F1 drivers and the fans

I know that fans can be passionate about the F1 stars, but I find it decidedly odd that there is so much bile around. Lewis Hamilton is this, Nico Rosberg is that, and so on… How do the fans know? They reach their conclusions based on what they read, see or hear. But do these inputs give a fair impression?

Let’s begin by making it clear that all the stars in F1 have a huge number of demands on their time. Teams, sponsors, media, friends and family, everybody wants time. As such, they cannot do everything that people want them to do, and how this selection process is dealt with by them and their handlers is the root of most problems. Most drivers have designated time slots to deal with the media and don’t go beyond this. It is rare to find them just hanging out.  Some drivers use social networks to engage direct with fans, but these interactions tend not to be handled by the drivers themselves, but rather by social media people hired for that purpose. The messages tend to be bland and uncontroversial. They don’t give a fair impression of the people.

On my flight home from Abu Dhabi, I was so tired that I didn’t sleep and having watched almost all the movies available (even the foreign language ones) I ended up watching a film called “Be Somebody”, which is a movie built around a teen celebrity who is famous for being famous. It is a Cinderella type of story about a teen pop star (called Jordan Jaye) who accidentally gets left behind by his tour bus in a small town in America and meets Emily, a normal girl-next-door type, who is unimpressed by his stardom, unlike every other teenaged girl in the film. It is an innocuous film, clearly not designed for fiftysomething men, but there were one or two insights into celebrity living, where your image is created by the people around you and you don’t really have a say. One scene which did amuse me was when Jordan does an Internet quiz “How well do you know Jordan Jaye?” and fails to get any right answers. His visit to small-town teenage life gives him new inspiration and energy while Emily learns how to take risks and to be more adventurous. And there’s a happy ending, of course.

Back on planet earth, F1 stars do not have time to deal with everyone and thus noses are knocked out of joint and stars can be perceived as being graceless. The greatest people person I have seen in action was Australian legend Peter Brock, who always made sure that if he signed an autograph or had a conversation with a fan, he looked them in the eye and shone his charismatic spotlight on them, even if it was just for a second or two. I see drivers sign autographs without looking at the people asking for them and I don’t get it. 

When it comes to the media, drivers have different ways of dealing with them. Vettel, for example, does very little media work because he doesn’t want to do it and a lot of folk are frustrated by this because they feel he doesn’t give much back to the sport and doesn’t engage as much as perhaps he should. He’s a funny guy and it is a shame he doesn’t let the world see this more, but he sees it all as being intrusive.

I feel a little of the same distance with Nico although he gives a little more away. Kimi Raikkonen hides behind being monosyllabic, which is clever because the less you are attractive to the media, the less they ask. Others such as Jenson Button are good with the media, but still remain a little aloof when it comes to really engaging with people. You cannot condemn any of them for needing their own space. Lewis puts himself out there and, as a result, is a bigger star than his colleagues. It’s a braver route. Lewis has accepted that he cannot be everything to everybody and so often keeps his own counsel in press conferences, which people then take to be him sulking. He cannot win.

Some drivers choose to have different personas in front of the cameras. When all is said and done, what the fans get is not the reality. This is not to say that they are two-faced but rather that they are protecting themselves.

As a journalist working in this world one gets the chance to see the drivers close up, but obviously they are guarded, more so when they recognise that there are foxes in the chicken coop. Not all journalists play fair, some are two-faced, some get too close to the mark. It’s a difficult and complex world. This is why I prefer to deal with people individually, rather than in groups because that way you know who is dealing with whom and you can have a trusting relationship. The problem, of course, is that one-to-one contact is very difficult to achieve because of time constraints and thus very few journalists can have such relationships and doing that with every driver is simply impossible, so you have to choose who you want to get to know. This is a reflection of the popularity of the sport and why it was easier in the old days when, firstly, there were fewer journalists; and, secondly, they played to different rules and reported in a different way. The old style still exists for many in the business but the access is difficult.

The advent of PR people means that they tend to prioritise journalists based on their reader/viewer numbers and thus TV always gets the first bite of the cherry, although in this age of pay-TV PRs often forget that some TV stations have again fallen behind newspapers and social media in terms of numbers. Sky in the UK for example gets far more access than its numbers deserve because it is perceived as being the only game in town, whereas several newspapers have more readers than Sky has viewers. Channel 4 should get way more access and Brazil’s Globo should be seen as the most important of all.

And then there is the question of influence, which is a better measure than readership. The man from The Times, for example, rightly or wrongly, gets more access than the man from the Hindustan Times, which makes no sense in readership terms, but happens because of the brand value of The Times. Being an F1 PR is anything but easy because one is constantly spinning plates and the top of sticks, hoping none will fall off. And doing it with yapping terriers at your feet, tearing at your trouser legs.

