Coughlan goes back to NASCAR

Williams’s recently departed Technical Director Mike Coughlan has a new job in NASCAR, as technical director of Richard Childress Racing. He will work alongside Mark McArdle, who is the director of race operations and will report to Dr Eric Warren, who is the team’s director of competition.

Coughlan has been involved in racing since he left university in 1981. He worked initially with Tiga Race Cars before joining the Lotus F1 team in 1984. Six years later he became one of John Barnard’s design team that designed cars for Benetton in 1991 and then after a secret project for Toyota, was involved with Ferrari until 1997. The operation later became known as B3 Technologies and began working with Arrows in 1998 and Coughlan stayed on with the Leafield team after the deal with Barnard broke down and remained at Arrows until it closed down in 2002. He then moved to McLaren. In 2007 he left McLaren amid accusations of espionage. He left the sport and designed military vehicles, notably the Ocelot armoured car, and then went to work for Michael Waltrip Racing in NASCAR, an experience he enjoyed greatly. However, when he was offered the job to head the Williams technical team in 2011 he jumped at the chance and led the design team of the FW34 that gave the team its first victory for years at the Spanish GP last year. This year’s car was not a success and Coughlan departed the team in July.

24 thoughts on “Coughlan goes back to NASCAR

  1. Considering the amount of prize money Lotus is sure to lose without Kimi helping to fight for 2nd or 3rd in the Constructors, wouldn’t it have made sense for Lotus to pay his salary to keep harmony in the team?

    Compared to what an F1 team spends, his salary seems relatively meager.

      1. what is the current financial situation of the team Joe? I mean.. Kimi gave team a healthy amount of points in 2012, and 2013 as well….

        where is all the money going? In Lopez bank account? Sorry for going off topic…

        On Coughlan: it´s sad that he leaves Williams… the 2012 car was good, and his earlier work at Arrows had Adrian Newey taking note.

          1. What about race by race prize money? Do the teams get that as they go along or in a lump at season’s end? Do drivers get race prize money direct or could a team sit on it?

    1. What if Ferrari paid extra at his seat fitting to ensure that he suddenly has the surgery long before he sits in a Ferrari?

  2. Thanks Joe!
    It’s true, I have no idea. This to me is a real sign of F1 being in trouble. Seems like a huge mistake as Lotus has been on the rise, and both team and driver are so popular!
    Can you tell us the difference in prize money from 2nd to 4th?

    1. The difference is a lot of money! But it depends on a number if variables that one cannot guess, so one cannot say a figure with certainty.

    2. Looking at recent form (last 5 races), it’s looking unlikely that Lotus can overtake Ferrari for 3rd, let alone chase down Mercedes for 2nd. It’s possible but they’re almost needing double podiums in back to back races.

      “Selling” Raikkonen’s seat might make Lotus a chunk of cash if anyone is sniffing around to pay for a seat – or they can attempt to broker a deal to put Kimi’s replacement (Hulk?) in the car early and help the other team fill the seat with a pay driver.

      On top of saving Raikkonen’s salary, scoring fewer championship points also means paying a smaller entry fee for next season, although the difference is relatively small. Still, if Lotus are interested in avoiding scoring points, I’m available in the weekends to come…

  3. BUT IS ROMAN NOT PROVING TO BE MORE THAN ABLE NUMBER 1, AND IN THE LAST FEW RACES HAS HE NOT OUT QUALIFIED,OUT RACED KIMI.

  4. I have to admit my ignorance re NASCAR, I believe its what the Americans call stock car racing. Having read the little that the old stig wrote about driving in NASCAR it is certainly very different from any of our european formulae both open and closed wheel series.
    NASCAR seems to be based on “ordinary” road car models though I suspect it is silhouette only. Is should suit Mike after the military vehicle interlude.
    Our version of stock car is seems nearest to what the US calls Outlaw series racing, though I am unsure if it is a full contact sport like UK stocks.

    Well we can only hope that circumstances allow Mike to write his version of the events that led to he $100,000,000 fine.

    1. rpaco, re your last paragraph, think it would go something like this.

      Chapter 1: Don’t ask your wife to photocopy Ferrari documents at the local photocopy shop.

      Chapter 2: Mea Culpa – my bad

      The End

  5. I’d not noticed Coughlan had gone. Does this mean there’s still a Technical Director’s role going at Williams? Which could be filled by, say, a soon-to-be former Mercedes employee? Or am I adding 2 and 2 and making 7?

    1. Martin

      Pat Simmonds joined Williams about the time, or just after,Mike Coughlan resigned but I’m not sure of Pat’s job title.

      Could Brawn and Simmonds work together?

      Perhaps Simmonds concentrates on technical stuff and Brawn becomes Team Principal (principle? never been sure how to differentiate those two)

      Martin Collyer

    2. The role required is team manager, but would Clair step aside? How is she looked upon in the team? It is a pity that she is Frank’s daughter since that immediately raises the thought that that is why she is there.
      Has Ross lost his magic? He made some bad decisions during races this year, something he never would have done at Brawn or Ferrari.

  6. Any chance that RCR’s car next year will look like a Williams with fenders? Sorry, Joe, some people never forgive or forget, depending on the issue.

      1. And if we ever do learn the true story, it will be interesting to see which turns out to be the bigger scandal: the offence, or the penalty.

  7. If anyone has seen the design of an Force Protection Ocelot vehicle one would say Coughlan would be going stir crazy in the overly restricted world of NASCAR – it is not a place for good engineers.

Leave a comment