Notebook from nowhere in particular

My apologies, but the last few days have been very busy, writing 18 hours a day and, of course, flying home from Brazil. Then I had to try to get the hotel in Sao Paulo to give back money to which it helped itself without my permission – and without telling me. The justification for this was so obtuse that they needed an hour to work it all out, which meant that I was a bit later getting into the traffic jams and thus the check-in queues. I found myself behind a group of people who could only have been a band on tour, what with the black leather, tattoos, piercings and pigtails. I discovered that yes, they were a band on tour. Yes, they were heavy metal. Yes, they had been talking some funny languages, identified as Norwegian and Hungarian, and, yes, they were rushing back to Europe to play this week with the Oslo Philharmonic,(Yes, really). Not being an expert in Norwegian black metal, I asked the name of the group and was told Satyricon. I was none the wiser, but had an interesting chat comparing the lifestyles of F1 and Norwegian black metal.

“Where did you play in Rio?” I asked.

The guy shrugged. “I dunno. When you are on tour, you get to a hotel, you get in a van, you do a concert…”

Ah yes, that I understood…

It is true that when one is on the road, things tend to blur into each other. Every street in Sao Paulo looks pretty much the same, we agreed, when lost on the way to the circuit one day. In many ways Brazil is a great country, and in others it is incredibly sad. The other day, when discussing the future of the Grand Prix, someone suggested a street race in Rio. I am still giggling about that one. If you read the newspapers, you will know that last summer the Brazilian government sent 10,000 security people, including 8,500 soldiers into the city to try to stop a wave of crime, following a sharp increase in gun battles between the police and drugs gangs. A few weeks ago there were days of intense fighting between different drug gangs, trying to win control of one of the city’s favelas. In comparison, Sao Paulo is a positive utopia, even if politics has become something of an Ealing Comedy (Carry on Corruption?) with suitcases filled with money being handed over to go-betweens in pizzerias, before being delivered to the top level officials. This is why the country is undergoing Lava Jato, otherwise known as Operation Car Wash, a scandal surrounding industrial scale bribery and corruption concerning Petrobras, the national oil company and a celebrated F1 sponsor. This is serious stuff when one considers that a Supreme Court Justice handling the trials died in January when a plane he was on, crashed into the sea for no apparent reason… Of course, when your society is corrupt from top to bottom, it is hard to fight against criminality at all levels. And this is what F1 walked into last weekend.

Brazilians are generally a pretty friendly bunch and Interlagos is a great race track, steeped in history. Just up the Avenida Senador Teotonio Vilela from the main gates of the circuit there is a purple store called Stoc-Car Bar e Lanches, which was once old man Barrichello’s hardware store. A few doors further up from that, next to the China Box takeaway, is the original headquarters of the Fittipaldi Formula 1 team, where they built all the cars from 1974 to 1979, up to and including the F6. However between Interlagos and the inner suburbs of Sao Paulo, where the F1 folk stay (it takes too long to get to the centre of town), there is a road that heads downhill towards the smelly Jurubatuba river. It is a dodgy area and people with guns regularly pop out and try to steal things by pointing their weapons at the unfortunate passers-by. F1 people have been attacked in this neighbourhood for years and one would think that the race promoter and the city would want this to stop as the purpose of the Grand Prix is to create publicity for the city, not tell the world that it is a home of hoodlums. But no, nothing is ever done in advance, if someone is attacked more police appear, but they don’t always stay very long.

So, I suppose that being robbed by a hotel is a little more subtle than having someone stick a gun in your face, but it is probably not the way to win stars of excellence from worthy bodies who judge these things. By Monday F1 was pretty fed up with this and Pirelli and McLaren announced that they were cancelling a planned test and going home early. And here’s the funny thing, Brazil is paying Formula 1 for this kind of publicity…

Still, the word on the street for some time has been that the relationship between the race promoter and Formula 1 is right up there with the joyous love-in between Israel and Palestine. I am told the whole thing has been getting very silly with the promoter refusing to allow a Rolex clock into the paddock unless someone paid for it. It all sounds like it is building up to a right messy divorce, which probably explains why F1 seems to be very keen to get a race going in Buenos Aires, as quickly as is possible. For the record, it seems that the no-one wants to promote the Brazilian race beyond 2020 when the current contract runs out. The word is that Tamas Rohonyi Kertesz, the man who heads the promotion company, is leaving Brazil to return to his native Hungary. Rohonyi is, of course, a major ally of one BC Ecclestone, not to mention being a neighbour as Rohonyi owns (or owned) a coffee plantation near Amparo, to the north of Sao Paulo. Ecclestone visited the farm some years ago, liked what he saw and duly bought a 200-acre coffee plantation (as you do…) called the Fazenda Ycatu, and he has since started marketing its products as “Celebrity Coffee”. The word recently has been that Rohonyi has sold his plantation to Ecclestone and is getting out of Brazil. I don’t know if that is true, but they are close, Rohonyi being the man who introduced Mr E to his wife-to-be Fabiana Flosi, who used to be on the staff of the race promotion company at Interlagos.

But maybe the time has come for F1 to think again about Brazil. It is the sport’s biggest current TV audience (by a long way) but there are no guarantees for the future. The retirement of Felipe Massa at the end of this year will mean that there will be no Brazilian driver on the grid for the first time since the Dutch Grand Prix of 1971 when Emerson Fittipaldi was missing having been injured when a French driver on the Cote d’Azur did an unexpected u-turn and Emerson was smacked-up in the ensuing shunt.

Actually, upon reflection that is not true, because I don’t believe that there were any Brazilians present at the San Marino Grand Prix of 1982, when only half the field turned up because of a boycott, which was part of the infamous FISA-FOCA War, a battle over commercial control of the sport between the federation and the F1 teams. Later, of course, FOCA’s leader Bernie Ecclestone separated the teams from the rights they had won and made them all his own…

The world has moved on and those who think we are going back 35 years to the same kind of fight are dreaming. The sport is now so big that no-one can consider breaking it up. It would be suicidal and would cost a fortune and the offers that will be on the table from Liberty will be sensible, if not generous. They are in the game to make money, but their idea is to do it in a logical way, working with the team and the other stakeholders. The days of divide-and-conquer are over and, as a listed company, their ability to have special deals with the likes of Ferrari is pretty minimal. If they do that, what is to stop a Williams shareholder suing Liberty because his team does not have a fair share of the revenues?