Suffice to say, drivers need their personal space and the media is often seen as pressure they can live without, but in many ways, when compared to other series, such as NASCAR, the F1 drivers don’t do that much.

I find most of  the F1 drivers to be fairly sensible people. They are what they are, youngsters who have grown up in the racing world. They are not always sophisticated nor well educated. Some are, some aren’t. They are not all up to speed with the world. Some of them live in bubbles. Some don’t care.  One must get used to them being friendly on some occasions and then blanking you on others. Sometimes they are just focussed on something else. 

There are no answers in this discussion. People form their opinions based on what they see and what they read and very often these things are slanted. I feel that fans arguing about drivers’ characters is a waste of energy. The abusive fanboy comments one sees on the Internet, do not help. If drivers read these things – and some do – they quickly reach the conclusion that there is no point in getting involved because they have nothing to gain from interaction with opinionated people who don’t have any real idea about the subject. The media, in general, tries to be the link between the two, but a lot of “F1 media” has never been in F1 paddock and some who have have been bad apples, who have served only to make the drivers more cautious.

84 thoughts on “F1 drivers and the fans

  1. As I have yet to make it to an Audience with Joe, all I know of you is what I read. I’m not dumb enough to think you give everything away about yourself and for all I know you may not be that reasonable or bright. But all I ever hear from you, Joe, is good sense.
    I’ve been appalled at some of the stuff I’ve heard and read in recent days, most of which has made me mad not because of what has been said, but more that they’ve wasted part of my life reading it.
    That’s part of the reason I return here and read GP+. I like rational, sensible stories that are actually based on facts.
    May you remain on the road for another 500 GPs.
    Thanks for the great coverage over a very interesting season.

  2. I feel this article can be used as a template on human psychology thesis. Have never agreed more. Thanks Joe! P/S: Since Malaysia GP is only two editions more, I hope you can conduct your fan sessions here in KL. Coming from a long time Malaysian fan!

    Also, I personally think the media has brewed the drama between Nico and Lewis like Clinton and Trump. It’s ridiculuous!

  3. Joe, I remember you writing before about your involvement on a ‘how to do F1’ course for up and coming drivers (possibly run by the MSA?) where your role was to teach them about dealing with ‘the media’ – are you still involved in that?

  4. Joe it is my opinion that Sky’s exclusive F1 deal for F1 from 2019 will be a disaster for the UK interest in the sport . I think it could even lead to ‘death’ of the British GP such will be the decline in interest in f1 from 2019 onward as F1 and it drivers will be even less accessible behind a fully exclusive paywall . What do you think on that Joe?

      1. Agree with you Joe, I always like to make the comparison to my other favourite sport the NFL, which I hope Liberty will follow. It’s part premium pay tv with ESPN and NFL Network and partly public network. That seems to hold up well. And for the real fans there’s the NFL premium pass season ticket, which allows you to stream all games live and has lots of content from NFL Films. I personally would pay for the F1 network on Sky if I didn’t have to take all the other sports such as golf, darts etc.

      2. But to adapt your own words:

        The world has changed and broadcasting of F1 is a very different thing. You can wish that it will go back to being what it was before, but it is not going to happen. Therefore it is best to get on and live with the world as it, rather than as you think it should be.

        So, regardless of what you believe, Stephen’s assertion that the Sky paywall could spell the death of the British GP and the decline of public interest in the competition is a very realistic (probable?) possibility.

  5. I met Lewis at Brands Hatch when he was there supporting his brother in the Renault Clio Cup. My son was in a wheelchair at the time (thankfully now recovered) and Lewis walked over, introduced himself, asked my son how he was, then went back to his brother. No minders, no fanfare, and faultlessly polite. The whole encounter took not much more than 30 seconds, but made my son’s day. What particularly made it special was that he did it solely because he wanted to – there were no cameras there, no sponsors to placate – he just thought he might be able to cheer up a young lad who was having a rotten time.

  6. After every F1 session in Singapore, F1 fans wait outside the Paddock Entrance for drivers, team principals, celebrities, journalists (Mr Saward), photographers and gather around them for selfies and autographs. It is as close as one can get to see the real person behind the helmet and emotions in them. Friday nights are usually relaxed while Saturdays and Sundays depend on the outcome of the Qualifiers and Race.

    One of the better experiences this year was when Sebastian Vettel, upon seeing the crowd approaching and going around him for photos & sigs, asked everyone to queue. He happily attended to each one’s request in a very orderly fashion. First time ever I have seen this happen since the start of Singapore GP. Cheers to Seb!

    Kimi, as usual, sped away in a golf cart. No surprises there! 🙂

  7. Great post Joe👍
    Every driver has a different way he presents himself over the course of the season. So news journalists and fans don’t get it as the truth is rather mundane to the hyperbole that the likes of The Sun and Sky and Italian Sky German Sky come out with. Sadly they are owned by one news group. ..Murdoch. His organisation does come out with a lot 🐂.
    Will miss your insight over the holiday period.
    But it’s true some media outlets just keep choking the “F1 neck” even when it’s obvious that there are no more factual news left to ring out.

