Green Notebook from Cogoleto

Looking out of the window I can see the Ligurean Sea and the beach at Cogoleto. Away in the distance is the eastern part of the port of Genoa and, if it wasn’t cloudy, I could probably see the Portofino peninsula beyond that. I stopped here on the way to Monaco because the hotel promised a sea view and, just for a change, I have not been disappointed.

Cogoleto is interesting enough, but lacks good restaurants on a Tuesday night. There was a battle of sorts in 1800 when the French were trying to break the Austrian siege of Genoa. This failed, but sneaky old Napoleon won the war by beating the Austrians at Marengo, further to the north, which I will touch upon again a little later.

There is an ongoing battle in Cogoleto over whether or not this was where Christopher Columbus was born. There is a house in the centre of town, where there are various inscriptions saying that Columbus was born there, but it seems that there are other claimants. Given that Columbus was born in 1451, the records are not great, so the modern battle for tourist dollars is not easy to settle. Genoa also claims him, but it could be that the confusion comes because Cogoleto was part of the Republic of Genoa at the time. To be honest, I’m not bothered either way but the locals seem keen to keep fighting over him.

I’ve travelled 1,100 miles since I left home and it has been great to be back on the road after a couple of months in airports. The unruly hedgerows of northern France and the trundling tractors, splattering the roads with mud, are signs that the winter is over and the glories of summer are ahead. This year Paris will host the Olympic Games and I shall be avoiding it, because the roads are already clogged. It took several hours to get around the ring road, let alone go into the city. By the late afternoon, however, as I was climbing up through the Jura, heading towards Geneva, the odometer in my old trusty Toyota Prius registered 470,000 km. This is roughly 12 times around the world or, if the car could fly, we would now be on our way back to Earth after visiting the Moon.

In celebration of another 10,000kms under her belt, the car decided that it was time to renounce the quiet life and have a mid-life crisis and transformed her exhaust note into a rorty torty V8 rumble. The man in the ticket booth at the Mont Blanc tunnel said: “Oh, I thought you were a Ferrari” as I pulled up.

“Nope,” I replied (in French). “Just an old Prius with something wrong with the exhaust.”

“Sounds great,” he said.

It did, and heading down (literally) into Italy in the early evening, it was amusing to see heads turning, expecting to see a Ferrari but instead getting a rather antiquated but very reliable Toyota. This kept me amused as I roared across the paddy fields of the Po, where one is surrounded by water. Around the city of Vercelli the Italian rice industry produces 700,000 tonnes of rice a year. This makes a lot of risotto.

This part of the world is all about food and even the Battle of Marengo, which took place near Alessandria in 1800, is now best remembered for a chicken dish named after it by Napoleon’s chef. After one reaches Piacenza one turns to the south-east, down the autostrada running parallel to the Roman Via Emilia, with the coastal plains to the left and the foothills of the Appenines on the right. This is the land of Parmigiano, Parma ham, Lambrusco wine and dark gloopy balsamic vinegar from Modena. There is the colossal monument to food just outside Parma, in the form of the Barilla pasta factory, which churns out 450,000 tons of pasta a year, which makes the Barilla family very rich, although Paolo Barilla, once an F1 driver and winner of the Le Mans 24 Hours, knows how to  be inconspicuous and can pass through crowds unnoticed while flashier folk, who are poor by comparison, jingle with bling and dress to be noticed.

Before one gets to Imola one passes through the so-called Motor Valley, where supercars are born. This is one of the reasons that Imola holds an F1 race, to promote the automotive engineering cluster of Emilia Romagna.

The race name is slightly longer than the silly Welsh town of Llanfair­pwllgwyngyll­gogery­chwyrn­drobwll­llan­tysilio­gogo­goch, being officially known as the “Formula 1 MSC Cruises Gran Premio del Made in Italy e dell’Emilia Romagna 2024”. This is held at the Autodromo Internazionale Enzo e Dino Ferrari, which is positively short by comparison.

I cannot imagine any commentator saying all of this, even if they could manage it without tripping over their own tongue.

