A new twist for the Formula One group

Financial rumours are always to be treated with care because one never knows why the news is being leaked and who gains the most from such leaks. Quite often such stories are not at all what they seem to be. The word, however, is that US media billionaire John Malone, who is in the middle of a major expansion into European markets, is looking to buy control of Delta Topco, the parent company of the Formula One group, in order to be in a position to decide which TV channels would be buying the media rights to F1 racing, so as to either boost the revenues of other companies in his empire, or to charge his rivals more for the same privilege.

In recent months Malone has bought British cable company Virgin Media, which added 25 million customers in 12 European countries, plus the Dutch cable company Ziggo, Belgium’s Telenet, Germany’s Unitymedia and, in the last couple of days, Eurosport, of which he now controls 51 percent with a put option to acquire the remaining 49 percent. A put option gives the owner (Eurosport in this case) the right, but not the obligation, to sell the shares at a specified price on a specified date.

The goal of all of these moves is to create growth for his companies by acquiring new programming and new channels.

The word is that he wants to acquire the Formula One shares currently controlled by CVC Capital Partners, which wants to cash out in F1 because its plans for a stock market flotation have been blocked by the legal troubles surrounding F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone.

It is entirely possible that such stories may have been leaked to try to inflate the value of the Formula One group for another buyer as the rumoured $9 billion price tag seems rather high in the circumstances. CVC bought control of the Formula One group for a fraction of that and has taken a great deal of money out of the sport, in terms of dividends and loans.

There is clearly an opportunity coming up for a change as another Formula One shareholder called LBI Group Inc, an entity which exists only to sell off the remaining assets of the defunct Lehmann Brothers, in order to generate as much money as possible for creditors, has said that it will sell its 12.3 percent share by the end of June, or hand over the equivalent money. If CVC Capital Partners adds its own 35.5 percent to the deal that will be close to the figure needed to buy a majority of the ordinary shares. There are other investors who would probably cash in as well (and may have to do so with tag-along, drag-along rights). CVC is believed to have some kind of veto over the sale of the LBI Group Inc shares, which means that it would buy the stock and then sell a bigger stake to a buyer.

However, this does not necessarily mean that a buyer would actually control the Formula One empire because this appears to influenced by a parallel company called Delta Prefco, which has some of the same shareholders as Delta Topco. These investors get a different (and preferential) deal to those involved in Topco. It is understood that rather than getting a dividend based on annual profits, Prefco shareholders get pre-determined sums. In exchange for this benefit, the Prefco shareholders seem to have agreed to allow Bernie Ecclestone to have the right to veto all Delta Prefco decisions if he chooses to do so, so the acquisition of the Topco shares would not necessarily give a buyer control of the empire and purchasing the golden share from Ecclestone would, no doubt, be wildly expensive, unless there was a way in which it could be annulled. Much of this is information is covered by confidentiality agreements so it is hard to know exactly what is going on.

The last sale of shares in Delta Topco was in October 2012 and this valued the business at $6.6 billion. That deal was for three percent, which had been held by LBI Group Inc, which was acquired by the Teachers Retirement System of Texas (TRS) for $200 million. The Formula One group had previously been valued at $7.6 billion after CVC offloaded 21 percent of the business in May 2012 for $1.6 billion.

It is hard to imagine that Malone would want to buy the company just as a financial investment, as the private equity and pension fund people do. He is more interested in exploiting the media rights to the sport in a different way.

61 thoughts on “A new twist for the Formula One group

  1. Interesting undulations on the sea, and it’s clear the rats are abandoning the soon-to-be-wrecked Ecclestone vessel. I wonder how this transactions will ultimately translate for the viewer. Eurosport has a vastly experienced staff, and an hugely attractive infrastructure, and I’d personally jump with joy to watch F1 there. In any case, it almost certainly can’t be worse than Sky..

    1. Worse then sky? The sky race coverage is fantastic, far ahead of the bbc and the presenters are getting better now they have built up a bit of chemistry. Yes it’s true that the are not as good as Jake, Eddie and DC were but they are as good as the team with Suzy Perry.

      The analysis Sky do is far better with the skypad and Croft and Brundle are probably the best pairing since Murray Walker retired and so much nicer to listen to then shrieky Ben Edwards and David “Red Bull” Coulthard.

      1. Ted’s notebook is the only worthwhile addition Sky brought into the coverage. The skypad looks flashy, but Gary Anderson can explain far more with a rough drawing and a felt tip than Ant D with all his tech and pathetic camera pans. Other than Suzy Perry, the BBC team does a great job, and on a tiny shoestring too, which makes a massive difference. Sky’s coverage is the equivalent of a football fan’s idea of how F1 should be watched, which is frankly moronic.