Ferrari has taken a fair beating for suggesting that it might quit the sport if it doesn’t get what it wants. The response inside the sport has been fairly clear. Off you go folks… The manufacturers want to preserve their advantages, but they are not going to throw themselves on the Ferrari bonfire unless it really makes sense. And it doesn’t. On top of all this I seriously doubt Sergio Marchionne is going to pull Ferrari out of F1. He is up to his neck in things that are much more important. He’s trying to keep Fiat Chrysler Automobiles on the right path. Thus far he has managed to hit all his targets and has collected vast (some might say obscene) bonuses as a result. Recent revelations indicate that by the time he leaves FCA in 2019 Marchionne will own shares in the company worth $325 million. He wants to keep the share price high as a result of this and is looking for a partner with which to merge the business, but there is a nasty little scandal brewing over labour deals struck by Chrysler with the powerful United Automobile Workers. These, it seems, were achieved by bribing the union representatives and the FBI wants to know whether Marchionne knew about it. It certainly helped the company enormously. Faced with such things, the F1 problems of Ferrari are really not that important…

One should also consider one other thing that may have an impact. In Italy there are two sports that the nation follows: football and Formula 1. As we were flying home from Brazil on Monday, Italy failed to qualify for the 2018 World Cup, being knocked out by Sweden. It was the first time in 60 years that the nation did not make it to the competition, which it has won four times and been runner-up twice. For many Italians it was a complete disaster. The manager was sacked (of course) and the media spoke of it being the darkest moment in the country’s sporting history. Now, imagine how well Marchionne would fare if he pulled Ferrari out of F1…

One of the goals of the new engine rules is to attract new manufacturers and while we are fairly sure that Aston Martin and McLaren will have their own engines in 2021, we are waiting to see who else may appear. There are rumours of Alfa Romeo and there is still much talk of the Volkswagen group, with its portfolio of brands. For a long time the word has been that Porsche will come to F1, but in recent days there has been a big switcharound in the management of the various brands and the suggestion that the brand strategies will change. Wolfgang Durheimer, who has played a big role in the company’s motorsport strategies has stood down from his role as boss of Bentley and Bugatti. The latter brand will now be led by Stephan Winkelmann, who was previously in charge of Audi Sport GmbH and Volkswagen Group boss Matthias Mueller is looking for ways to give the company’s brands more individual identities. At the same time Ferdinand Piëch, the architect of Volkswagen in its current form, has given up his influence in the company, passing on his shares to his relatives. An era has ended. It is interesting to hear that Bentley may soon have a new model called the Barnato, named after Woolf Barnato, the celebrated Le Mans winner back in the 1920s. Bugatti is planning a new model called the Atlantic, after the famous sports cars of the 1930s but the brand is now going to move down-market a little, to reach a wider audience. Could motorsport be part of that strategy? Logically it should be, Bugatti was always about the sport…

Elsewhere Lamborgini boss, former Ferrari F1 chief Stefano Domenicali, is planning a hybrid supercar for his brand. He’s keen to take Lamborghini back into F1. Could that also happen? Technology sharing is all the rage this days…

In the paddock in Brazil, the word was that Williams is going to go for Robert Kubica next year, as team-mate to Lance Stroll. We will have to see if that is true, but the one thing we know is that Robert has the passion to do it. This means that Pascal Wehrlein and Daniil Kvyat are going to be out of F1 because it looks like Sauber will announce Marcus Ericsson and Charles Leclerc as its drivers for 2018, leaving Ferrari protégé Antonio Giovinazzi out of a job. Sweden will once again beat Italy…

It’s not confirmed yet but it makes no sense at all. Ericsson has been overshadowed this year by Wehrlein, but the team’s anonymous Swedish owner seems keen to make the same mistake many have made before him. While a team owner is entirely entitled to spend his money as he wishes, employing a driver on the basis of his nationality, rather than on his ability is a bad idea. It demotivates the staff, who want to be excited by the drivers and it impacts on the team’s potential earnings.

Passion was evident at Scuderia Toro Rosso as well over the Interlagos weekend, with Franz Tost getting rather hot under his collar and saying unwise things about Renault’s engine supply, suggesting that the poor reliability is deliberate and that Renault is trying to nick Toro Rosso’s sixth place in the Constructors’ Championship. Renault was less than impressed by this and Red Bull’s Helmut Marko later made a statement saying that there has never been a question about Renault being unfair. It was slap down for Tost and one wonders whether there might be longer term implications because Franz’s black-and-white way of seeing things may not help if he is dealing with Honda next year. Franz has always been passionate and enthusiastic, but this can get you into trouble in F1. For the last three years at least he has confidently predicted that the team will finish fifth in the Constructors… The real story has been 7th, 7th and 7th. Following that logic, the team should be seventh this year as well – behind Renault. We’ll see in Abu Dhabi.

Finally, there is a note in the green book about Netflix having some people in the paddock in Brazil, taking a look at F1, with a view to future streaming deals… interestingly this week there has also come word that Amazon has grabbed the British rights to the US Open tennis competition, to add to its earlier deal to stream coverage of the ATP Tour, following on from an deal to show NFL games in the US. It looks like Amazon is on the prowl for sporting content and has money to spend…

188 thoughts on “Notebook from nowhere in particular

      1. Is there anything to rumours of Kubica bringing 8million in budget? Patrick Head was on Sky talking about tight budgets at Williams and Massa has said the engineers know the truth.

    1. What’s so awful about it? They use the Sky TV feed from Britain. I find it very high quality. Certainly light years better than NBC.

    2. But the TSN Canadian coverage is SkyF1, with 10 + hours of coverage over a three-day race weekend. What’s so “awful” about that?

      1. What is awful is the commercial breaks (content, timing, duration), the scheduling, the random decisions of which races to show practice form, etc.,
        Also, there are usually no repeats for people who missed the actual race.
        compared to the Sky coverage, TSN does a horrible job.As soon as I can subscribe to Sky’s feed (or perhaps F1 direct) via the internet, the happier I shall be.
        Oh, and need I mention that I have to buy a basic package, a sport package, and then an HD package to watch the awful job TSN do? In reality it costs me around $800 a year just to watch races that are scheduled badly, interrupted by inane commercial breaks at badly-chosen times… it is pretty obvious no-one at TSN actually understands how people want to watch the sport they love.
        Compared to hockey, football, etc., F1 is really not well served by TSN and I would much rather pay c.$500 per annum direct to be able to see Sky’s coverage direct…
        Hopefully you’ll understand now why it is awful in my opinion…

      1. In Australia we get the UK Sky coverage on Foxtel. All FP1, 2 & 3 with a brief into and outro, quali & race with an hour before & after both.

        A full race weekend is around 9 hours coverage so not sure I will complain about that.

        I hear people complain about Simon Lazenby, Pinkham, Crofty, Brundle, Ted and the others and think Channel 4 (??) with Webber & DC are better- I cant comment as we don’t get that coverage but personally I think the Sky guys and girls do a great job.

  1. Italy are 4 time winners of the World Cup – 1934,1938,1982 & 2006.

    Nice touch with the Union story and Sergio, I wonder if wears a Trilby on unofficial business.

    As to his bonuses of 350 odd million being a staggering amount, why did you not mention the obscenity when Ron Dennis sold his share in McLaren for equally ridiculous amounts?

    After all, Ron only had an F1 team and a nascent sports car brand, whereas Marchionne runs a multi billion dollar empire..