So we all get around the problem by calling it “Imola” and then moving swiftly on to chatter about the bad old days 30 years ago. One should remember these things, of course, but I find the whole “On This Day” movement to be a bit of publicity bandwagon, onto which lots of people wish to jump. Those who were present at Imola in 1994 (and there are not many left in F1 these days) are less keen on dressing up in Senna yellow and parading about for the TV cameras, as many of those who were not there are currently doing.

It was a busy weekend at the autodromo, in part because the local police force created a strategic traffic plan which involved closing as many roads as possible, in order to drive visitors bonkers as they tried to navigate in or out of the city. Each morning we watched people coming in looking frazzled from the traffic even before the work had begun.

Stefano Domenicali is a native of Imola, and the city is obviously delighted with the work he has done getting them an F1 race. He was duly granted the keys to the city by the mayor Marco Panieri (the one in the tricolor sash) but Stefano has yet to have a street named after him. I know this because we visited every thoroughfare in the town trying to get out one evening, after unwisely deciding to eat in the charming medieval downtown area.

What was clear is that the Roman Empire was not built by policemen from Emilia Romagna.

Stefano and his troops are busy building the Formula 1 empire at the moment and the latest excitement in this respect is the delivery to the teams of the first draft of a new Concorde Agreement, to get the sport from 2026 to 2030. For those who do not know, the Concorde Agreement is a commercial agreement between the various parties that governs the sport. It was created more than 40 years ago and continues to work pretty well, although it needs updating from time to time.

Much of the new deal is not contentious, but there are things that need to be sorted out. It is all secret, by the way, so knowing what is in it is not easy. The prize money structure is likely to be changed to give the smaller teams a better share and the extra money that Ferrari receives will remain, but it will be capped and no longer a percentage of the revenues. There is also a new  system for new entries, which will require applicants to fulfil certain requirements (as yet unknown, but likely to include racing and winning in Formula 2 and Formula 3) and a bigger anti-dilution fee that applicants will have to pay to get access to the prize money. There may also be a first year without any prize money to make sure that any new teams are serious. The FIA’s involvement in this is minimal as it has the separate Concorde Implementation Agreement, which runs until 2030, covering governance and associated fees, which are index-linked.

Politics was a bit of a talking point as there were Prime Ministers aplenty with Thailand’s Srettha Thavisin and Bahrain’s Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa both on the grid. Thavisin wants  a race and Al Khalifa is the man who decides what happens at McLaren and was present following Lando Norris’s victory in Miami.

The Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni was going to attend but was busy and so sent along her deputy Matteo Salvini. They were joined actor Hugh Grant, who I seem to recall once played the role of being a Prime Minister in a rom-com, although it was so good that I have forgotten the name of the film.

The grid was a Presidential-free zone as Donald Trump was busy in court and Mohammed Ben Sulayem was busy scheming how to get re-elected as FIA President in 2025.

There was an odd statement from the FIA declaring that the Formula 1 group and the federation are going to make peace and live happily ever after. This caused a few wizened eyebrows to creak upwards. There has been a state of friction since Ben Sulayem was elected in December 2021 and so this was a bit of a surprise. This was clearly something that he and his sidekicks wanted in the public domain and the Formula 1 group did not object. However they did not issue the same statement, only acknowledging it and making the vaguest of conciliatory noises. This indicated to me that Liberty Media does not want to waste energy on conflict with the FIA, which serves no useful purpose, but whether they want to help the current FIA President be re-elected is quite a different matter.