      2. YOu guys should have had to suffer through Star Sport’s Low Def broadcast… I couldn’t even read the drivers’ names on my big screen. thankfully now they piggyback Sky’s broadcast of the race.

    2. The sky coverage of the races is, at times. poor. But stuff like Ted’s notebook is so much better than anything we have ever had on British TV previously i struggle to understand the constant put downs Sky get online…

      1. I totally agree, if people look objectively at the coverage they would say that it is excellent. I think its purely the fact that its on Sky and people have to pay for something that until now had always been free. I already had Sky Sports so it didn’t really make any difference to me but I appreciate it is a lot of money for many people especially if F1 is the only sport they like to watch where as in my family its good value as I like the football and cricket, my wife likes to watch the golf and my sons both like watching wrestling so Sky Sports definitely gets a lot of use.

        Put it this way if the exact same coverage were on ITV or Channel 4 then I honestly believe that most people would be saying what a brilliant job they are doing rather then constantly complaining almost 3 years on.

    3. You could be so lucky like us in the USA who get the joke that is NBC to air it. The feeds from everywhere in the UK are worlds better than NBC.

  2. This gets more and more convoluted every time I hear about it. I wonder what percentage of the F1 fees go to the legions of lawyers that are no doubt retained to oversee it all. Mind boggling. Thanks for the insight Joe

    1. I do not know the percentages, but combined recurring legal expenses (both in-house and outside counsel) for the core functions of the business are regularly mid to high 7 figures ($). “Exceptional events,” in the parlance of the legal industry, can and have pushed the sum to 8-digit territory. Much of this work is actually discounted due to the nature of the client and the huge amount of ancillary legal business (i.e. other clients) the principals generate (and the go-to firms capture because of their niche domain experience).

      Bernie’s personal legal fees, which are no doubt substantial, are another matter altogether.

  3. So Malone’s interest would be served by increasing tv viewing numbers in the US & Europe. Sounds okay. What’s the skinny on his investment in media via the internet?

  4. And this is why you’re by far and away the best F1 journalist out there, Joe.

    Understanding the F1 cobweb. Another book you should write some day.

  5. Joe has strongly and repeatedly stated that the business model of FOM doesn’t depend on fans, but rather depends on income from such things as pay per view TV, sanctioning fees for races, and etc. This is most probably true. But this generation of short term profits at the expense of the long term viability of the ‘sport’ is not sustainable. It seems they are killing the goose that lays the golden egg. Interesting and troubling times.

    1. No that was me not Joe. He may agree or not, or partly.

      Two years ago I predicted a collapse of F1 within 6 years if things did not change. (By “things” I mean the financial structure, existing commercial agreement controls and administration methodology)

      We are now in a somewhat pregnant situation where great change could happen or be thwarted by several factors or people.

    1. Just what I was thinking. What a tangled business web Bernie has woven. I hope all this background manouvering results in a better deal for the fans. I’d be prepared to pay a small fee, say £5, for race weekend coverage.

      1. NowTV are getting pretty close – £10 for 24 hours of Sky sports, including the F1.

        It’s mainly targeted at football fans at the moment, but I can see them experimenting with £10 for just the F1 channel for the 3 days of a race weekend – I’d pay it sometimes.

  6. It will be interesting to see which road block is brought into play as we watch this unfold.
    The FIA theoretically has a veto over any new owner (sorry I mean lessee) of the commercial rights. (Which are still owned by the FIA.)
    However they may be eager to tear up Bernie’s 100 year deal and negotiate a new one. (whether that would be good for us or the teams is another matter. )

    Luca Montezemolo claims he and/or Ferrari also has/have a veto over a new commercial rights holder.

    Bernie will claim that he has control via Delta Prefco shares and can say who is allowed to buy them, thus directly control the selection of a new holder. It may turn out that Delta Prefco controls only the dividend distribution and has no other purpose. ie does not own Delta Topco in any way.
    CVC may have a clause which nullifies Bernie’s control via Delta Prefco should he be convicted.

    Isn’t this all so very “Bernie”!

  7. 1. How would the FIA and the teams react to even more pay per view?