    I guess it’s the Ferrari angle?

    1. No, Dennis owned the business and built it up over a long time. Marchionne never owned anything. This is bonuses.

      1. Am a little mystified Joe.
        Marchionne’s bonuses are ‘obscene’ but it is OK to domiscile in Monaco and register a dozen companies off shore to avoid paying the VAT as required. And then we preach to the brazilians about their lawlessness.

          1. Robbing in order to eat is bad I agree. But avoiding tax when you’re rich, where does that register on the moral scale……?

                1. If you hold up a guy with a gun, without a gun, the chances are that he will shoot you. But you are obviously an expert in gun-stealing so I bow to your superior judgement

                2. …….and they steal the guns in order to rob other people
                  so as to buy illegal drugs in a very high proportion of cases.
                  So the romantic theory that it’s all done to feed the starving
                  masses of Brazilian Favelas might just be true in a tiny
                  minority of cases. But when it comes to drugs in Brazil….
                  …whew !

                  1. Joe- I have been to quite a few GP’s over the years and been ‘guests’ of Red Bull, Mercs & Force India (Guests meaning paid them a heap of money) and when we ask what tracks to go to and what ones to avoid they say don’t go to China, too hard, and also Brazil. Their thoughts are that the police ignore the robberies and take their cut as a bribe as long as no-one gets hurt.

            1. One has to be careful when discussing morals. People defraud the state all the time, to a lesser or greater degree. Who doesn’t want to avoid paying too much tax, particularly when anyone working in the private sector sees how much is wasted in the public sector?

        1. @Al Bryn – there a British billionaires living in Monaco avoiding far more tax than Lewis Hamilton. Unlike Philip Green, little of Lewis Hamilton’s income comes from the UK and none from the pensions of his former employees.

        2. So… what, it’s a sacred duty to give as much of your money to the government as possible?

          Nothing Hamilton (there, I said his name) did has yet to be deemed illegal, just “not quite cricket”, I believe is the phrase. It’s been a common practice for UK citizens for decades.

          Perhaps, if the UK / EU taxes are perceived to be onerous enough that it’s worth leaving the country if you’re rich, perhaps those tax codes should be revisited.

          I’m an average, middle class American who pays taxes (and probably pays more of them than the current chump-in-chief), but I assure you, every year, I find every single deduction I can claim legally, and I take it. Does that make me a bad person?

              1. Some people like to share with those in need.

                But you’re not alone, everybody is selfish, it’s a survival mechanism.

    2. Are you dense or just trying to wind people up for the sake of it? McLaren as it is today essentially is Project 4. McLaren International was incorporated in Sept 1980 and that is the company which continues today. Therefore being a company that was founded by Ron, he is of course entirely entitled to sell his shares for whatever the f*ck he wants. It is not and nor has it ever been a public company beholden to public shareholders. His demise came about as a result of falling out with other private shareholders of the business and they asked him to sell his shares. He sold them for fair market value. They may be staggering to you, but to Ron they are a lifetime of blood, sweat and tears.

      Marchionne on the other hand did not found his company and is a mere employee of the organisation with a vision to grow it in a corporate way. His bonus(es) should be and can be scrutinised as they are of a publicly traded company. However if he has entered into contracts with is bosses (the board) who have given him a set of targets that he has met, then why should he not be rewarded?

      1. The question is, has he built up the business, or has he just played with the accounts to make the numbers look good on paper? This isn’t just about him personally; there’s a real problem with the relationship between actual and reported business success, and it’s making the old saw in economics about separation of ownership from control increasingly salient.

          1. Considering he is an employee of a lister company it’s a quite frankly absurd / disgusting amount for one mans bonus.

    3. SyracuseVerse,
      “why did you not mention the obscenity when Ron Dennis sold his share in McLaren for equally ridiculous amounts?”

      How much did he get?
      Whatever it is I don’t see how it’s an obscenity- something is worth what people will pay for it, no one was forced to buy!

      Maybe it as $billion- meh- who cares, he’s earned it!

      1. Marchionne and Ron Dennis are a little different I think. We don’t know of course but rumors of Ron’s share purchase buy out was something like $200-300 – Euro or Pound…. not sure?? Either way Ron’s family will want for nothing for 6 generations if they unless they put it all on red on black in Vegas.

        Do remember Ron Dennis took over McLaren in the late 70’s or early 80’s (Joe will know more here) so has built up one of the best & most successful F1 teams of all time- McLaren & Williams as ‘privateers’ or non-manufactures have been are worth every cent.

        But if Marchionne can get those sorts of bonuses, well, best luck to him- well played!

  2. Great stuff – sad to see no Brazilians in F1 but the trend was going down for a long time with generations where the best were world champions (Fittipaldi, Piquet, Senna) followed by generations where the best were race winners (Barrichello, Massa) followed by generations where the best were points scorers (Nasr, B.Senna etc.)

    The Italians would point out they won the World Cup 4 times not 3 🙂

    1. That’s an interesting point Diogo and something I never realised. There has been a downwards trend in the quality of Brazilian drivers until we now have reached a point where there are not even any Brazilian drivers on the grid anymore. Following on from that, if that were to remain true it would appear to make logical sense that the Brazilian GP will disappear from the calendar eventually. Certainly, from the behaviour of the race promoter described by Joe in the blog, they aren’t doing themselves any favours either. It would be a shame, because it’s a great track. The one bargaining chip they have is that it attracts the biggest audience of the year.

    2. Could this trend be related to a decrease in the lower level motorsport e.g. karting, single seaters, etc. in Brazil? I had a conversation with a Brazilian guy recently who suggested the overall amount of motorsport had decreased (but he also said he was not an expert and admitted it was more of an impression rather than based on solid evidence!) Any knowledgeable Brazilian posters out there who could enlighten?

  3. Joe, what are your thoughts on Kubica’s abiities now? I’m excited to see him back, but I have to wonder if he’s as good as he once was.

    1. He is not yet confirmed but if he is there it is because he has proved he can do it. Can he be the same as before? No I doubt it.

          1. You doubt that he’s the same driver as before and I can assure You that he can be even better now. He’s mentally and physically stronger than before

  4. A great notebook, Joe.

    Sadly things might not be that much better in Argentina. On the PPRuNe pilots’ Rumours & News forum there’s currently a rather alarming story about an Air France crew who ended up being detained overnight (with the purser being locked into a one metre square cell with no food, water or seating) for refusing to give an upgrade to a young woman… who turned out to be the Argentine Deputy Justice Minister’s daughter. (She went onto claim that the passenger next to her had been harassing her, but significantly she only mentioned that once her upgrade had been refused…)

  5. It will be disappointing if Antonio Giovinazzi doesn’t get a full time drive next year, but seems that’s the way it is going to go!