There were political moves of a different kind at Audi with Oliver Hoffmann now beginning to make changes to get the F1 project as he thinks it should be. Hoffmann is the General Representative of Audi F1 and is responsible for managing Sauber, the power unit division at Audi Formula Racing GmbH in Germany, and managing the relationship between the team and its parent company Audi AG. Politics within the Volkswagen Group, of which Audi is a part, sometimes makes the Borgias look like a parochial church council. It is hard to follow who is trying to murder who and even Hercule Poirot and Jane Marple might struggle to see the fingerprints on some of the knives. This is not a great way to go racing and those with long memories may recall the Ford Motor Company getting its knickers into a similar kind of twist over Jaguar Racing 20 years ago. What the project needs is F1 people who know what they are doing, rather than corporate pole climbers. We will have to see how it all turns out but the dynamics of the entire project have changed since it was announced in August 2022. Originally the project was led by Markus Duesmann, a former BMW F1 engineer, who was then Audi CEO. To cut a long story short, he put in place a group of ex-BMW people to run the project. He lost out to Oliver Blume in the fight to become CEO of VW Group. As a result he was duly taken out by a well-aimed corporate bullet in the summer of 2023, when Gernot Döllner was made the boss of Audi. Hoffmann, who was chief development officer of Audi under Duesmann, was then hit by a flying axe but survived and staggered into the F1 role. He has now decided that his long-time assistant (I have heard him described as “a hit man”) Julius Seebach, who was at one point the head of Audi Sport, should now become chief operating officer at Sauber. Manufacturers have a habit of breezing into F1 thinking it is all very easy and they almost always end up with egg on their smug faces. Alpine’s bosses are currently trying to wipe off the remnants of their recent omelette-interface, while GM is busy scrambling its eggs in preparation for a disaster it will not see coming.

This sort of thing does confuse the driver market because the boys in F1, who are generally not good at cooking, are trying to figure out where best to go to avoid executives who think they know what they are doing, but usually don’t.

Carlos Sainz was the talk of the town at Imola with lots of surreptitious meetings regarding his future. What emerged is that he is unlikely to get a drive with either Mercedes or Red Bull, but Audi is willing to pay him a LOT of money. Apparently the number is actually a little shocking, but Carlos is not someone who needs more cash and he would prefer to have the best available seat. Audi (I am not sure who exactly) has set some targets that seem pretty unrealistic of being at the front of the midfield by the end of 2025. Given the state of the team at the moment, this is about as likely as Hugh Grant becoming a Prime Minister, although there have been some new hires at Hinwil, including the American engineer Steven Petrik, who has been at Ferrari (with Sainz) and Lee Stevenson, Max Verstappen’s chief mechanic at Red Bull in an effort to get the team up to speed.

On the engineering front there is rumoured to be a big change at Brackley where the Mercedes team’s continues to struggle. This has led to the departure of Gioacchino “Jack” Vino, who has been the chief aerodynamicist of the team since 2022 and has been with the team since 2018. Vino is an Australian but with a name like that will probably end up a Ferrari, which likes picking up ex-Mercedes people.

Haas is busy trying to build a better future and the whisper is that since Nico Hulkenberg signed for Audi, the team has been looking to have Esteban Ocon replace him. The other seat is going to go to Ferrari protégé Oliver Bearman, although the news has yet to be announced. Ocon is also on the list of drivers that Audi is interested in, but the state of the Swiss team and the time it will take to be fixed, plus uncertainty about the Audi engine in 2026, makes Haas a better option.  The suggestion is that if Sainz and Ocon do not join Audi the available seat there will go to Pierre Gasly.

Alpine says that it is happy with its current drivers (which cannot be said vice versa). Team boss Bruno Famin says (quite rightly) that the priority is to get the car more competitive and then drivers can be sorted out.  If the current drivers depart, the team will probably look at Guanyu Zhou (a former Renault Academy driver), who knows the team and is a big bonus in marketing terms being Chinese. Mick Schumacher is racing for Alpine in WEC and is also a possibility, as is the team’s reserve Jack Doohan, who was out testing an old Alpine at Zandvoort in the week before Imola. If the team wants someone with race-winning experience and a funny hairdo, it might choose Valtteri Bottas.

Elsewhere, the chances of there being an Indian Grand Prix have again receded after Moto GP ran into trouble with the promoter and with the Indian authorities. F1 left India because of tax demands from the country’s bureaucrats and will not return until these rules are changed. The planned circuit on Gujarat is rumoured to have been axed as a result. This is a shame as India is potentially a fantastic market for F1, although progress can be made through TV and social media even if the red tape is impenetrable.