  8. I’ve always thought one of F1’s biggest failures is to not promote the drivers more as individuals.

    I’ve mentioned this a couple of times before but I still think that FOM should sort out some half hour specials in an MTV Cribs style format on each of the drivers.

    Where do they live, what are their hobbies, what cars/bikes do they have in their collections, things that people can connect with. I say this should be an FOM responsibility as that way the same footage could be used for the global audience rather than individual 5 minute segments by each content provider. OK a lot of countries would have to have it subtitled but i still think there’s value there.

    It doesn’t have to be super intrusive and probably a lot less work for the drivers than segments for each channel. Plus it puts the drivers somewhere they are comfortable, away from the race track, away from pressures, probably off season would be best, but it would give people new insight into the individuals under the helmets.

  9. G’day Joe,
    Would appreciate your view.
    I’ve been lucky enough to have had some access to some F1 drivers since the era of the ‘Aust GP’ at Calder (non F1, I did media liason). I thought the drivers were treated rather well. However a couple of the international hacks thought they were rather ‘special’ (not incl you).

    In Adelaide in ’85 I saw another view, I was shocked how a few of the international media (sadly, incl an Aussie) treated the drivers. They seemed to think they had a god given right to barge in and interrupt conversations to get their much more important questions answered. I realised why Mr Lauda appeared aloof.

    Access got more difficult over the years and by the turn of the century access was very rare as the PR people guarded the drivers with great zeal, probably as a result of drivers earlier experiences. But, I can’t blame the drivers but rather the media themselves.

    Thanks in anticipation,
    build

  10. It is no different to the days before social media where the many people said and thought the same things but did not have a global platform on which to say these things. Now they are all linked up in a collective consciousness of bile that produced more unfiltered bile. That and the current generation just passing middle age seem to have the greatest level of entitlement of any generation. They think that everything they grew up with was the best and feel entirely entitled to spew bile at anything that comes afterwards or anything different.

    1. I’d agree about social media, I reckon discussion was more sensible back in the day when, if one was upset over an issue, then it was out with the typewriter, and write to The Ed at Motoring News or Autosport…..for one thing people would THINK before they wrote, and for another thing, very few ( almost zero ) idiots could be bothered….or owned a typewriter! Therefore the discussions that went on were limited by column inches, brief and sensible!

      Quite why you assume that the just past middle age generation might display the ” greatest level of entitlement of any generation ” is not clear to me, nor why you should think that they “spew bile” about matters they might be interested in?

      I don’t know about on this blog, but I do know that there are many supposedly ” motorsport ” forums on the internet, and I think you would find that if you analysis the comments made on them on F1 ( they rarely seem to know that there are other forms of motorsport ), then you will notice a very large number have only been watching F1 since circa 1995/96. And the largest number who comment, rarely mention F1 prior to 2005/06. Given the other comments that get made, it is reasonable to assume that this latter viewing clique, have been watching since they were mid teens, and invariably, the views they put forth seem very intolerant of certain drivers. LH gets a big share of the bad comment, and whilst i’m not one to raise the race card and wave it around, I do feel that there are some unpleasant ” fans ” who’s issues with his driving, and mannerisms, are more down to his background than anything else. I’d think you’d find this is less the case with the older, and dedicated motorsport enthusiast, if it even figured at all! This factor rather undermines your comment.

      A friend of mine recently commented how his preferred sport, Football, is sliding back to the past of the 1970’s/80’s when racist abuse was a big issue, and he also commented that social media wasn’t helping in the slightest!!

      Frankly, I dismiss many comments on F1 drivers, as really pathetic and unnecessary as well as vicious and ugly, and the writers display a total lack of knowledge about the sport, its history, the teams, the drivers and the whole ethos of motorsport. They live their “fanboy” lives wrapped in The Premiership and F1 and just about nothing else. Incidentally, although not a football fan myself, these so called fans don’t seem to have any knowledge about football either, outside of the Premiership.

      This is actually a big problem with F1 too, as it has moved away from the grassroots of the sport over several decades, beginning in the late 1980’s / early 1990’s. This divide has broken the connection for young people who used to rise from, like me, viewing at their local Autocross or motorbike Scramble events, to Club, National and International events.
      In the modern era, kids are basically plopped straight into F1, with no background, and no history further back than Michael Schumacher, and he’s starting to dim with time, so that the viewer ends up watching the start of the GP, maybe 15/20 mins on Sky, and then a bit of whatever Premiership game is on or highlights of such, and then the last laps of the GP.

