (if you have humour). We are not overly sensitive. We’re simple human beings who sometimes react to people who snipe, criticize or resort to rudeness. DT will tell you that I am patient to a degree that is beyond earthly powers… but people who read these comments seem to think I am some kind of Tartar who hangs small children and jumps up and down on the fingers of pianists.

              The way I see it, is really very simple. Readers have a choice. They can have comments with whatever reaction they get – or no comments at all. The latter choice is easier and no effort for me because comments add limited value for me apart from the knowledge that I am interacting. Once in a while we will all learn something from a comment, but most do not provide insight. A proportion of them are snide, critical or just downright rude. Lots of people don’t bother reading the rules and post links when they are told not to. Now and then, as I wade though it all, I wonder why I do it. The answer is that I believe we should try to interact with fans. Occasionally I respond sharply. Then I am a bad person. So it seems that only one-way insulting is allowed. My colleagues think I’m mad to waste my energy in this way. I have fought against their attitude since the blog began. My goal is to create a readership that is able to communicate in an intelligent fashion, without being rude to me or to one another. Maybe it is an impossible wish because the Internet allows every mouse to be a lion and behave in a way they would never behave face-to-face.

              Your schoolmasterly lecture on how I ought to behave serves only to motivate me to click the “No comments allowed” box and by doing so allow myself a better life.

              1. It’s impossible to disagree with you in one sense. Looking at sites who don’t respond to comments they seem to ‘motor on’ regardless, leaving fans to fight it out between themselves. James Allen for example, who only offers the occasional reply. By giving fans the possibility of a response you will indeed be open to abuse but, then again, you are one of a dwindling number of accredited journalists which will dwindle further the more F1 loses contact with its audience. Like it or not, other journalists should be interacting more with fans, not less, in the same way the F1 itself should be. Your colleagues are wrong. Totally. That leaves you Joe fighting everyone else’s corner for them, which may appear to be completely unjust but inevitable in the circumstances.

    1. I don’t think Alonso’s perceived reputation from some viewing from the outside is necessarily warranted. He’s been in four teams in Formula 1, excluding Minardi and a tempestuous first run at McLaren, he spent 5 seasons at the Scuderia and 4 at Renault.

      RBR is never going to hire any of the big three as they have their own program, Renault would like him back, Mclaren obviously got over 2007, (which was in many ways their own doing) and I would imagine that if either Mercedes or Ferrari were to find themselves without LH or SB he’d have to be the top of their list to hire or rehire.

      Fact is none of the big boys would like another big dog in their garage, especially him, the only two that wouldn’t mind curiously enough would be Dan and Max, but I suppose for them he’d be a great yardstick and that’s not going to happen at RB.

      I think his work at Mclaren this time around has well and truly layed the ghosts of 2007 to rest, the guy is still on top of his game and it’s not like the five years at Ferrari were a walk in the park either. Imagine their results without him during those years.

      Good luck at Indy Nando, it takes balls to do what you’re doing, but if Rossi can do it so can you. I hope you get the triple.

    2. As Louis Pasteur said – and Ansel Adams often quoted – “Chance favours the prepared mind.”

  5. Hi Joe, any thoughts on the fact that only Adrian Newey is capable of putting together a competitive Red Bull car and what that may say about the depth of the Red Bull design/technical team?

  6. Interesting the way Putin greeted our deposed dictator Bernie with a warm hug but Carey got only a polite handshake. I seem to recall from old newsreels that prominent Russians males greeted each other with a kiss on the lips.

    Don’t know if that practice is still alive. If it is then maybe that big moustache will serve to protect CC from the all too gooey.

    1. It’s probably a case of Putin knowing where the skeleton’s are buried in exactly the same way that BCE has similar knowledge about F1 and other
      expensive preoccupations. Those two know perfectly well the sort of power
      struggles and intrigue the other has been deeply involved in. People quickly
      learned not to openly cross Putin in exactly the same way as others learned
      to avoid upsetting BCE. In the one case you could find your life shortened
      very suddenly. In the other, you career and future prospects would suddenly
      cease to exist.