This brings me back to traffic. On Monday morning, after a long night of work, I had to stop to rush a colleague to the airport in Bologna. The experience was such that when a few hours later I set off to drive towards Monaco, I took the decision to go south, up the valley of the Santerno, rather than trying to get through Bologna on the autostrada. For once there was a bit of free time and I had a vague plan to go across the hills, by way of the Futa Pass – once a big deal on the Mille Miglia road races from Brescia to Rome and back, and then down through the Mugello valley towards Florence where I could pick up the motorway up the west coast of Italy to Genoa. What I didn’t realise was that the damage done in these parts by last year’s flooding was such that it is still being fixed and the roads are a mess, with constant temporary traffic lights where repairs are required. There was evidence of some impressive landslides along the way.

I was tired and had not eaten anything that morning and so after less than an hour on the road I stopped to have lunch. The food was wonderful, including a mysterious dessert called Zuppa Inglese, which translates as “English Soup”. I don’t quite know how to describe it but it was wonderful…

The waiter explained that this was an invention of Caterina Sforza, the Lady of Imola, who had encountered an English trifle somewhere along the way and asked her chefs to create something similar. It is far, far, better…

Naturally other regions also claim this dish as their own. One can easily start an argument (if not a war) by claiming that pizza was invented in Naples.

I decided after that that I would stay overnight and spent the whole afternoon asleep, too tired to go any further. That evening I discovered that the village had a amazing cobbled humpback bridge, dating from 1500, which so they say inspired Leonardo de Vinci to design a bridge for Istanbul (which was never built).

There was also an old fortress which today houses various museums about the heavy fighting which took place in the area in 1944 as the Allies battled to breach the Gothic Line. There was also a  museum devoted to the chestnut.

I drove up through the Futa Pass in cloud and rain, pondering whether to drop into Pisa, or La Spezia, or even Portofino, but I just kept going. One thing that was amusing was that Imola provided a first for me. I had never before been asked for a selfie on the grid… It made me wonder: could I now call myself “an influencer”? I guess if I was commercially-minded I would have found a sponsor for this column and you’d be reading The Green Notebook, brought to you by Maalox, or such a thing. I guess that if I thought that way I might also be driving a loaned Ferrari rather than a Ferrari-sounding Prius. Mind you, this column is as much about the romance of travel as it is about motor racing, so a Prius is a better travelling companion than a flashy Ferrari. One of the great travel writers Robert Louis Stevenson might never have been successful if he had called his book “Travels with a Racehorse in the Cévennes”, as this might not have sold as well as his adventures with Modestine, a belligerent ass.

I’m laughing as I write, because that last line could give me a great segue into quite a few people in the world of motorsport and I’m having to “bite my tongue” not to take advantage of the moment…

Anyway, I concluded that having a Ferrari loaner would be a disaster as someone would nick it if I took it to some of the places I travel. And I’d probably get a lot of speeding tickets.

Still, a smart influencer would be driving around in a free Ferrari, sponsored (virtually) by Imodium, with a Maalox-funded green notebook in their Boy Bag by Chanel.

Not really my world. I’ll stick with Zuppe Inglese and racing cars.

Joe Saward is hosting an Audience for fans in Montreal, if you would like to along and ask questions, click here

94 thoughts on “Green Notebook from Cogoleto

    1. I certainly prefer the Green Notebooks to the F1 races –
      as I don’t bother watching the latter anymore.

      The races themselves aren’t the issue.

      It’s just that TV coverage in the UK is a real turn-off –
      (Director’s camera choices and the annoyingly ‘exuberant’ commentary)

  1. Marengo reminds me of a pub quiz I did many years ago. The question was what were the names of Wellington and Napoleon’s horses at the battle of Waterloo, with the hint that one was a European capital city and the other was both a battle and a chicken recipe. The answers of course were Copenhagen and Marengo. Having just read a history of the battle of Waterloo, I knew the answers but I was surprised how many other folk knew one or both.