    2. What will the reaction of ” team Murdoch” be?

  8. Here’s a good idea, at least to my mind. Wouldn’t it be great if the whole shooting match of CVC-Delta Co- BCEcclestone just disappeared up it’s own exhaust system ( turbo or not ) and F1 crumbled to dust. Then maybe we could have GP2 as the F1 replacement while a new series with a decent mix of mainly European circuits was established, with participant entrants from those of F1 that wanted to stay, the likes of Ferrari, Mac,Williams, and new entrants from GP2 and F3. Now, maybe we could have new races in places like Zandvoort, Brands Hatch, San Marino etc, without bothering with China, Russia and other Tilkedoms….to really put the cherry on the cake, maybe we could have cars with a variety of V8-V10-V12-F12-H16 engines in n/a 3-4000cc format, manual gearboxes, and restrictive aero rules….and maybe, just maybe, the spectators could meet the drivers, have access to the Paddocks, and be close enough to the trackside not to need binoculars to see what is happening…..oh, and maybe this could happen for a spectator entrance fee of say £25-30 for adults and kids go free!! As an election platform base, I reckon an awful lot of fans would vote for this!

    1. I watch F1 on TV (when possible!) but for about 90% of the other things you mention – different engines, gearboxes, access to paddock, drivers, etc. cheap(er) tickets, etc. you should try the ‘classic’ or ‘vintage’ race meetings. I regularly see very exciting racing, overtaking, unpredictable and varied vehicles at ‘club’ level events at many of the circuits you mention plus some others which are not on the F1 calendar …

  9. Seeing that Liberty Global already owns UPC, it will give John Malone’s company around 98% of all the cable tv customers in the Netherlands when the Ziggo deal comes to fruition…a pretty big stake in a maybe small but F1 loving country…

  10. All this money flying around and i don’t have any of it 😦

    all i used to want is to watch fast men in sexy cars RACING each other. not had much of that recently which is why all the off track goings on i hear about here is way more interesting than than the on track goings on i dont get to see due to PPV

  11. That’s very interesting Joe. A tangential thought perhaps, but in the forthcoming case of FRG vs Ecclestone, B, the prosecution case is that the accused bribed Grib to ensure that FOM was sold to CVC because the accused was worried that he might lose his position in F1 if anyone else bought the company. If however the constitution of Delta Prefco gives Ecclestone, B a power of veto over all decisions, one is bound to wonder why would he have had any such concern?

    It has always struck me as fairly implausible that BE feared that other prospective buyers might want to get rid of him. Why would anyone do that? But if he also had a golden share, the premise for the bribery argument seems all the more unlikely.

      1. But does the present structure have any more credibility then the wheeze Ecclestone tried to pull on the banks in the early 2000’s.

        Didn’t the banks collective shareholding account for 75% of F1 against a Bambino holding of 25% but who exercised total control over F1…. wasn’t that laughed out of court in late 2004?

        And wasn’t Gribkowsky BE’s nemesis even then?

  12. On what media/channel does eurosport broadcast? Would this be the end of free to air Bbc coverage in the UK? The mention of virgin worries me as I cannot got cable where I live, would this render it impossible at any cost to watch f1?

    Bring back the days when f1 was about engineering excellence which people could watch rather than this entertainment that happens to involve fast cars. It may not make as much money, but it would mean no much more.

  13. You can’t get Eurosport in the for free in the UK. It is available with a sky/virgin sub. You can subscribe directly with them for around £4 a month, and view it on your PC/Tablet and some smart tv’s.

  14. thank you for this quite thrilling exposé of the wonderful world of Formula One as we get ready for the launch of the 2014 version.

  15. Joe,

    A bit of an irony in all this proposed takeover – mergers in the F1 arena. John Malone took over Virgin Media which was a cable – telecom company here in the UK. Before it became Virgin Media, there was a number of smaller companies, one of which was NTL / Telewest a cable / telecom (big in London) company which John Gregg was the CFO , and the main architect of their debt mountain, before moving on to becoming there CEO, shortly after it went bust, owning billions. He disappeared off to America, hopefully never to be heard of again.

    Of course he has now returned as the main person behind Bluewater Communications Holding, which claimed to have out bid for F1, and had alleged backing from two Funds for $500M each, but surprisingly no mention of who was writing the open cheque for the additional $100M plus to seal this so called deal. Even the New York Court hasn’t seen a copy of the open cheque letter.
    Of course he is now attempting to sue all the companies that John Malone is looking to acquire. One final bit of news on this strange case, it is him, not the two funds who would have gained the most if they were successful, who are actually filling the claim against Bernie and his companies. All it appears he lost was some form of finder’s fee in putting the original deal together.