    Tost’s reply back to Renault were full of fire weren’t they!! I am sure the Honda guys would be thinking “Great- we are working with him next year!”
    While I know they are battling in the constructors I also cant help but feel RBR were behind it in some way to ensure they get equal equipment if the works team makes improvements next year!

    Did you get any free tickets to any heavy metal concerts Joe? 🙂

      1. Cyril with the coincidence opened the door.
        Tost’s response was a cracker. Well done him.
        And BPG, RBR can’t have been behind it, they have the TAG difference…..

  6. Hey Joe, I’d pay you to ask these tough questions that all media seem afraid to ask, unless you know the reasons yourself?
    1. Are Williams seriously not getting enough Money from the Strolls that they have to make the 2nd driver choice money related? The Money they are getting and Spending on Stroll is an eye watering figure when you consider all the Private testing he gets that no other driver anywhere is getting. Factor all this with 5th Place in the Constructors and Martini sponsorship, what is the justification and sense in still chasing the money? They yearn for the glory days again but with this approach they are surely never going to come.
    2. For Toto Re Pascal Wehrlein.. Why is Toto suddenly pushing Pascal out in the cold and not only not doing all he can to get his young charge that he’s invested heavily in a well deserved chance in a points scoring car but he’s prioritising George Russell over his head and getting him an immediate 3rd driver at Force India job? How is he more promising than Pascal in formula 1 terms. I won’t knock George before he’s been given a chance but thats the point he’s unproven and he’s been given a great chance ahead of Pascal who has proven and showcased his talents in DOGS of cars. How is 1 point in a Manor on a day where 18 cars finished that race in Austria 2016 not a stunningly impressive job? and then the small ( sarcasm) more like amazing job of dragging 5 points out of the WORST car on the grid with a year old engine not proof enough that the man has talent and deserves a chance? Why is he not banging Williams’s door down with a reduction on engine costs providing they take Pascal, a proven points scoring machine that will counteract the risky move that would be in Signing Kubica ( who apparently brings 8 million euros) Why doesnt Toto offer 10 million to take Wehrlein? Heck he payed that for Bottas who is proving a disappointment. What more does Pascal have to do to merit a midfield car? Win in a Sauber? Beyond ridiculous. and Plus Paddy Lowe knows Pascal’s qualities otherwise he wouldn’t have been entrusted with development and testing of the 4 time world champions cars regularly and for so long? So whats with the reluctance and hesistation from both of them? Pascal is the future, 23 years young, plenty more time to get even better, he’s the most reliable points scoring machine with raw pace and marvellous achievements in bad cars. So Stroll riches, solid constructors money, Martini Support and a proven star talent with raw speed with the ability to drag remarkable results out of dogs of cars and with it a reduction on the priciest thing in the sport, the Engine, how is this not good enough? Could you please ask this in the Abu Dhabi press conference if you don’t have the answers?
    3. and the same to Ferrari re Giovinazzi and especially to Vasseur, a team boss who’s supposed to be the most respected leader, who knows what talent is from his time in Junior formulae and yet he’s prioritising Ericsson? Why? Why aren’t Ferrari pricing Ericsson out? I’d greatly appreciate if you could answer in this blog or to ask at the Relevant Press conferences, many thanks.

    1. 1) Williams needs more money. 2) Competition is tough and Pascal has had more chances than most. I agree he should be st Sauber next year but money talks. 3) if you don’t own the team you are not the boss. Fred will own a team one day, but until he does refer to answer to question 2. Money talks.

      1. But Santino’s question is ‘why are the likes of Merc and Ferrari not using their considerable financial muscle to bring more money to the table to ensure their respective proteges continue their upward trajectory in F1?’. It was less than 12 months ago when Wehrlein was in serious consideration as Hamilton’s teammate. He appeared to be at a similar level of performance to Ocon, and one need only look how well the Frenchman is fairing in competitive machinery.

        Wehrlein’s beaten yet another teammate this season despite rumours (possibly unfounded) of the other side of the garage at Sauber being given preferential treatment – yet is being overlooked for a decent ride.

        His drives in the Manor were akin to those of a certain Alonso in a Minardi, where the driver was getting the car in places it had no right to be.

        Looking from the outside in, it appears that perhaps the Stroll money is also dictating who Lance is up against next year – better to take on a once great driver who is likely to be shadow of his former self than another rising talent that would in all likelihood put Lance in the shade.

        This hardly demonstrates F1 being the meritocracy that many purport it to be.

        1. Least you get it Bob, thanks, put it better than I did. Joe, I take it you won’t ask Toto these tough questions because what he’s your friend? The only reporter with some balls to ask tough questions that upset people is Dieter Rencken, what is your answer to Bob’s comment? Pascal has had 2 chances and he’s made the most of both of them. Everytime there was a chance to score points he was there to take them. I understand the money at Sauber but how is Strolls money not enough for Williams? what would they fold without him? Wehrlein would come with more financial incentives than Massa did in 2017, so why was it workable in 2017 for Massa who brought next to nothing in £££ and yet its not with a financial package from Merc for Wehrlein in 2018? Humour me, whats not enough, what number becomes enough. Williams are an embarrassment compared to Force India, look at the sterling job they do on even less of a budget and they aren’t hiring a Stroll. Sure Perez plenty of money but then they go with a a driver solely on talent an Ocon/Russell, so if Force India can do that why can’t Williams? Maybe Stroll is even the richest driver to have graced F1 in terms of what he brings rather than what he makes by the end of his career…

          1. I answered your questions based on conversations I have had. I don’t need to ask them in public. The fact I don’t do it in public shows not that I am a lousy journalist but that I don’t need to grandstand and big myself up. I ask questions so that I am the only one who gets the answer, which few people can do and whichis what smart journalists do. I was taught that by my first editor. Otherwise everyone gets the same answer as everyone else, including all the lightweights and bottom feeders. If I ask public questions it is because it is the only chance I get, or because we are having fun. It’s got nothing to do with balls and the fact you think that shows a complete lack of understanding of what journalists do.

            1. I loved your DR impersonation in that sparsely attended press conference a few years ago, very funny!

              On a side note regarding press conferences, how on earth does the officious note-taker manage to understand the name and publication, when invariably garbled as a virtual “first name-last name-publication” portmanteau, normally in what sounds like the thickest and most impenetrable foreign accent possible?

