One tiny little point…

The newspapers this morning are filled with stories of how Bernie Ecclestone is going to give Bahrain more time to make a decision about its Formula 1 race. This is all well and good (or not, if you do not think much of the Bahrain government), but it overlooks one rather important fact: it is not for Ecclestone to decide whether the race happens or not. The last time I looked at the rules and regulations, it was still the FIA that makes such decisions and, the federation tends (these days) to look at a rather bigger picture than might once have been the case. Money is not everything and while that is Ecclestone’s thing, the geopolitical aspects of such a decision belong to one J Todt.

There was a time when everyone thought of Todt as being Max Mosley’s successor (read puppet), but in the course of the last 18 months, it has become clear that the Frenchman is not only his own man, but also has his own agenda, and the sport is just a part of it. There is much being done in the worlds of mobility, sustainability and road safety, which is highlighted by a new campaign called Action for Road Safety, which will run alongside the United Nations’ Decade of Action for Road Safety. The Decade of Action will be launched on May 11 with a 24 hour “rolling” event which will begin in the East and will travel West in the course of the day, as governments, international agencies, civil society organizations and private companies mark the official launch of the project. Rumour has it that McLaren will be showing up in Downing Street in support of the campaigns.

The FIA has kept a low profile in the sport since Max Mosley departed, with little controversy and some very successful innovations, notably the driver stewards. The question of Bahrain is an interesting one because the sport must decide if it wants to be associated with a regime that has done itself terrible damage by violently suppressing what began as very moderate protest. One can understand that the Bahrainis were worried about the effects of giving in to requests for more democracy. Such a thing is inevitable when power is held by a few privileged people, while the majority have no say in what happens.

The ruling class may have felt that they were doing what was best for the country, but the way in which the problem was dealt with, has seriously affected the way the world views Bahrain. That may have been a misjudgment and the Bahrainis may wish to turn the clock back and revive their previous status, but that is impossible. What is done is done.

Students of history will point out that the development of modern democracy has been going on for nearly 900 years, dating back to the Magna Carta in 1215, which first limited the authority of the King of England. From then on the lesson of history is that repression is never successful, but always aggravates the problem. One can dominate a population for decades, but in the end the urge for self-expression will always return and it is the enlightened who help the process towards an organised society, rather than trying to maintain a concentration of political power in the hands of a few.

Today is an interesting day in this respect for in Britain there is much celebration with the Royal Wedding. The royals have none of the power that once they did, but they have the affection and respect of their nation. Other nations, who did away with royalty, may not understand the British way, but it is a model of how things can be done.

34 thoughts on “One tiny little point…

  1. Its impossible not to wonder if F1 should be in a country run in the way Bahrain is, but the reality is its too late for that question.

    Nothing that happened there is out of character for their rulers. Its not even surprising.

    As F1 stands today there are likely too many sponsors & team owners/shareholders from the Middle East for any of the larger teams to publicly come out in favour of abandoning Bahrain.

    Bernie will not want to lose what has to be one of the highest paying races on the calendar.

    Would anyone bet against Bernie in a fight, regardless of who appears to hold the cards? If Bernie had retired and someone else was pulling the strings it’d be a different matter entirely.

  2. F1 Journalist, political reporter, motor racing analyst, financial researcher, history commentator…

    Tell me Joe, can you also play the harmonica!?

  3. Another nice one Joe.

    Just a few days ago I read a nice piece about the first democratic constitutions and thoughts about the democracy in France in the 19th century. Part of it was, that a constitutional Monarch with no real powers would be the best safeguard to some of democracy’s pitfalls for populism.

    Looking at the British Royals, as well as the Netherlands, Denmark and Norway (a few examples), I think this really works fine having a head of state looked up to (and scoffed at times as well) to throw a party at times and have politicians watch their mouth at least for someone.

    For a short while I was very hopefull a similar move could happen in Bahrain after their Crown Prince vowed to go talking, but events after that clearly showed there were more people too afraid to let that happen.

  4. “The lesson of history” is that repression usually works for the elites in the short run, democratization does not work for the elites in either the short or long run. The Bahraini royal family probably do not care if there is another uprising in 20 years time, provided they keep power for the short term. In an elite centric game, where elites do not want to lose power, democratization goes against their interests, repression can often help sustain their control. Look at how Bahrain government has stayed in power when it repressed, compared to Egypt/Tunisia where it didn’t.