      By comparison with those two, and for all his vast ability and nous, Carey
      is a child at the circus in their company. But a child who already knows for
      certain that he does not have any desire whatsoever to be involved in any aspect of their murky world.

  7. re the Photo: A good photographer knows how to get in position and when to pull the trigger,surprisingly luck plays a small part in creating the art. How many missed how clever that photo really is,It took me a second to catch it.

    1. Yes, that’s an awesome photo. Funny how the best photographers always find themselves in the right place to get the ‘lucky’ shot 😉

  8. I am watching the “You Tube” transmition of Alonso at Indy now, do you know if they will be showing the race as well as I can’t afford BT Sport and Sky F1

  9. Joe, any comment on whether there’s any truth behind Helmut Marko’s insinuation that Renault are giving themselves better engines than RBR or STR get?

    – IIRC, Renault say the hardware is the same, and under a single homolgation (contrary to some of the preseason rumours).

    – I don’t know if they’d be allowed to hold back some software modes for themselves (or if in fact Red Bull do their own, in which case it’s probably better than Renault have)?

    – Are there still meaningful difference between individual engines that Renault could exploit, or do quality control improvements mean that they’re all essentially identical these days?

    – Or, are RBR losing out because they’ve gone with a different fuel & lubricants supplier? Unless RBR are paying an additional fee on top of the standard customer engine contract price, I can’t see why there would be any incentive at all for Renault to tailor the engine to suit Exxon…

    And as an aside – I can’t remember another F1 car before the STR12 which ran without at least a small courtesy sticker in recognition of the team’s fuel supplier. Or engine supplier, come to that. (And, yes, I know the engine is officially a ‘Toro Rosso’, since the team bought out the naming rights and then failed to sell them on, but I’m still surprised they’ve buried the naming instead of using it for some kind of sub-brand a la Playlife). Is this as odd as I think it is, or have I just not noticed before?

    1. Pure speculation here…

      While I think that their engines are physically the same with all the same “modes” – I don’t think it would be a stretch to assume that the actual factory team has slightly more optimized engine maps/software to everyone else.

      I suspect the same of Mercedes – post 2014 after Williams actually challenged for some poles…

  10. Brilliant Notebook as always, although this one could qualify as “Novella from TGI Fridays”.

  11. I am still very surprised that Honda is so far “off”. Certainly that does their reputation no good, which is counter to much of the reason that they came back. I’m sure they didn’t think it would work out like it has either. However, a 100hp deficit? Just what have they been doing?!?! Mystifying…

    I am also surprised about wanting to add to the number of races. Weren’t there a number of team officials that said 20-21 is about the limit without the added expense of increasing the head count to provide for rotating personnel?

    1. I reckon if anyone is given the job of taking the 1.6 turbo, and the eH & eK, and with the restrictions on boost, fuel-flow, rpm, other(?), and getting power up to and beyond what Merc & Ferrari have achieved battling hard against each other eeking out every last HP over the last few years, it’d be a very tall order. I’m not surprised they’re down on total HP by comparison.

  12. I thought i walked past A Newey in nyc early last week. I thought it must have been a figment of my imagination, assuming he’d be chained to his drawing board until results improved. maybe it was him?

  13. I’m beginning to wonder if the F in F1 stands for Fernando. At every race he provides what are starting to look like scripted sound bytes. Once again the McHonda failed, but how did he get away with dumping the car smack in the middle of the pit entrance causing a restart? Now we’re having minute by minute news of his American adventure.

    I suppose this means we’re having a rest from moans about Lewis Hamilton daring to have interests outside of F1.

  14. Indeed during one of the Free Practice sessions there was a helicopter flyover shot at the start of the session which began out at the sea and showed a pod of dolphins (I had to Google the collective noun, but one lives and learns!) frolicking in the water oblivious to the on-track activity just a short distance away.

    1. I saw that one too. The Russian helicopter pilot was certainly, umm, somewhat more active at the controls and flying somewhat lower than would be usual in most countries.

      1. Gosh, yes, i honestly thought he was about to auger in at one point with the amount of pitching he was doing.

      2. I found myself wondering more than once if his downwash could affect the aerodynamics of the cars on the track.

  15. Joe, any opinion on the comments from the Malaysia GP promoter? Me thinks that the number of country backed GP are going to go down even more over the next 5 years.