  2. I did find Vettel’s arrival a little like an unwanted matriarchal Grandmother showing up and expecting everyone else to dance to their (pretty weird) song.

    The trouble is, if anyone dares criticise it as perhaps a little over the top, you’ll be the one facing the criticism.

    P.s. Hugh Grant was PM in “Love Actually”.

    1. I thought it was just me that was uncomfortable with Vettels perhaps well intentioned but rather more about Vettel appearance at Imola, than commemorating the passing of Senna or even Ratzenberger, or marking their legacies.

      maybe its an age thing, as I well remember that terrible weekend, and watching it unfold, and it just didnt sit right with me how this particularly anniversary was marked.

      perhaps if more of Senna’s & Ratzenbergers contempories had taken part it might have felt less of a this is all about Seb, who as he said in interviews only learnt about Senna through his Dad, experience.

      Equally Im not quite sure McLarens special Monaco livery is really about hitting the right notes either, but this seems to be the way in modern F1.

  3. I always love your green notebook Joe, informative, funny and thought provoking as always.

    thank you

      1. So, the technical department lead of the entity who brusquely dismissed Andretti’s proposal, joins the Andretti F1 project and this is of little significance?

        While it certainly has no guarantee of bearing on Andretti’s entrance to F1, I can’t see how it is anything less than a positive endorsement for the project from an informed individual.

          1. As an F1 ‘outsider’ that’s exactly how I see it.

            ‘Poacher’ turned ‘gamekeeper’ for one final (and one would assume very large) pay cheque!

          2. Entirely possible. But I would imagine less likely given Andretti’s commitment to a wide swath of motorsport.

            Nonetheless, it is F1 and the FIA’s own existing rules that facilitate this situation. Changing the rules (or at least crying foul at the rules one set themselves) in the middle of the game is hardly defensible. If this was such a concern shouldn’t they have renogotiated or ammended the Concord Agreement long prior to any of this silliness? Furthermore, F1 incorporated (arguably unreasonable and unprecendeted ) sporting justifictions and expectation to substantiate their rejection- treading well into FIA territory. I seem to recall the FIA getting a few warning shots for poking their nose into commercial matters over the past few years.

            Regardless of the name or country of origin of the entrant, it’s the irrational justification of the rejection of an application and project well within the ruleset and the scathing rebuttal that was honestly quite disrespectiful, off-topic and unwarranted.

            Instead of the excitement and hype of two new entrants (and 4 new drivers), here we are. My question is: is the the best outcome for the sport, teams, competitors and fans? Maybe the teams but I have a hard time seeing how this outcome is better for the sport, competitors or fans.

            1. The problem of excitement and hype is that the teams don’t achieve anything and in the old days hung around and then went bust. Having achieved nothing. With the system now existing to pay everyone, that will not happen but there would simply be “second class citizens” who survive but do little. They would be passengers on the sport. People underestimate what is required to have a competitive F1 team. These are massive industrial combines. You need to see how long it takes for someone like Williams to recover despite having money behind them.

              1. All perfectly sound logic, but the Andretti entry in particular seems to be as you have pointed out about getting an asset at a 50% discount, which is wholly different to lacking technical expertise. I also understand that 10 teams is seen as enough, a few extra seats would give more drivers an opportunity in F1 though.

                And yes, for me there is the romance element of Andretti as Mario is one of the greatest all rounders the sport has seen. Sadly other than the name though he will not bring much else to the party. Expanding on what was written in your previous post that Andretti assembles spec cars, you could argue teams in the BTCC know more about what it takes to build a prototype!

              2. I think this might be problem people are worried about Joe. Has the sport become impenetrable? Are the teams too big?

              3. Given your wealth of experience in the world of F1, do you have an opinion on what should be the policy for or against new entrants going forward?

                Should it be a closed shop at 10 teams? New entrants allowed based on some additional scrutiny and metrics?

  4. Imola provided a corker of a slow burn race where everything happens at the end.

    After Miami and now Imola, the state of play seems to be thus:

    The days of Red Bull being 20+ seconds in front by the end of a race may be over.