            2. I’m sorry but the last I knew was you provide a service to the PUBLIC and not just yourself. Picking and choosing what you tell. Eddie Jordan somehow gets things out of people, who despite him going public with clearly everything he’s told, people still confide in him. Providing someone isn’t abusive, it is your job to ask questions for the people who can’t. Honest Journalists tell ALL the facts, not just what they select to marry in with personal friendships or personal opinions. Its clear you like another British Journalist know who’s driving for Williams in 2018 ( he admitted he was sworn to secrecy) but because someone has asked you and him not to tell, your not and you prioritise that over your readers/followers. Why bother? you may as well just be like Moko, the eternal paddock presence, pick up information and keep it to yourself because when you don’t tell stuff when you know it, your effectively going to level of others you criticise. Boloney.. making out you don’t know. A few blogs ago you were all support for Pascal, now its ah well he’s had his chance. He’s made the most of his chances, so that point you make is rubbish. You haven’t answered any of my questions, given no numbers, refusing to disclose what figure it is Williams are after, refusing to disclose why Toto is suddenly prepared to end Pascal’s F1 career. Refusing to disclose why he’s prioritising George Russell over Pascal, despite Pascal performing admirably and being part of the family longer than the 5 minutes George has. Which of those questions have you answered? None. You just stated the obvious Williams need money, well durr the dumbest of the dumb can figure that out. It has everything to do with balls because journalists like Jeremy Paxman for instance ask questions that make those being questioned uncomfortable and that is why he has a strong reputation.People know him for his tough ways yet he still got more interviews, time after time. If you asked questions no one else does, people would flock to you for having the balls, being creative and fearless and getting answers that aren’t the standard PR mumbo jumbo. I and most intelligent souls know Williams need money but you don’t answer how much will tip the scales in favour of so and so and why Force India can put faith in 1 raw talent and not rely on 2 pay drivers, yet Williams cannot. Anyone would think I’m asking for an inside leg measurement, or your bank number. Why F1 is dying, secrecy and hypocrisy compared to other sports that give loyal fans all information they want pretty much. These teams and manufacturers and you forget we are the ones that make it possible for them to compete.

                  1. As I said you don’t understand what bring a journalist is. Nothing I can do to help you. If you font get it, you don’t get it.

                    1. I do. You just don’t understand that. I’m sure there are other websites better suited to you. Why not go there and stop insulting me.

                    2. Joe, I’m surprised enough that you put up with me… but this guy?

                      Perhaps you’re giving him plenty of rope to hang himself… if so, that goal was achieved several of his posts ago… please spare us from any more of them…

                    3. Agree with RShack – irrespective of whether any points raised are valid or not, there’s being critical and non-sycophantic and then there’s being confrontational and rude. That line appears to have been crossed here..

    2. Interesting support for Pascal, somebody who I personally never rated particularly.

      Considering his supposed pedigree, he neither destroyed Harayanto, at Manor, nor Ericsson this year. Both drivers who have never been claimed as potential champions in waiting.

      Perhaps most significantly, Joe wrote what I consider one of the best quotes in modern times. About Werhlein searching the fields around Interlagos last year because Esteban Ocon had blown his socks clean off during the wet Brazilian GP..

    3. You’ve really answered your own question. You have not just to be a talented driver but have many other attributes as well in order to succeed in F1 nowadays. Money has always talked and always will, it isn’t simply a meritocaracy. There have been numbers of talented juniors who haven’t made it at the top level notably Magnusson snr and Verstappen snr. It is also why Raikkonen and Bottas are where they are, adequately quick and a safe pair of hands. Interesting hearing Jenson talking recently, how nearly he was to getting dumped after his first William’s season, enjoying himself too much.

        1. We’ve heard that Nico Rosberg aced their engineering aptitude test.

          Perhaps Paul di Resta aced their dour and gloomy test?

  7. “the response inside the sports has been off you go”. this is not what I have read from inside the sports, what I have read from inside the sports was ” who in his right mind wants to invest and do business in F1 without FERRARI.

      1. Could be, we will wait and see what the outcome will be, what we really know so far is that what LM is going to put on the table up to now is several millions short of what was managed before.

        1. > we will wait and see what the outcome will be

          I do hope so. Perhaps Ferrari could withdraw from F1 just for one year, so that we see how terrible it is without them and we all have to beg them to come back.

          Everyone knows that Ferrari have all the negotiating power here, and it’s only a matter of time before everyone accepts that and offers them everything they ask for.

          Actually, this all sounds strangely familiar. You’re not David Davis writing under a pseudonym, are you?

          1. Toleman fan, Sunny Stivala is my real name. well like it or not, we will have to wait and see what the final outcome will be, because, “who in his right mind wants to invest and do business in F1 without FERRARI?”

    1. Okay then. The response from the fans, from what I have seen on all the available threads, has been overwhelmingly “off you go then – and close the door behind you.”

  8. Joe, how come you can cram more insight and knowledge into a ten minute read than Sky manages in about a million hours of programming over a Grand Prix weekend?

    1. Very simple, because JOE’s site is the best by a very long mile in the race between friends of the British F1 sites.

    2. I intended to watch FP2 last Friday afternoon to try to understand race pace. Croft and de Resta, droning on and on about nothing in particular, had me soundly asleep within 20 minutes. I woke and turned off after an hour having learned nothing.

      As you say, invest just 10mins with Joe and you suddenly become considerably wiser.

  9. Given the sorry state of security in Brazil, has it not occurred to the megabuck teams to hire their own? The bill for escorting team members to and fro the track can’t be that much…

    1. Rshack,
      “Given the sorry state of security in Brazil, has it not occurred to the megabuck teams to hire their own? The bill for escorting team members to and fro the track can’t be that much…”

      I was wondering about this one myself.

      I don’t know what the Health and Safety culture is like at Mercedes (would an incident in Brazil come under British or German HSE?) but the idea of members of staff being shot at is going to cause big issues if it’s anything like my company.
      At my blue chip engineering firm We just had an apprentice stick his hand in a lathe and get fairly minced. As a result we’ve employed H&S people and sorting out the legal and H&S mess is proving a full-time job for some.
      With Merc’s budget I’d imagine the opportunity for armed guards is not going to be missed!

  10. Great post Joe.

    I very much hope the answer to this is no but the post made me curious, have you ever fallen victim to any sort of crime on your F1 travels over the years?

    It seems like there are some interesting times coming for F1 we haven’t had a good old political fight in quite a while.

    1. What is a crime? Lots of magazines never paid me. That’s a crime. I’ve been threatened by people. But otherwise, not that I can remember.

    2. I’ve never had a gun pointed in my ear when racing but been shot at elsewhere but some years back I parked the team van right by the security post at the paddock entrance at Ricard to attend a team briefing and came out to find the door facing the officials not 10 metres away had been levered and everything worthwhile removed. Of course nobody saw a thing !

  11. Kubica, It all depends on someone else popping-up with a bag containing more then 8 million Euro.
    “Fairly sure that Aston Martin and McLaren will have their own engine” First I am surprised you left out the red bullies, Ilmor and Cosworth names. secondly, since when sticking a plastic sticker to the valve covers gives rights to claim “their own engine?”. And let us assume either that LM’S backward chaining as regards the future of F1 engine to help those that have neither the know how nor the resources to compete sticks, and that the present manufacturers are still around, how are these hopeful newcomers hoping to compete against the vast gained combustion technology experience of the present four manufacturers?.

    1. Did you built or bought your own house?
      It just does not matter who developed and built the engine. It is about its rights and who owns the rights. He who owns the rights decides what to do with it. If that is having a ‘third’ company on the valve covers for a big sum of money, than well, that will happen..