      How to reverse that situation is not down to reverse grids, shortened races, grid by lottery or any other daft notion. What F1 and the FIA needs to do is invest in the grassroots, so as to generate a new generation of enthusiastic Motorsport Fans……not just people who may add a PayWall F1 to their Sky package and then drop it because they are not Fans, but just Casual Viewers!

        1. Hamilton has done more to promote F1 than any other person or firm in at least the last 25 years. A lot of drivers like going the the US because they can wonder around the country unnoticed, not Hamilton.

          1. Red Bull, particularly when they first entered the sport and published the Red Bulletin newsletter, and Lotus/Caterham under Tony Fernandez did a fair amount to give greater access from the teams’ perspective. Fernandez was a regular twitter poster and even got the fans’ input on the naming rights issue over the whole Team Lotus debacle.

      1. I couldn’t agree more. The reason Nascar still does well is because they are always promoting “go to your local track and watch the up-coming stars”

  11. For USian baseball fans, one touchstone is the bus scene in the movie “Bull Durham” where veteran catcher (Kevin Costner) schools kid pitcher (Tim Robbins) in the cliches he must memorize for use when speaking to those in the media. When Robbins complains that they’re all boring, Costner says, “Of course they’re boring. That’s the whole point.”

    People may think it’s funny but it’s also true. Nearly every time a ballplayer tells the media what he really thinks about anything, it causes a ruckus, as half the fans decide the ballplayer is rude, selfish, uppity or otherwise disappointing, as supposedly evidenced by whatever he said.

    Fans may say they want their sports stars to be “more real” and reveal what they really think. But most don’t really want that. What they really want to hear is that the mega-rich star is humble, thankful, loyal and modest. Some personable athletes have charm that permits them to get away with being honest, but most are better off if they just stick to their cliches. Whenever they don’t, they get roasted, as too many so-called fans are eager to treat them as objects of derision and scorn.

    If supporting evidence is required, we need only consult the the comments section about Lewis and Nico… and those two didn’t say much. All they did was display sustained skilled precision while competing at the highest level. We can only imagine the bile that would’ve been tossed there way had they actually said anything.

  12. For USian baseball fans, one touchstone is the bus scene in the movie “Bull Durham” where veteran catcher (Kevin Costner) schools kid pitcher (Tim Robbins) in the cliches he must memorize for use when speaking to those in the media. When Robbins complains that they’re all boring, Costner says, “Of course they’re boring. That’s the whole point.”

    People may think it’s funny but it’s also true. Nearly every time a ballplayer tells the media what he really thinks about anything, it causes a ruckus, as half the fans decide the ballplayer is rude, selfish, uppity or otherwise disappointing, as supposedly evidenced by whatever he said.

    Fans may say they want their sports stars to be “more real” and reveal what they really think. But most don’t really want that. What they really want to hear is that the mega-rich star is humble, thankful, loyal and modest. Some personable athletes have charm that permits them to get away with being honest, but most are better off if they just stick to their cliches. Whenever they don’t, they get roasted, as too many so-called fans are eager to treat them as objects of derision and scorn.

    If supporting evidence is required, we need only consult the the comments section about Lewis and Nico… and those two didn’t say much. All they did was display sustained skilled precision while competing at the highest level. We can only imagine the bile that would’ve been tossed their way had they actually said anything.

  13. If the past year has taught us anything, it has to be that the world is full of “opinionated people who don’t have any real idea about the subject”, and social media has given them a new sense of their self-importance.

    I don’t know what the answer is, other than to ignore them and not read them. Educating people who don’t want to be, or don’t know that they need it, is about as futile as pissing into the wind.

    In the race for volume, quality seems to have been completely left behind.

    1. The good thing about social media is that anybody can publish.

      The bad thing about social media is that anybody can publish.

      1. You mean Social Propaganda, which is what this self censored idyllic crap really is. Vain highlights of the public without the benefits of an editor. Every pillock out there seems to be living an ideal life in Nirvana with proud pictures of their new toaster, where’s the other side? challenges, struggle, failure, disappointment, shortcomings etc. the dark side that rounds out real reality – it does not exist in Disneyfied social media land, where we can all be stars in our very own show. Newsflash people, you’re not that interesting – the public does not require gratuitous self promotion for doing ordinary things – how about a dose of humility.

        Somebody invent a humility icon and let’s bombard the living shit out of each other with it until we learn how to use the internet productively, just sayin.

        I don’t know how I get through life without the latest designer kitchen…

  14. Thanks for a bit of genuine insight into the world of drivers; far more valuable than the miles of column inches of ‘he said/she said’ bs you see elsewhere.
    Your description of the film was an interesting one; not least because it is to all intents and purposes the plot of the first Cars movie, recycled for the theme of teen heartthrobs.

  15. Hi Joe,
    On a positive note, no need for a reason, which driver and which F1 figure would you like to have some one to one time with?