    Out at the front, McLaren have made significant gains into Red Bulls lead. Ferrari appear to be a bit static but they may move later.

    However, it appears to be that McLaren can only challenge Red Bull when the latter have some kind of issue, that leads to a particular vulnerability. In the last 2 races there appears to be some kind of set-up problem with the car that has manifested itself by Max not being able to turn the car in his usual aggressive way. Then they can catch and even surpass them.

    Therefore, Andrea Stellas assessment that McLaren can catch up within the next 12 months is probably the more accurate. The regulations are now entering the later stages, so it all depends now whether Red Bull can make any more gains, paying particular attention to the law of diminishing returns – or have they squeezed as much juice out of the orange as they possibly can; and/or can McLaren make any further inroads via development.

    Red Bull have gone from being 25 seconds in front ahead at the end of the first race of the season, to being beaten and now apparently hanging on by their fingertips after round 7.

    With this being the longest season ever and 17 races still remaining, it could all get a bit tasty – certainly more tasty that the past 2 seasons have been.

    Would you agree?

    PS loved the Notebbok and laughed out loud at the egg on face imagery, especially with reference to Alpine.

  5. “this column is as much about the romance of travel as it is about motor racing”

    And this is what I love about reading it.

  6. I remember from Imola back in the 70s, I think for an F2 race. I also remember having to explain to Mama Surtees why there were all the daily tolls, when were were supposed to be at work. After work was done we all went down the Autoroute to Rimini for a swim every day.

  7. There are several variations of Zuppa Inglese. I have often enjoyed it in Emilia Romagna. This version is a slice of sponge cake with four quarters, pink and yellow, seeped in strongish alcohol. I have always thought that this is how Italians view the English.

  8. My understanding is that this race has only one year under contract and will disappear from the calendar with Monza as the only race in Italy. Is that the case? Is this a race/event that folks inside paddock will miss? Do you think the idea of a semi-annual rotation for traditional tracks/races will gain any traction?

    1. I agree, although I would argue that Italy always has two races as Monaco is a pretty Italian place…

  9. Ocon going to Haas strikes me as rather unlikely, preferring them over Alpine or Audi in the eventuality Sainz doesn’t go there would be odd. Yes, Alpine has had a very rough start and at one point looked like going off the rails however with the arrival of Sanchez the technical department seems to be on solid footing.

      1. Joe I wonder why Ocon is not Toto’s no.1 or 1.5 choice to replace Hamilton?

        He’s always seemed like a driver who would step up a gear given the right equipment.

        But then one could probably say the same for most of the grid…

          1. So what’s the point of spending mega bucks on F2, or becoming a reserve driver and/or being farmed out to FE or sitting out a year IF an alleged super kid just jump into a coveted seat?

        1. I don’t think it’s that Toto doesn’t rate Ocon (I believe I read somewhere that Merc still ‘manage’ him and his career?) but rather that Toto doesn’t want to lose Antonelli to a rival team in the same way he did Verstappen.

    1. Alpine looked like going off the rails? I’d say they’ve fully come off them. Look at the results from the last race. Both cars lost places – and it’s not as if they qualified high uip either.

      1. Fully off the rails means sustaining that long term as was the case with Williams, that looked like Alpine’s trajectory until luck would have it and Sanchez became available.

          1. I don’t know for a fact, nobody knows for a fact either way, what I know is he’s the best technical lead they’ve had in a long while.

  10. Hi Joe, since this is half a travel blog, where would someone stay in proximity to Monaco if planning to attend the race one day. Someone of modest means I might add.

    1. Ventimiglia, Camporosso, Dolce Aqua. Just across the border. Good and cheap(er) food and drinks.

  11. Joe, their was a detail here you failed to illuminate… Concord agreement for 2026 to 2030. Just four years? Seems ridiculously short for a group who will agonize over making the agreement from now until 2025 to get it agreed. Toss Andretti coming in in 2028, why not go for something longer term? Some stability… What is coming in 2030? Big rule change? I thought previous agreements were 7 ish years? Why so short?