    The problem we see with John Malone is the mountain of debt he is acquiring on this latest European adventure. But if one looks at the F1 business, and think back to how Joe has described it, been a room full of filling cabinets, and 300 staff, then this is the mega cash cow of all time. You will be very hard pressed to find another business with the turnover and profits that F1 has, produced with this number of people.

    Therefore if John Malone is able to get his hands on F1, keep Bernie in the seat for a few more years. All that cash it produces, you can reduce your debt mountain pretty damn fast, plus have content, which as a cable / TV guy like Malone, will be able to package it in such a way to gain even more for his business, which maybe why Banks are actually talking to him about financing this type of deal.
    But are we back into the Leo Kirch territory again, which started this whole sorry legal drama?

    One very strange thing to think about, if John Gregg hadn’t screwed up the NTL / Telewest business, and Virgin did the merger, as they have done, and then John Malone rode into town and acquired this business, and is now after the F1 business, we might have John Gregg running his F1 business, and not suing everyone in sight. But this is F1 and stranger things have happen…..

  16. What is interesting Joe is that this story came via a completely non-F1 connected journalist. Instead, it came from someone close to Malone (who I happen to know personally, and trust implicitly). Therefore, I don’t think this is someone on the F1, CVC, Bernie side playing a game for once, but actually Malone trying to flush out others.

  17. Joe,
    I’m a long time follower and also a very happy owner of your books.

    I’ve also noted the long standing critical but reasonable comments (on a reasoned basis) from you about a certain other site and their frequent, petty and vitriolic responses (I just noticed a recent one today about your story above). I do not know the genesis of this though: is there some personal falling out long ago?
    Even if you decide not to publish this comment, I’d still be interested.

    Whatever the answer, keep up the great work, and don’t let anything they write get you down. Plus, if you get the time, it would be great to see more books from you.

    1. I have pondered this myself. It is not personal from my side. He has built himself a little niche and he pedals hard to keep it. Good for him. However I do not have any respect for him as a journalist and I am the only one who pricks the balloon of his very substantial ego and tells the world that he is not quite what he seems. I think he is jealous because he wants to have the credibility that comes from 30 years of contacts and experience which he cannot have because he is not really in the business beyond his one very obvious source, who is playing him perfectly….

      1. Lets be honest Joe, you give as good as you get.

        If there’s not a personal history, then why not just ignore him? Why attack back? It’s not like either of you is winning this petty game.

        You get him, but just as often, he gets you. And as we saw today, sometimes with a good deal of success.

        His latest broadside is provably accurate. I looked up the Jersey records myself after reading the article. You were completely wrong. It happens to the best of us. But the best of us own up to our mistakes, and you often do, but not when it’s him proving you wrong.

        That’s why it appears so personal, whether it is or not. Because when he gets your goat, as he did today, you don’t take the high road and admit it.

      2. I read the article today, too. Wow. It seems the sole purpose is to sully your reputation. Must have been a slow day…
        Maybe if the writer had pit lane credentials and got out every now and then, they’d be a little less cranky, no?

  18. Joe,

    Sony has announced today that they are selling their PC / Laptop business VAIO, and looking to spin off the Bravia TV business. They made a loss of £665M, and with their corp. Bonds at Junk Status, I doubt very much they will be a title sponsor or any type of sponsor in F1 in the short time, maybe after 18 months or so, they could be back, if they get their finances back into shape. It would be nice to see them on a McLaren, but that won’t happen, this year.

    Adding to the John Malone story is Vodafone. They are cash rich right now, and looking at a “Convergence” strategy, of mobile, broadband, home phone and TV.
    There has been talk of taking over TalkTalk, and doing a JV with SKY, here in the UK. They are in pay-TV in Portugal and New Zealand, and finishing off a deal for the German paid TV – broadband company Kabel Deutschland. They are strong in India and South Africa right now, and they are talking about owning TV rights – content.

    Of course Vodafone is in a very unique position, as former title sponsors of a front running F1 team, they know all about F1, and what it can bring to their brand. They stopped to re-position the brand, away from pure mobile telecom, but it won’t surprise a lot of people if they also had a nice long look at F1, as they will need content for their new platforms, and they do know all about F1 and of course a lot of other sports. They even looked at bidding for the Premier league football rights here in the UK; but backed away, after BT & BSkyB went at it, and pushed the figures into a new orbit.
    This is not pure speculation, but is now appearing in the financial and business press here in the UK. The articles are written by people who actually cover these companies, not from the F1 world.

Leave a comment