  16. No doubt drivers have huge pressure. They are off course we’ll rewarded but this does not mean the public own them. However as a human minimum good manners, a sense of dignity and being a good role model is not too much to expect is it? I suspect the public turns off just as they do with petulant footballers when they behave in their perception as spoiled brats?….

  17. Agree entirely!

    Some of the comments on the BBC ‘Have Your Say’ section after Andrew Benson’s articles are pretty cringeworthy, mostly from folks who like to be controversial and see their name on the screen rather than adding to the discussion.

    Most of the current drivers are fine when you get them away from the F1 pressure cooker, they are human after all and have a lot to contend with on a race weekend, so probably not the best time for interviews.

    I like Lewis Hamilton, he’s as straight as he can be and mostly happy to tell it as it is, the rest I’m not so sure about. Jenson is OK but on the way out now, Max Verstappen is another one that seems to be able to contain his emotions pretty well.

  18. “The are not always sophisticated nor well educated.”

    This isn’t solely true of the drivers Joe, this is true of the people that infest forums and chat rooms as well.

    I digress.

    A few years back the F1 fans erupted when Lewis spoke to F1.com and during the interview made note of the differences between himself and Rosberg’s upbringing – and how this manifested in different forms of competitive hunger.

    A comparison between Stevenage and Monaco was made and obviously, to the cretins of the press this was manna from heaven.

    I have the dubious pleasure of living abut 30 minutes from Stevenage and have never seen travel brochures compare the modern town to the French Riviera, yet locals took offence at words of more than 1 syllable.

    What was perhaps more disconcerting was Stevenage local councillors used the British media to stoke fires and how Lewis should be supportive. Of course the “bottom feeders” bought into the charade too.

    They clamoured that Stevenage was exciting, it wasn’t a grey town in the middle of nowhere and yet these blinkered idiots seemingly ignored that only a handful of years before (six to be precise, but the indigenous population had run out of fingers on one hand) when Lewis had won his 1st title, all the British newspapers wrote about this grey, non descript town in Hertfordshire.

    They spoke to the councillors and locals – and nobody cared. Just one mentioned that it was no big deal and no need for a parade, ‘it wasn’t like he’d won X Factor…’

    It’s easy to find fault and forums prove that daily. Yet when somebody called the British media and political system to this very example on a fan for I’m, not one fan boy answered. They had no writer to bully because Lewis was being defended not used as click bait.

    1. It is always great to read the comments on this blog, as statistically they do tend to be coherent and informative (and multi-syllabic). Perhaps as a Monaco retort, Stevenage holiday brochures should promote with a tag line ‘Shady place for sunny people’?

  19. Hi Joe,

    What do you think about the after race report that RB drivers always seem to post after the race and the post season couch session between Max and Daniel?
    Most of it is orchestrated but its a bit more content then you get from other teams also enjoyed the FB live session that DC did at the Abu Dhabi GP.

  20. Yeah, Peter Brock was notorious for his fan-interactions. More often thanm not was he the one to ‘turn off the light’ at the tracks.
    I recently saw Verstappen do his routine/promoted half hour interaction with fans, but took that with grace, took the time for everyone, posing, signing and looking one in the eyes. Very positive, although he couldn’t sign as many cards and left some fans disappointed they didn’t get to the front of the line… But I prefer quality over quantity.
    I tend to find that at the WEC races, former F1 drivers, such as Wurz or Webber have less busy schedules, thus are able to interact more. And they don’t seem to mind as well, but that maybe just appearance.

    1. That’s been my experience. The driver that will always stick with me is Johnny Herbert. I met him while he was still driving for Lotus in F1, at Montreal in 1993, and found him a cracking bore. He simply did not want to be there.

      When I met him again, at Trois-Rivieres in 2003 while he drove in the ALMS, he was the complete opposite: witty, funny, etc. He just seemed happy to take the time to chat to a couple of fans, almost like we were aquaintances.

      i’ve come to the conclusion that F1 does that to people, perhaps because of the time pressures or perhaps because the stakes aren’t as high from a financial point of view.

  21. Some people live their own lives –
    Others live vicariously through the perceived/assumed achievements and failures of others.
    No-brainer as to who has the time or inclination to vituperate online.

  22. Unfortunately F1 is not alone in this matter. The football mentality seems to have infected all sports. I just hope it doesn’t get as bad as MotoGP has in the last 12 months where some a certain 2 riders need personal security. Or even worse the abuse that Rebecca Adlinton got which caused her to retreat from public life altogether. I suppose that’s one downside of the Internet the trolls and conspiracy people have an anonymous voice. On another note one of my work colleagues lives in Stevenage and back in 2008 saw Lewis with his brother in a model shop buying his brother a radio control car and said he had a good chat with him and he was really down to earth, a real friendly guy.