      Developing a new engine from scratch is probably a lot more expensive for the third party. So, basicaly, a win/win

  12. Dear BRDC, We at F1 would like to continue coming to your wonderful, safe, Silverstone Circuit. As we know that all of our teams will be safer there because, as far as we know, there are no armed gangs operating out of Towcester or Brackley. love Chase.

    1. The BRDC is a gang in and of themselves. They run the wild west that Silverstone. Lots of old school gangsters are part of the membership.

      It would be very inward looking to only race at Silverstone / Britain.

      1. You’ve been listening too much to Bernie. The BRDC is largely made up of actual and ex-racers of all ages and denominations. Pretty broad church.

  13. Joe, do you know anything about Koreans interested in building an 2021 engine? Korean GP was small disaster, but Korean brands (Samsung, Kia, Hyundai) made enormous progress in recent years. They seem to be more flexible and open minded than Japanese so why not?

    1. Samsung’s CEO was arrested recently and put in prison for 5 years on bribery charges. Is that the progress you mean?

  14. Every sporting series/promoter needs its anchor teams to give it identity and heritage. FIFA: Brazil. The FA: Man Utd. NASCAR: Petty. Time and again I’m reminded of Todt’s comment in 2003: ‘What is F1 without Ferrari? Super-F3000!’ They might be more adept at making lemonade on a champagne budget, but Ferrari pretty well doubles the number of non-automotive sponsors in the Paddock Club these days… all by itself.

    Funnily enough, in the years before the series launched, the FIA was extremely keen to ensure that Bluebird was a part of Formula E. It was one of a very few teams with electric expertise and it allowed the proposed series a link to heritage and great feats of derring-do. Of course, Bluebird was dropped like a stone once Flavio’s mates got the run of the series and Renault hopped on the bus – but at one stage they were all set to become the ‘Electric Ferrari’ and build customer cars in a large part of the old Lucas plant at Cowley.

    1. You mention NASCAR and Richard Petty…. NASCAR with Petty was small potatoes compared to what NASCAR became long after his retirement.

      Yes, Richard Petty is a NASCAR icon… but his success was no substitute for the smart biz practices NASCAR has deployed since then…

      As for what F1 might become once they act like a smart business and stop paying Ferrari insane money for showing up, well, we’ll have to wait and see. But if they were to keep up the same Ferrari-favoring practices, they’d be at risk of facing RICO charges…

    2. @scarf&goggles – Should Man Utd or any of the other big name Premier League teams stop winning, they’d be out of their ear at the end of the season and would have to prove their ability to return to the top ranks. It wouldn’t matter how big their bank balance was or their past history.

  15. Joe, is there any news on Sauber being renamed or be heavily sponsored by Alfa Romeo for next season.

    there was news going around this summer saying they are considering doing this.

      1. oh such a shame, i was really hoping the Sauber engine was going to be rebadged as Alfa Romeo and have sponsorship. Would really help the marketing for Alfa. I do think Sauber will improve next season anyway.

      2. What is the point of Sauber keeping their name now, beyond just the heritage aspect?

        Can they not even attract a cheaper Williams / Martini type deal, or are the new owners so loaded they just don’t need to worry about raising slightly more money?

        Come to think of it, why are none of the Tetrapak empire brands more prominent?

        1. What would be wrong with keeping the Sauber name? It worked just fine for Brabham and McLaren. That kind of brand continuity could be preferable to the likes of Jordan or Stewart who after multiple name changes are now (for the time being) Force India and Red Bull. Personally, I will take Minardi over Toro Rosso any time!

          1. It’s different when the heritage name has a winning history behind it.

            If you’re going to attach value to a name like Minardi, it’s like wishing we still had Arrows trundling round the back and embarrasing Damon Hill!

            Jordan actually had value as plucky underdogs everyone could cheer on, plus the personality of Eddie Jordan is far better suited to team owner than pundit.

            1. McLaren did not have a whole lot of winning heritage when Bruce died and certainly was not terribly viable when Ron Dennis stepped in. Yet, the name was kept each time and became iconic. Similarly, Brabham was past its heydays after Sir Jack quit, but Tauranac and Ecclestone both kept the name, although it ultimately did not end so well. Today, I don’t think that Red Bull would be worse off if their car was named Stewart RB13, nor Force India with Jordan VJM10. Admittedly, it would get more complicated if Mercedes AMG raced a pair of Tyrrells, but that just is unfortunate. As for Minardi…why exactly is an Italian translation of Austrian based energy drink company better?

              1. “McLaren did not have a whole lot of winning heritage when Bruce died” – could I refer my learned friend to the Can-Am series of 1967, 1968 and 1969 ? In those three series they swept almost all the opposition away.

                You may argue that this is outside of F1 but, back in the day, F1 teams and drivers were far more keen to ‘multi-task’ than is the case today.

  16. Thanks again for your notebook Joe, always look forward to it.

    Interesting to read about Amazon. With the infrastructure TATA has I’d have thought they would look at doing an OTT service themselves, but perhaps they would prefer to piggyback on top of Amazon’s codebase?

    Either way I can’t see it making the slightest bit of difference in the UK until the Sky contract comes up for renewal, and even then the BBC should be given first refusal.

  17. JOE, I see a post of mine went missing, I know what goes or not is your Prerogative but there is only two ways about it, either it being not liked, or it being offensive, please which one?

    1. I have no idea. I deal with hundreds of these things every day and don’t have time nor desire to figure out stuff like this. Police yourself.

  18. Hey Joe, thoroughly enjoyed kicking back with you at departures – your time and stories were much appreciated! I’ll see you in Knightsbridge for your Audience With… Cheers.

  19. Joe, My apologizes, I hope to manage to catch you before you let my post in, it was my bad, my mistake, my misunderstanding about a post of mine not being let true, again apologizes.

  20. The gist I got from the Toro Rosso-renault spat before the media decided to stoke the fire was not so much that Tost was saying that Renault were sabotaging them as much as saying there was a shortage of engine parts and Renault was keeping new stock for themselves while the customers were getting refurbs.

    Not direct sabotage, but not the customer service you’d expect from your engine supplier. Everything else just seemed like media hype and chinese whispers.

    1. Whatever the intent of the spat, I think that the number of grid penalties that Renault engined cars have served this year (350+] does not bode well for McLaren making a great leap forward next year, when they have only 3 engines to play with.

      I think that only 3 engines will probably mean another runaway WCC for Mercedes. Albeit with some close races with RB and Ferrari when they get fresh engines.

        1. Among your colleagues in the Media Center, how would you characterize expectations about whether Toro Rosso will be glad vs sad about their switch to Honda next year?

        2. Currently about 57% of the WCC points they needed to win and complaning about power deficiency.

          Having used 6 x ICEs so far and also, arguably, the best driver pairing.