    Todt has been surprisingly effective, and is taking the sport in a new (and in my mind better) direction. This is clearly getting to Bernie.

  5. ^^ Not that I support the fact that they repress people, I think it is awful, it just explains why they did it, and why they were logical to do so.

  6. @D Why would F1 need to bother? There are a few other Gulf Nations with cash to burn, access to the same investors, businesses and tourists as Bahrain. We’re forgetting how unsentimental the sport can be. If it can bypass circuit Gilles Villeneuve and Spa-Francorchamps I don’t think Bahrain stands a chance given how other localities will fill the void instantaneously.

  7. The majority of the British public have a great affection for the British Royal Family. Unfortunately one of our antipodean, octogenerian, tabloid owning cousins doesn’t.
    He is perhaps at the root cause of some of the ills of this nation. Why doesn’t he pick on the Saudi Royal Family?

  8. Who decided not to host the race there this year? The Bahraini government. Yes, it was force majeure. Decision-making authority is not as simple as you state. This morning’s statement from the FIA names the FIA, FOM and state of Bahrain as the joint decision makes in this case. Happy with that?

    1. Kaka

      If you do not want to believe me, then that is fine. Maybe it is politic for the FIA to say that.
      Who owns the World Championship?
      Who formalizes the calendar?
      End of story.

  9. How can someone be stupid enough to believe that Jean TODT might be somone else’s puppet ? Has anything in his history proved so ?

    As for Bahrain, you didn’t mention that TODT has stong allies in the middle east and they are quite powerful in the FIA. The question is are those allies Bahrainis and mainly are they pro-Baharaini government.

  10. Barnard,

    In Tunisia/Egypt the military didn’t repress against president’s wishes. In Bahrain, the military did repress because it’s made of non Bahrainis and mainly because many of the units come from Saudi Arabia which nightmare would be to have Shiia seizing power.

    The Saudi Arabia stance is the reason why Western Democracies are shocked by Libya and Syria and not by Bahrain

  11. Joe,

    I understand your viewpoint, but in the Islamic world, “democracy” is only the name of a highway that leads to fundamentalism.

  12. Now normally I would immediately blame Tony Blair, however in this instance it has to be the French.

    There is always a reluctance to give up power by those that have it. In this case along with the power, goes immense riches. There was maybe a point where the act of ruling could have been gently transferred to an elected parliament, whilst the money stayed royal. But beyond that there is the “Revolution, off with their heads syndrome” where the only options are to cling to power using all force necessary, or risk annihilation by the mob.
    There are reasons why democracy will never work in the middle east, they are tribal and religious and take no heed of boundary lines drawn on maps only a few hundred years ago or less. One only has to consider Iraq to see that the whole place is normally a seething mass of inter- sect, and inter-tribe warfare who come together only under dictatorship (royal or religious) or to repel a common enemy or invader. (currently us)

  13. To quote Speed tv who in turn are quoting what someone else said:

    “As far as we are concerned a decision is still due on Sunday,” said a spokesman for F1’s governing body.

    “Because it’s a weekend it may be Monday morning that we announce the decision, but we haven’t spoken to Mr. Ecclestone about any delay,” he added.

    Especially as Ecclestone indicated on Thursday that there have been discussions with Jean Todt, the comments are an indication the 80-year-old remains at loggerheads with the FIA president.

    The FIA spokesman concluded: “The decision will be a joint one between the FIA, Formula One Management (Ecclestone) and the Bahrain authorities.”

  14. I Must say that in business it matters who your bed fellows are and in this case the public image of F1 and Bahrain are not even close to comparable. Skip this year if theybever want to have a race again I would say

    On a side note, Joe your web page when viewed on an iPad is a thing of beauty. Well done.

  15. Hi Joe !
    “Other nations, who did away with royalty, may not understand the British way, but it is a model of how things can be done.”
    A model ? Yes, THE model ? no indeed. We make it much more simple in France chopping a few heads to let these guys know who was the boss… In my ideal democracy (and I have a lot of respect for the UK as a democracy) nobody should have a role given solely by his birth… This cannot be democratic. The belief that one family has some special rights only because it is so is beyond my understanding… way beyond !!!