  23. From my experience of attending 3 GP’s (Silverstone 15 & 16 and Monza 16) I note that Lewis spent a great deal of time signing autographs / selfie’s etc with fans, much more than any other driver.

    I’m not particularly a Lewis fan, and in my opinion he sometimes appears in front of the camera as a little fake… but on these occasions he was particularly sincere.

    Granted these were his home GPs…

  24. The relationship between the athletes and the fans is very different in F1 than in any other sport, in my opinion. When you go to watch a football match (or a basketball, volley, hockey etc) you get to see your favourite player during almost 2 years, and even if you don’t get an autograph, a word, a photo, you know that only by seeing the person live made your day. When you go to the circuit for a Formula 1 weekend, you get to watch 5 sessions (FP1, FP2, FP3, Qualifying and Race) during 3 days, but rarely you get to see the face of the driver you really like, because they obviously need to wear helmets, but is frustrating not having a chance to see them. The only chance you have is during the driver’s parade, which goes meters away your eyes and for only a couple of seconds. I don’t want to be friends with any driver, but a few people know how passionate a Formula 1 fan can be. I really understand their time is scarce, they live under pressure and they risk their lives every two weeks, but there should be at least a quick session dedicated to the fans on e.g. Thursday after the press conference, with the 6 drivers fans most want to see (choice made by online voting).

    By the way, this is very very odd:
    ****
    I see drivers sign autographs without looking at the people asking for them and I don’t get it.
    ****

  25. Unfortunately this troll and flamer stuff has all been done before. Almost as soon as moveable type came along and made printing (relatively) cheap, a new breed of ‘pamphleteers’ appeared producing leaflets full of their dumb, ill-informed and scandalous opinions complete with vicious attacks on the celebrities of the day e.g. politicians, famous people, ‘foreigners’, immigrants, etc., etc. Just like todays trolls the vast majority were printed anonymously or using a nom-de-plume! Truly, there is NOTHING new under the sun (IMHO)!

  26. Joe, it makes me treasure the conversation I had with Jody Scheckter in 1980 at the last GP at Watkins Glen……. Oh, those were the days.

    1. The great thing about WRC, apart from being able to stand a few feet away from the action, as with motor racing in the 60’s and 70’s, is that the drivers are happy to talk to the fans, when they are either in parc ferme, or broken down or when the event is over. I’ve had conversations with several WRC Champions, and WRC Winners, and they are happy to engage the fans….as Petter Solberg once said to a guy he was chatting to next to me, when the guy thanked him for talking to us, Petter said not at all, you guys pay my wages so why wouldn’t I talk to you?? Wish that was how circuit racing was these days in the top catergories!

  27. The day Lewis stops F1 will be the day I stop watching. There are some similarities with his (and my) hero Senna. He polarises opinion, much like Ayrton used to do. If Nico had controlled the Abu Dhabi GP from the front as Lewis did, everyone from Toto Wolff, Nikki Lauda et al would be hailing it as one of the greatest ever drives in F1 history; a masterful display of tactical driving; the drive of a champion……However, as it’s Lewis, doing something different, indulging in some outside of the box thinking, we’ve all been subjected to a whole pile of tosh insted; utter crap. The story of Lewis and the boy in the wheelchair earlier in this post reveals striking similarities with the way Ayrton used to behave. The random acts of kindness; maybe only a few seconds; out of the gaze of the TV cameras, PR/media and all that nonsense. He did it becasue he wanted to do it, not as an act of self-promotion. What was it that Jo Ramirez said once; he (Ayrton) never refused a child. Lewis appears to be the same. As for his on track activities, if I was lucky enough to have 30 seconds with Lewis, I’d shake his hand and say a huge thanks; thanks Lewis for making F1 exciting; thanks for being different and for doing it right. As the late DSJ used to say, there are ‘racers’ and ‘non-racers’.

    1. ‘As the late DSJ used to say, there are ‘racers’ and ‘non-racers’.

      That’s essentially how I form my opinions of drivers from the junior ranks through to F1.

      I’ve always rooted for a racer than just a professional driver regardless of any character flaws.

      To be fair the truly great ones are always a bit on the edge personality wise!

  28. As one driver said, nobody has a problem with Lewis when he’s in the car, it’s his attitude outside of the car that winds everyone up!

  29. As I speculated in the mammoth 400+ post debate, Vettel confirmed he purposely didn’t attack Rosberg knowing Hamilton was purposely slowing him down. Rosberg is lucky it wasn’t Verstrappen.

      1. Why does Mercedes pay Lewis if he doesn’t always do as they wish? Just like any other driver, Vettel isn’t going to always do what the team principal might want him to do.

      2. BTW, I meant to add that I think Lewis was 100 percent in the right with his tactics. So, I wasn’t implying that just because Vettel didn’t like Hamilton’s tactics, I didn’t. I’m amazed that anyone like Jackie Stewart is criticizing him. It must be the former team owner in him coming out.