  12. If the answer to any F1 Team Principal’s question is ” let’s hire Bottas for next season ” they surely no nothing about what makes a racing driver. He has never made a move that you can say ” wow” to and never made a car perform better than anyone ever thought possible. Magnusson is much more of a racer but also more of a basher.

    1. But if a team wants a ‘solid’ driver (and who could mentor a rookie if it came to it) – and one who won’t cost them as much in repairs…?

      Additionally, let’s not forget that when he has the machinery he can and has won races; remember BOT 2.0 and 3.0 winning for Merc? Unfortunately, he never seemed able to keep it going over course of a whole season.

  13. There was also a museum devoted to the chestnut.And you didn’t visit? That sounds nuts.

  14. Toyota could be your obvious sponsor. When you hit 500,00km they should hand you the keys for a new Prius. My wife loves your Notebook articles, reminds her of all the travels she dud years ago, same places. I enjoy them also…

    thank you.

    1. The Prius was a quiz competition prize that Joe won from Toyota when they were in F1. As I was reading that it was sounding like a V8, did wonder if someone hadn’t knocked the catalytic converter out of it though. Sounds like in some parts it can be rife, and the way they do it damages the floor pan and makes the car an economical write off insurance wise 😦

        1. It happened to a friend’s mother’s Prius, causing the car to be written off. This was in Saarrff London though, which is “Here be dragons” territory.

  15. It will be exciting in year or two when Newey joins Andretti(since they have uncapped spend until F1 invites them to join the circus and when Red Bull signs Tsunoda and Ricciardo since Merc poach Max and Perez let go(to Audi)

  16. So if Sainz doesn’t go to Mercedes but Antonelli isn’t considered ready to go there who would get that seat Joe? Or does Sainz not going there mean Antonelli is nailed on?

  17. The British PM just called for snap elections, so Grant as PM isn’t out of the realm of possibilities.

    1. He also played wannabe Prime Minister, Jeremy Thorpe in a BBC adapation of that scandal. He actually played the part brilliantly which was good, as before he really was stereotyped for his roles as Dennis Pennis put it, he used to warm up by going into a forest and shouting at the trees.

      One day they will make a docusoap of his other famous incident. I wonder who will play the zipper!!

  18. Hi Joe. Great notebook as always, and good podcast from Miami (although audio was poor quality). When you look at Perez, can’t help but feel in retrospect how good Bottas was in comparison to his stellar teammate Hamilton. Poles, wins and podiums etc. do you see it the same way? Andrew Benson has a stat that Perez has only finished second 4 times vs. Max with all his wins. I also have the feeling the championship might be closer than what we think.

    1. i agree… VB77’s rep has taken a bashing since he joined the Hinwil lot. People (or F1 fans) lack the insight these days. They need to look beyond results and consider equipment, management and strategy when evaluating drivers.

      The alternative view is that he was p an emergency solution to Rosberg’s retirement and was flattered by the Merc’s enormous performance advantage .

      1. I think VB77s stats tailed off at the end of his time at Merc, and he doesnt seem to have that youthful hunger for F1 anymore, it may just be Max is much better than people give him credit for too.

  19. Dear Joe. Thanks for a great read as always. I’ve just checked out the RLS book from my local library. Have you heard of A Bite Sized History of France? I read it for my foody book club. I’m headed to the 24 hours of LeMans next week. Spending a week in Paris with a friend before doing a full 12 days in LeMans. Do you have any advice for attending LeMans? Thx. Terri C Sent from my iPhone

    >

    1. It’s been many years since I did Le Mans but I’m told the tram is a marvellous way to avoid traffic

  20. So Joe are you saying that Ferraris sound like clapped out Priuses (Prii?) :)-

    Selfies, what’s next

  21. very enjoyable read and educational Joe, my days of traveling through by road, being part of the circus, was normally a little rushed with no Idea of the areas I was passing through. Your geographical and historical information is really interesting and makes me want to do it all, allover again at a different pace. Bravo that man

  22. Hi Joe, an enjoyable read as always.

    Do you recall the name of the village with the beautiful bridge. I am curious as my home town of Pontypridd has a bridge over the River Taff that looks similar although ours, built by William Edwards in 1756, has three large holes either side to decrease the weight pushing upwars into the narrow centre section. It has become the symbol of our town.