          McLaren will overachieve if they can beat RB to 3rd position next year.

      1. That’s not certain at all. Ferrari have done nearly as well as Mercedes with both engine reliability and race pace.

        Eliminate Vettel’s mistakes and assume they’ll improve their whole package, and they could be the dominant team next season (obviously they won’t because Kimi…).

        Plus as Joe implied above, Red Bull have managed to negate the Renault problems by and large. With the investment in their works team, there’s no reason to doubt the Renault engine won’t improve both performance and reliability next year.

  21. Tosts outburst was only a reaction to Renault pointing the finger at Toro Rosso for the failures of the MGU-H, for which there is (imho) no foundation as Renault (or RBR) have about as much MGU-H failures this season.

    Wise? May be not, but at least it is understandable.

  22. “In Italy there are two sports that the nation follows: football and Formula 1.”

    …while quite true, there is also a certain Mr Rossi that the nation follows too, and let’s not forget the Giro d’Italia.. ;0)

    Very enjoyable and enlightening read, thank you.

  23. Joe, I’m sitting in my in-law’s flat in Shanghai, having just flown from Newark, USA with United, your favorite line.

    They’ve lost nothing in their apparent disdain for the customer. We’re it not for the fact that the offer a non stop, and was able to get it for free…. And I still may have overpaid. Once on board the experience was fine, but everything around that, not so nice. Clearly profit over service.

    On another note, I took your advice and got IQ but Joe Ide. Didn’t read much before doZibg off for the duration, but the opener is gripping. Thanks for the tip.

    Youay recall I brought an F1 virgin to the audience in Montreal. He was enthralled and we’ll be back this year, both to the race and the audience. Nice work!

    Thanks for all that you do. Mike

  24. Hi Joe,

    Thanks once again for your Notebook. As always, your blog is top notch.

    I am disappointed to read of all of the robberies (at gunpoint) of the F1 folk in Sao Paulo. There is no excuse for this, and the powers that be need to step up and deal with it. I am hoping to go to Interlagos next year. Of course, there is always a risk of things going awry when traveling to a foreign country, especially if you do not speak the language and are unfamiliar with the customs and culture. So if you decide not to travel to some place on that basis, you are denying yourself the opportunity to embrace and enjoy the fascinating cultures, customs, and heritages afforded by foreign travel. That said, there are countries one would be crazy to travel to, North Korea being one such country and Syria being another. I read that Sebastian Vettel will not take part in the ROC this year. I wonder if that is because it is being held in Riyadh. So for Sao Paulo and places like it, I guess that one needs to be street smart and maintain situational awareness. Carry only items that you can afford to lose. Keep valuables at your accommodation. Of course, if you work in F1, you will need to carry tools of the trade such as expensive photographic equipment, and that security is required, although it seems even that is not enough in Sao Paulo.

    I went to the Mexican Grand Prix last month and thoroughly enjoyed it, and I was apprehensive before my trip to Mexico City. The massive police presence around the track made me feel safe in the event. However, crossing the street in Mexico City is literally a hit or miss exercise. Safety in numbers and cross with the locals are the best policies there. Also, avoid using the metro during rush hour, and use Uber instead. It’s a right old punch up, and I got serious burns on my right forearm when it nearly got trapped in the fast closing sliding doors (no sensors it seems!) as I made a late but unwise decision to jump on a train, when all I had to do was wait for the next one.

    Speaking of metros, don’t forget to validate your ticket on the Budapest Metro. The Budapest transit police are not to be messed with as I learned to my cost when I traveled on a paid but non-validated ticket (I had missed the validation machine at the departure station – long story). The transit police will cut you no slack. I was caught at the main metro station, which is under the main railway station with said non-validated ticket. After some argy-bargy, I wisely decided to show my US passport card (keeping my primary passport secured) and settle with them for a little less than US$30, which was better than getting banged up in jail in a foreign country.

    Finally, I wonder if anyone has encountered an issue with taking an SLR camera and an assortment of lenses to any race circuit as a spectator. I was warned not to take mine (it’s a Sony A77 with 28-300mm telephoto lens) to the Spanish Grand Prix last May as I may be prevented from bringing it in. In the event, the threat did not materialize. However, on the Friday of the Mexican Grand Prix, as I was entering the circuit, one of the security officials told me “No professional cameras” after I had opened my camera bag for inspection, observing the telephoto lens. He told me to check it in at the “cloakroom” tent. I dug my heels in and refused, preparing for a return trip to my digs to drop it off. However, he surprisingly backed down, let me pass grumbling that “We’ve been told not to allow professional cameras. Thanks for your co-operation”. So on the Saturday and on the Sunday race day, I left the SLR behind and took my little Cannon point-and-shoot. I do wonder why “professional cameras” would be banned. Would it be for safety reasons to stop people getting the backs of their heads banged by some clumsy amateur photographer (such as me) with a telephoto lens, or is it because the professional photographers in the media do not want the competition? I do wonder. Certainly, my photographic equipment would not provide any serious competition.

    Keep up the good work Joe!

    Cheers,
    John

    1. With regard to DSLR’s, I have a Canon EOS 5D MkII and have taken that with a 35-350mm lens to both the Malaysian and Canadian races, and a 300mm 2.8 with a 1.4x converter to Spain. I’ve never had any issues, and I’ve seen people (mainly Japanese and Chinese if I’m honest) wandering around with 600mm F4 lenses. (Those things cost about 16K GBP…) I also went to the Indycar in Toronto with the same kind of gear without any problems.

      I agree about people been whacked, as I’ve almost done it myself with a 600mm lens at a different kind of sport, but you have to be careful! It’s when you are trying to take photos between two sets of catch fencing and there is somebody in front of you with an official lanyard and using something like a bridge camera (or worse, in Canada) that annoys you…

    2. I’ve just been to the race. You need your wits about you in Sao Paolo that’s for sure. Be very wary when checking out the centre of town; best to only visit in the morning / lunchtime. From then on it gets v dodgy – my mate and made the error of walking down Brigadero to Catedral de Se when the sun was getting lower. Jeez what a scene – like Night of the Living Dead. We asked a cop the best way out of it and were advised in no uncertain terms to leave immediately – it was only 4pm. Yet a couple of nights previously I was happily wandering alone up various streets in Bueno Aires at 2am with zero hint of trouble.

      Also – the area around the track is… interesting. Not a problem really in bright sunshine with thousands of fans milling their way back to the metro (a good mile or two away) but don’t linger, keep your wits about you and your watch etc well hidden. Sketchy doesn’t begin to cover it.

      Bizarre that the sport can encompass locations as widely diverse as Monte Carlo Casino and the abject desperation of Sao Paolo’s favelas. Sadly, I think Liberty need to have a long think about the race’s future…

  25. thanks for another great blog Joe, you don’t need to start with an apology, we appreciate you taking the time to write it!!