        1. Had Nico taken the fight to Lewis and passed him to win the race and the WDC the respect level for Nico would be ten times higher & his WDC would mean a hell of a lot more. He would have silenced his critics, I guess he didn’t want to risk tangling with Hamilton and having a dnf with a possible Hamilton finish. He took the safer, duller option and managed his WDC win instead of grabbing the victory, for that reason he will remain a WDC that won more so on technicality as he has yet to dominate Hamilton and likely never will.

          1. So… you’d respect Nico more if he’d taken needless risks for no good reason… I expect World Champions tend to not do things like that…

            You’re not by chance a Maldonado fan, are you? 😉 😉

            1. It wasn’t the most authoritative way to win was it? just stating the obvious. The fact that he more often then not Nico does not have Hamilton’s pace, let alone the ability to pass him – where Lewis has chased him down and forced him into error to win races says it all. Let’s see Nico dominate Lewis next year – how many people in cyberland expect that to happen? Probably a minority.

              On a personal level I prefer Rosberg’s public persona of Humility vs. Hamilton’s public bling persona. Hamilton is clearly building a Beckhamesque marketing brand and shortly when he graces us with formulating a fragrance, Lewis’ ‘ode to petrol’ will surely make us all P1 with the ladies and in these enlightened times with some of the fellas, so check thoroughly under the tree.

              Champions that out right win vs. winning on aggregate are more compelling, winning is generally equated with finishing first. Would Usain Bolt winning 4 out of 6 races be as compelling?

              1. So… do you also think Alain Prost was a candy-ass unworthy champion?
                Because IIRC he’d go as fast as was required… *exactly* as fast as required and not a bit more…

                1. I think Nico didn’t exactly put his stamp on things by not winning at least one of the last 4 races. Winning on aggregate is not as compelling as winning by decisively coming first in the race – unless you’re an accountant, then perhaps the numbers excite you more. Lewis made a statement by actually winning the last four races and toying with Nico in Abu Dhabi. Nico to his credit did not F things up – which still takes a hell of a lot of skill at that level, fortunately he had no mechanical issues because he was ekeing out a championship not winning it. Lewis even won more races over the season, my point is Nico won by hanging on by the finger nails, is that the mark of a champion? in this case I suppose it is – good thing there weren’t anymore races to come number 2 in!

                  The chant we’re number 2, we’re number 2 doesn’t quite have the same ring to it. It’s not a Lewis vs. Nico argument, it’s a memorable champions dominate argument.

                  On Maldonado, ironically in the sister Merc. he would have done a lot better than you think. Qualify 2nd and not much to hit up front but the wake off Lewis’ car. Pastor could handle that, and with his braces off now he’s ready for the cameras!

  30. Being paid millions, the drivers should be able to tolerate few incorrect conclusions made by fans based on what the see and read. After all, very few of the fans actually ever meet any of the drivers. So seeing on TV and reading is all we have to go by.

  31. I go ‘way back with F1; back to the days of Sir Stirling’s wins at Monte Carlo in a Lotus. We used to get the coverage distilled to about 45 minutes or so one week after the fact here in the US. In that context, I laughed at people lamenting the Mercedes dominance as many have no idea of what McLaren accomplished in ’88.

    However, regarding Lewis Hamilton, I will share two points.

    There are often comments about what Hamilton does outside of racing weekends. His comments about drawing energy and resolve from friends, relatives and fans are the words of a classic extrovert. In that context, the criticisms of Jackie Stewart, Damon Hill and Mika Hakkinen must be viewed as what is seen looking at things from an introvert’s prerspective. If Hamilton were not able to tap into this external energy he would be a very different person indeed and probably not the world champion that we know.

    Secondly, as we’ve seen, Hamilton is a lightning rod for all sorts of opinions. I can understand likes and dislikes and that makes sense because all of us are attracted to some personalities and not to others. That’s just human nature. However, what is often different is the degree of vehemence associated with the responses.That’s what makes it suspect and gives rise to the thought of unconscious racism. Critisism and dislike is one thing, but ‘way over the top verbiage puts it into another realm.

  32. I was in a hotel restaurant on Saturday night in AD when Jenson walked in with his friends. ‘All hail fellow well met’ he was with a cheery, “Good evening everyone!” They went to the private room behind me to eat and have fun. Seemed a nice chap, even if for effect. a) No way am I going to go say “Hi’ in that situation, he’s out with friends and family before his last race. b) No way am I going to assume any insight into his personality based on 30 seconds interaction. People who base their opinions on what the papers say are starting from a way lower baseline than that – don’t understand why they get so het up on it.