  23. Joe, thank you for your wonderful notebook. But what is the name of that village with the beautiful bridge and tasty zuppa inglese ? (I really would love to stay in that place for a while)

  24. One of your best ‘Greens’ ever in my opinion and well said on all the Senna garbage goings on in Imola. Cringeworthy doesn’t come close. Some of them are still at it for Monaco too….

  25. HI Joe,

    Is Esteban really not at all on the Mercedes list not even as 3rd or 4th option? As that seems really strange considering his track record and relations with Mercedes and the fact that he might be the perfect fot in case Kimi isn’t ready.

    The unfortunate is that ot seems that he might never get a top seat in F1

  26. Joe – can you elaborate on this statement further? Thanks kindly in advance!

    (while GM is busy scrambling its eggs in preparation for a disaster it will not see coming.)

    Cheers from Germany! David

    1. They are making all the classic mistakes manufacturers make when they come to F1 because they underestimate the task and think it is easy. I’ve seen it happen so many times and I see it developing there… It has happened at Alpine and make also happen at Audi.

      1. So true Joe and based on how they came in and got Andreas Seidl in early etc, I thought Audi was going to buck that trend but it seems to be heading in that direction as others further up the tree jostle for control.

  27. Always a great read thanks Joe.

    “Summer pudding” is the English version soup. Many variations of course, depending upon which fruits are in season.

    I actually managed to watch my first GP this season without knowing the result in advance. However either Channel 4 or Bernie’s mob at Biggin Hill spoil it by putting the subtitles over the top of the leader board. It is little better on high res, but after all these years of complaining I see that nothing has been done. Such a simple thing. Unfortunately they seem to have got an AI involved in the subtitle text , the results are often even more hilarious than before. One would think that a bit of learning of F1 nomenclature would be a good thing before unleashing it on the public.

    I wonder how much a Prius cat costs.

  28. Hi Joe,

    Thanks for the green notebooks.

    Can you tell me if there is any chatter in the paddock about how awful these ground effect cars are? I feel these cars are an embarrassment to the sport and a total waste of everyone’s time.

    This isn’t an anti Max/Red Bull thing. I don’t care who wins as long as the cars are exciting to watch and have the drivers at the limit of their ability. These cars are overweight, lazy and can’t be raced in wet weather because of the extra spray they kick up.

    I’m amazed that alarm bells don’t seem to be going off within the sport.

    Thanks Joe

  29. Joe, thanks again for a wonderful notebook. Any thoughts on the Bottas to Williams rumors? I thought they (or more specifically Mercedes) were gung ho for Antonelli.

  30. Joe, are we ever going to learn the story of what truly happened at Red Bull with Horner et al? At the beginning of the season, we asked to believe Horner was F1’s Jeffrey Epstein, then the controversy totally disappears. No followup on the story. It appears now that it was purely an attempt to manipulate the public since nothing concrete ever came of it.

  31. I was struggling with what to cook for dinner for the family, once I had read this, decision made: Marengo Chicken. Went down well with all. Thanks Joe!

  32. Hi Joe, it was such great fun meeting you on the weekend. I spent a time chatting to Damon Hill too, across two or three conversations; eventually he asked “who are you?”. I was tempted to respond that I’m a Joe Saward fan.

  33. I know the Prius meets your needs and that you’re unlikely to buy a performance car.

    But it might be fun to figure out where your broken exhaust stopped being intact and arrange to have an exhaust cutout installed right there… for that Ferrari sound whenever it amuses you to amuse yourself and others.

    No special part exists for a Prius, nor is one required. It’s just something that a knowledgeable mechanic would weld together, incorporating an electric switch under the dash. A decent mechanic who knows his stuff and who’s not interested in hosing you could do it economically.

    There might be better ways to add fun to an old Prius, but I can’t think of one right now. 😉

Leave a comment