  26. I’m cautiously hopeful Netflix do get the rights to F1 streaming. We’re stuck with the overpriced Foxtel offering here in Australia. However, I guess there’s always the chance that Netflix would simply up their rates as well..

    1. Everybody has their own preferences. Personally, I don’t want to have to subscribe to Netflix…

      I’m hoping for a direct-with-F1 commercial-free option for ~$100/year. (I assume they’ll contract to use somebody else’s infrastructure… )

  27. Notebook interesting and elucidating as usual – thanks. I was looking forward to your observations after reading a strange and thinly veiled attack on Liberty’s performance to date, not just the security situation outside the circuit, in the Autosport Plus part of their website, written by a supposed experienced motor sport commentator, contributor and “racing driver”, so was interested to see if his report was reflected in any way in your notebook.

      1. Give me a steer to a reputable all-encompassing motorsport website (all formulae, saloons, WRC, Nat rallying, MotoGP etc) for the same price and I’ll change! I’m afraid we motorsport fans/enthusiasts are at a distinct disadvantage when it comes to trying to navigate round the lies, damn lies and statistics, to say nothing of the PR orientated commentating that we can sometimes see through, but not necessarily without some guidance – which is why I come here. Would love to subscribe to your motorsport business journal, but £££!

  28. @Mr Saward,

    what are your thoughts on the Argentine GPs 95 to 98?. I remember as a young teenager attending the last 2 GPs, last one inside the track and the atmosphere was overwhelming and an absolute joy. Lots of knowledge in Buenos Aires about F1 and racing, and I think it was never as dangerous as Brazil security wise, though not great at all in that respect nowadays either.
    Track was a bore to race (not to drive I think), but looks like the new layout using the old track would look ultra high speed.
    Anyway, would love to hear your thoughts if you’d fancy the idea, or else would be like any other place for you or F1 folks. I know attendance would be as always, the likes of Mexico today.

    Cheers.

      1. Personally, I would like it if F1 opened with Argentina and Brazil in January.
        Argentina, needs to be on the 3.6 mile track not the short one!

        Perhaps, F1 can go from January to October. Keeping a short window will force the teams to be challenged to put out new cars within the lead time.

        1. Letting F1 have any kind of life, of course, doesn’t matter to the fans, but it is a problem. Teams struggle to keep staff because the calendar is now so intense.

  29. I still maintain VAG will not do F1 for at least a generation Diesel gate and the pursuit of electric power will see to that

  30. If Ferrari left the sport and all of their fans left too, that would be a serious problem, wouldn’t it? Not saying any of this will happen, but their fan base is not something to ignore. I suppose people will argue that if you’re willing to stop watching, then you’re not a true fan. I know I’d be much less likely to follow the sport without them.

      1. I would, if it’s suddenly going to cost me ten times as much to continue coming 2nd, 3rd or 4th in the championships due to loss of special payments. I could spend Ferrari’s F1 budget much more effectively in other forms of advertising, without giving the impression that my cars weren’t as good as a Mercedes. Or a can of diabetes.

  31. The Oslo Philharmonic has been programming concerts with various types of rock band this year. They pulled off an especially spectacular concert with Spiritualized in the early summer.

    Unfortunately part of this involves the orchestra playing where the bands are playing, such as multi band outdoor festival events. This invariably compromises the sound quality, as well as other logistical factors. The concept would work better if the bands were coming to the concert halls the orchestra normally plays in, but you can’t have it all…

  32. The BBC have made a programme on their World News channel about the runaway chump. “Nico Rosberg: My Life After F1”. It was aired today and will be on twice tomorrow. It will be available on iPlayer in the near future.

    1. That sounds like it will either be very short or very dull.

      Personally I’d be more interested in a look back at his career in F1, since although I was following the sport through that period, he so frequently veered towards bland anonymity, I can’t really remember much of anything he did pre-2014+.

      Despite having such a forgettable personality, presumably he must have driven well enough to keep a seat for all those seasons – hence it would be nice to look back at his earlier F1 career.

      1. FWIW (which by rights shouldn’t be much), I thought he was underrated for years before he faced off with Lewis…

        Lewis was clearly better in the wet, and was clearly better at combat passing. But in F1 these days, how often do those things come into play?

        When it came to simply going fast on a dry track, it was pretty much a toss-up between the two of them…

  33. Seems like you forgot to mention that Tost was provoked by Abiteboul into saying what he did, making Renault look better. Abiteboul is not a good man for that team. He is way too arrogant and confrontational and makes silly statements which ignites debates like this. He seems to me to have slight psychopathic tendencies. Maybe equals attract?

  34. We’re hearing ESPN’s plans in the US will be to pick up the Sky coverage and show just the race — qualifying and practice streaming only. Sponsors won’t like that.

    Amazon’s NFL deal is a restricted deal because of the NFL’s long-standing FTA deals for streaming rights only. (All NFL matches must be televised on a local broadcast station in both teams’ primary markets, and that includes national/global streaming matches.) The USTA deal in some countries could get out of hand before we know it with sponsors. Sponsors will not want to be part of any deal where the most restricted paywalls (streaming is the most restricted paywall in the industry) are exclusive carriers. That lesson was learned in the American Le Mans Series, which effectively faded because of the streaming-only live coverage they offered in 2011 and 2012, resulting in Panoz merging with Grand-Am for the WeatherTech Championship in 2014.

    One thing that US fans are concerned is ESPN will not carry any anciliary programming with F1 the way NBCSN did, most notably feature-length programming with Will Buxton and pit producer Jason Swales.

    Netflix will raise their rates drastically if they carry sport. The primary problem with ESPN and subscription television costs relates to the increase in per-subscriber rates for sporting events. They raised their per-subscriber rates when they took over the NFL’s Monday night package, the CFP, the NBA, and USTA tennis rights. Each massive television deal results in a raised rate ESPN charges to subscription television providers. For example, Charter Communications’ Spectrum SportsNet and SportsNet Los Angeles is carried on all Charter systems nationally so Charter can rack up a per-subscriber charge to every subscriber, but only Los Angeles area markets can watch the channel’s primary programming (four sporting teams from the Los Angeles area). The same thing goes with two Major League Baseball-owned teams’ subscription channels, New England Sports Network (Boston Red Sox) and Yankees Entertainment Sports (New York Yankees), but they supplement their programming with regional outdoors programming, the college sports (no restrictions), and both magazines and highlights packages of Premier League teams (NESN with Liverpool, YES with Manchester City) with affiliation to both ownership groups.

    In fact, a report on the news is Netflix will keep raising rates on an annual basis as they switch from being a tertiary television and movie provider to becoming a primary source, since primary requires a heavy investment of fees they pay to studios in order to carry the shows. Any advantage the streaming services had as a tertiary provider will go away when they switch to a primary model. So if Netflix or Amazon Prime obtain F1 rights in the future, watch their rates go up drastically to pay for the service. Rights fees for sport are larger than rights fees from studios to carry programming.

Leave a comment