  16. In my view the politics or the morality of the situation had little if anything to do with the cancellation. The primary reason was that the protesters threatened to target the GP itself so driver and spectator safety could not be guaranteed.

    I also think there is a double standard applying here. A lot of people are saying Bernie and/or the FIA should be taking a moral stance on this and refusing to race while the government continues to suppress reform. I don’t see the same people saying the same thing about China yet any hint of democratic reform there is suppressed very quickly and sometimes quite brutally.

    And really, if you are going to start basing your decision as to where to hold races on some moral standard, where do you draw the line? Do we withdraw the Turkish GP because of their often brutal suppression of the Kurds. What about Malaysia with its government enforced racism, or Singapore with its supposed “democracy”.

    The reality is that F1 is a large international business tied up in complex long term contracts and also responsible for the employment of thousands of people around the world. The decision to cancel a race cannot be taken lightly.

    As with any large international business, the decision as to whether to operate in a particular country is based on profitability and risk analysis, not the morality of the government.

  17. Well, a little late on this reply. But something was bothering me about the attack on Bernie for trying to buy more time. Looking beyond the logic, humanity and politics, I can understand the effort being made to try and save the Bahrain event.

    Just look at the monstrous investment Ferrari has made in Bahrain. Have you ever seen anything like Ferrari World anywhere else? I would guess that it is just the tip of the iceberg. A great many companies have made extremely large investments in Bahrain – based solely on the long term contract – a safe one given that without a democratic government having to deal with constituent complaints about the cost of the event (usually the reason for cancellations) it would likely have continued for some time.

    With all those investments, many by those underpinning F1, it is easy to understand the effort Bernie would make to protect those who invest in the long term in the sport. It is a natural and very protective move by one who a) doesn’t need the money; b) tends to think long term; and c) time and again stands alone against those who won’t be around to deal with the consequences of their short-sighted manipulations in F1.

    1. David B

      This is not about Bernie. It is about human rights. And Ferrari World is in Abu Dhabi not Bahrain.

  18. They Royals? Please, as an Italian we detest any sort of Royalty, this is what lead to the Roman Empire. No one is “higher” than another. SPQR!!!

    1. OK. We all have our different way. Italians have a way of running their country and electing curious characters that others might not agree with.

  19. Joe
    “In France you become a politician if you go to the right school. Is that any better?”

    No but their “justice” system seems interesting if “Spiral” is anything to go by. Just as “Zen” (sadly not re-commissioned after the first three excellent episodes) produced an intriguing look at the Italian system.

    Anyway GP Saboteurs has just arrived in the post so I’ll shut up now.

  20. Sorry about that. I tend to mix up my dictatorships. I’m going to study my geography and history a little more before making comments. I guess I just wanted to make a point about Bernie’s dedication to the sport rather than pouncing on every statement by or about him as seems to be the fashion these past 20 years.

  21. In spite of “democracy”, civilization flourishes wherever there is more respect for life, freedom and property than intervention. See ‘Democracy: The God That Failed’, by Hans-Hermann Hoppe; ‘The Ethics of Liberty’, by Murray N. Rothbard; ‘Notes on Democracy’, by H. L. Mencken.

    2011 – 1215 = 796, but 2011 – 1188 = 823, therefore the Carta Magna Leonesa by Alfonso IX, King of León, remains Spain’s genuine founding document and the world’s oldest known constitution: See http://books.google.es/books?id=qzw0AAAAIAAJ from p. 395 to p. 437, and particularly between p. 410 and p. 418.

    See also Althingi x 300+ years; Brehon Law x 1,000+ years for even older real Law, unlike today’s legislated whims.

    The early bankster induced fiction that eventually emerged as ‘state’ cannot be ethically justified. In every field of man’s action including F1 only a natural order of private property under private law is ethically justified for it requires no “ruler” whatsoever as individuals are free to associate or not to associate, and criminals (those who do not observe the non-aggression axiom) are simply expelled from civilization, beggining with the financial terrorists of course. The sooner the better.

  22. Joe,

    What do you suppose happens to race drivers who have homes in Bahrain? I don’t think I would want to visit any time soon.

  23. If there is a McLaren in Downing Street i`ll be down there with me camera in my hand…. I work there 🙂

Leave a comment