  33. I have been involved in motor sport all my working life, 47 years. My enthusiasm for race car drivers is very much under control having worked with the very famous and those whose regard for their own abilities was far greater than their actual talent. In the 60s drivers were very much Team members, some even owning the team and car they drove, and they had personalities as variable as those of today. Successful drivers tended to be happy and approachable whereas the less so were more frustrated, grumpy and detached. Again very similar to today. However in the 60s/70s there was little in the way of celebrity in the way that stars are regarded, and protected, today, so the likes of Clark, Hill, Brabham, Gurney, Mclaren, Hulme etc were accessible and lived relatively normal lives away from the track. The advent of major sponsorship, TV coverage and a larger number of the ‘press core’ started the inexorable change to what we have today. There is no better place to witness how quickly a star of yesteryear has faded compared to the ‘legends’ of today than the Goodwood Festival of Speed. There one can walk through the crowds with ex-world champions, multiple Indy 500 winners, and winners of many grand prix relatively unrecognised only to arrive in the marshalling area to a large crowd, made up of minders and mechanics, surrounding a middle of the grid F1 driver there to demonstrate an F1 car for 30 seconds!

    At one such event my Japanese wife and I attended one of the dinner parties. We sat at a table of eight made up those who were demonstrating various vehicles over the weekend together with their partners, most of whom I did not know. Midori, my wife was dressed in full Kimono and so attracted a lot of attenion and she was charmed throughout the evening by a gentleman who sat next to her and who also took a great interest in all those around the table but said nothing about himself. When we got up to leave and said our thanks etc I looked at his place tag……………….Mr. Peter Brock. I have rarely met a more charming, interesting, humble and completely without ego race car driver in my life. I have never seen him since but compared to all the other drivers who have been part of my life he had one essential asset denied to all but a few and that is Class.

  34. Totally agree with what you said about the way PR/press managers decide on who to let interview the drivers. Years ago I was an F1 writer for a certain motor racing website and many times the first question asked when requesting an interview was about reader numbers/viewers per month/etc etc. They didn’t really care who you are, it was just about the numbers.

    I was fortunate enough to be granted most of the interviews I asked for (unusual for a website, I know – dunno if it was me being nice or because we had high enough numbers!) and again I agree with you about the public perception of the drivers and the real person.

    Seb is really funny (the first time I met him was at a media event and a very drunk German was trying to tell me a rather dirty joke. My German language skills are limited so Seb was translating for me and we couldn’t stop laughing). I can understand the send off Felipe got in Brazil from the other teams because he’s such a sweet guy and so enthusiastic and bouncy you can’t help but love him.

    The first time I met Michael Schumacher he made me laugh so hard, which I wasn’t expecting – it was at Silverstone testing, long story – Nick Heidfeld was one who maintained eye contact and was really engaging, even Juan Pablo Montoya, who had quite a bad reputation for press back then, was lovely, so funny and charismatic.

    So, yeah, the public perception is quite different from the real thing. Fair enough, as somebody already said, the only feedback most people get is from TV or rather bland interviews, or angry radio messages, so that’s the only thing they have to form an opinion on. But it’s easy to be an armchair critic and with social media nowerdays everyone seems to think they have a right to insult anyone and everyone.

    Sorry, went off on a bit of a rant there :-p

  35. Thanks for the interesting blogpost and the insights you provide here in general, Joe.
    My own experience with public image comes from politics. As it happens I know a formerly quite popular German politician since my childhood days as she and her husband are long term close friends with my parents. When I first saw her in German TV I was utterly shocked. The very charismatic and witty person I knew came along rather condescending and harsh being interviewed. After some more TV appearances I learned that she obviously had some kind of media personality in these kind of situations, in which you obviously can get attacked often quite fiercely.
    I can imagine the drivers having the same thing going and understand, why a guy like Vettel doesn’t want people to come too close. In longer German TV interviews I got the impression that he’s a quite funny, very down to earth, likable guy where as in short English F1 interviews he comes across way less sympathetic. While I really can’t guess, how Hamilton is on a personal level, the public image he actively promotes of himself through social media is quite atrocious to me. He has compared himself to Rosberg more than once as himself being something like the working class hero while Rosberg grew up as the rich kid. Now he actively broadcasts himself living the totally detached rich guys life 24/7. It seems like he really needs to show his riches and famous friends for whatever reason he might have. So I can’t say that I don’t like Hamilton because I really don’t know him personally. Maybe he had his reasons for sending out team data on twitter and the like. I’m not a Rosberg fan and although some people commenting here think we Germans still need to compensate for lost wars I really cheered when Button won his title. But the image LH creates in public actively makes it hard for me to just value his outstanding skills behind the wheel. He often comes across so superficial. I wish he’d concentrate on being a racer. Because his racecraft is sometimes breathtaking and I’d love to see him battle it out with Verstappen in the rain in identical cars.

Leave a comment