  16. a bit off track – we rarely see in the media about the Drivers/Racers that were not fortunate enough to get into top teams to show their hand in real at F1. Can/would You like Joe to do some series about the Great Racers who for whatever reason were driving at the back of the Thundering Heard? Maybe next off season? yes, You have done some already

  17. Hi Joe
    Notwithstanding Fernando’s reported move to Renault, have you identified an improvement in the technical team since the takeover? Do you think the team could realistically challenge the main contenders?

  18. Joe, you wrote:

    > part of the deal was for Sauber to buy McLaren gearboxes, which wouldn’t be much use if McLaren was switching to Mercedes.

    While I expect McLaren to stay with Honda next year, I don’t think Sauber using a McLaren ‘box is much of a pointer.

    Frankly, I can’t see Sauber had a choice. They don’t AFAIK have an in-house gearbox development / production capability, and McLaren are the only team to have used the F1 Honda engine. So if McLaren go elsewhere for 2018, Sauber would still have to buy in a McLaren gearbox, it would just have to be a 2017 one (unless Sauber or Honda paid for updates). I suppose in theory Honda could develop their own in-house, but that seems pretty unlikely.

    OTOH, the fact there’s a Sauber deal *at all* does I think dial up the chances of McLaren staying with Honda half a notch; if McLaren weren’t nailed on, I would have imagined that Honda would at least want to consider withdrawal, and would have refused to commit to Sauber without some confidence that that wasn’t going to happen…

  19. I absolutely love the notebook segment, I wish there was more of it! Would also love to hear more stories, sometimes I feel I’m transplanted to those places. Subscribed to GP magazine this year for the first time, it’s great reading material that I carry on my phone all the time!
    I think the Russian GP was success, even though a lot of people think it was boring, I found it really interesting, and how great was Valtteri winning?

    Regarding the US allegations against Putin, I would say allegedly would be the right word to use here, as no court has ever proved it, and the US likes to make assumptions all the time.

    Thank you for all the work, to you and your team.
    All the best!

        1. Yes, I give it some credibility, but having a plan is one thing. Making it happen is another

          1. Why haven’t they bought Manor team instead ? They had all the crew and installlations and a car…

  20. Hi Joe, there have been reports that foreign journalists covering the upcoming Confederations Cup in Russia will be required to sign a document promising that they will only report on the tournament and nothing else. How would you fell if asked to sign something like that?

  21. I’m now picturing the staioners of Paris sucking their teeth and saying “Green, guvnor? Nah, sorry. No demand for green notebooks, innit!” accompanied by championship-level Gallic shruggery.

  22. I wasn’t surprised Lewis had an off weekend, a couple of weeks ago he was tweeting about much his missed Nicole at 3 in the morning, and I remember Ron and Martin saying, his performance on track pretty much correlated with how well he’s getting on with Nicole.

    Very emotion driven driver, obviously everyone’s personal life effects there work to varying degrees, but when he’s happy, he’s devastating, when he’s not, he goes awol.

    Not sure how this one will resolve itself as she has moved on, and he’s clearly unhappy, might be an off year for Lewis unless he finds a way to deal with it or be happy.

  23. Judging from the comments Chase Carey made today, LM are becoming annoyed by the constant steam of nonsense coming from Ecclestone. Can we expect all out war in the near future?

    1. What Jean Todt has described as a ‘honeymoon’ with Liberty is in fact a cold war with the F1 establishment that may get hot at some point. Just IMHO.

    2. > Can we expect all out war in the near future?

      Wouldn’t all out war require BCE to have some actual, you know, leverage?

      Anyway, why would he want an all out war, when he can continue his current programme of sabotage, sowing discontent and whatever other maskirovka-style techniques he’s picked up from his mate Dobby the House Elf?

      Joking aside, I’m actually baffled by his behaviour, (though not, I must admit, for the first time, which probably just proves that he’s alot smarter than I am). Unless he has some actual plan to monetize his disruption (demanding an above-market rate buyout to agree to go away and shut up???), I can’t see what he achieves apart from making himself look cheap.

Leave a reply to RodgerJ Cancel reply