Epsilon aims for F1

Epsilon Euskadi says that it will be bidding for the 13th available Formula 1 “franchise”. The team was involved in a bid last year but lost out to Campos (now HRT), USF1, Manor (now Virgin Racing) and Lotus. This was surprising given the impressive facilities that the team has built close to Vitoria-Gasteiz, the capital city of the autonomous community of the Basque Country, in northern Spain.

The team is owned and run by Joan Villadelprat, who says that he was stuck in a classic ‘chicken and egg’ situation last year as the FIA wanted proof of the team’s financing and his sponsor wanted the guarantee of an entry before making a commitment.

From Barcelona, Joan first encountered F1 at Montjuich Park in 1971 and he immediately decided that he wanted to get involved. He worked for a while in the under-developed Spanish racing scene before joining the Equipo Nacional Espanol, a team that had been designed to promote young talent in Spain. The drivers were Fermin Velez and Jordi Caton and they raced Ralts in international Formula 3, against future stars such as Nelson Piquet, Alain Prost, Nigel Mansell and Derek Warwick. The money eventually ran out and Villadelprat moved on to the team that had impressed him the most in Britain – an operation called Project Four Racing, run by a young Ron Dennis. For the next eight years he worked for Dennis, switching to McLaren when Marlboro engineered a merger between the old F1 team and Dennis’s ambitious young operation. Those were great years with the McLaren-TAG combination winning three straight Drivers’ titles with Niki Lauda and Alain Prost. In 1987 former McLaren technical director John Barnard lured Villadelprat away to Ferrari, where he became chief mechanic. At the end of 1989 he was recruited by Tyrrell as team manager but after a promising season in 1990, the team had a disappointing year and Joan was then hired by Benetton. He quickly became Operations Director and went on to oversee two World Championship titles for Michael Schumacher in 1994 and ‘95. He stayed on until the start of 2000 but then went home to Spain with the aim of setting up his own F1 team in Barcelona. When sponsor Telefonica decided against the plan, Joan joined Prost Grand Prix as Managing Director. It would be a short-lived job. The team went out of business at the start of 2002 and once again Joan went back to Spain to embark on a new project. He formed an alliance with France’s Epsilon Sport to run a project in the Nissan World Series in Spain. The team was given the name Epsilon Euskadi and it was soon very competitive. In 2005 it won the series, which had been rebadged as the Renault World Series, with a young driver called Robert Kubica. Villadelprat then bought out his partners and teamed up with his old driver Caton, and Epsilon has been quietly expanding ever since.

Villadelprat’s policy has been not only to aim for F1 but also to lay the groundwork for future Spanish teams.

“Since we started Epsilon we have taken three or four guys each year from the technical high school and trained them to be mechanics,” he says. “If they have the right attitude, then we keep them. Now we have a Masters degree course, which is linked to Mondragon University. This is for graduate engineers who want to be involved in motorsport. So we are training new engineers all the time. That is part of the process. From the beginning of the project we were aiming to combine high technology and innovation with racing, education and an industrial element as well. When we started out in 2003, we bought one team and we slowly grew. We had young guys and we needed funding for their ambitions. The Spanish Ministry of Innovation was interested and offered suitable business loans to aid the development process. You apply and you get very good conditions. You get 15-year loans at very reasonable interest rates. We have two of those from the Spanish government. The local Basque authority was also interested and was looking to invest European Union money to create research and have things for them to do so we started another team. Then we said that we wanted to show the world that we could be a constructor. We did not have what we needed to do that and so we started thinking of how it could be achieved. We were not thinking about F1 at all. We wanted to build a suitable facility that could do all the things that we want to do.”

Villadelprat and Caton recruited top engineers Sergio Rinland and Henri Durand while also looking at ways to get government development facilities in its region.

“When we decided to build a sportscar for the Le Mans 24 Hours we began to look for customers and we had some lined up. Obviously the recession came along and the orders disappeared. We had the old factory but we broke ground on the new one in February 2008. At that time the whole world was not collapsing and the idea was to look at markets apart from Formula 1. There are lots of other categories and when you look at it there are only a handful of companies who can manufacture racing cars. We would like to have a percentage of that market.”

The Epsilon factory has cost around $60m to build and includes everything that a motor racing company could need, including a 60 percent scale rolling road wind tunnel.

“At the back of my mind I figured that the facility could one day be used for Formula 1,” Villadelprat admits. “If one day the sun and the moon are in alignment and there is a chance to go to F1 then we would take it. Although the recession slowed things down, as one door closed another opened.”

“What we have been doing is to slowly show people what is possible,” he says. “I started out when a guy wanted to set up a Nissan World Series team and wanted to get money from the government and asked me to be a consultant. From there we were able to convince them to help us create an industry. It started with the school for mechanics and engineers and was followed by teams and drivers. Then we created the Le Mans car, which was a product that we could sell, and now we are building a manufacturing base. We are creating an industry. Maybe it is not the right time to do this, but we cannot stop. We need to push on. I don’t know how long it will take, but one day we will be there in F1. I am convinced of that. We have the facility, the people, the know-how, the means and the tools to do that.”

Finding money for motorsport in Spain has never been easy, but Joan says that it is a very different story to find money for F1 rather than for the Le Mans 24 Hours.

“We have Alonso,” he says. “We have two Grands Prix. We have circuits and we have a lot of testing in the winter. F1 is important in Spain. It is really hard to get a penny for Le Mans, although it was a tremendous thing last year that for the first time a Spanish driver – Marc Gene – has won there. That got a lot of media coverage but we were there with the first Spanish-built car ever to race at Le Mans and no-one noticed. Pegaso did enter some cars back in the 1950s but they never qualified.”

Although the Epsilon did not figure strongly in the race, it was the source of enormous pride for Villadelprat.

“It is a question of mentality and education. I don’t know if it is politically correct to say it, but people in Spain do not think that we can do the things that we are doing. They think that we must have bought the wind tunnel second-hand rather than having built it ourselves. They think that you cannot do these things in Spain. That is what they do in England and in Germany, but not in Spain. We need to change that mentality. I spent years in some high places in F1 but it was never really noticed. Now things are changing, but maybe it is a question of timing. Maybe I was born too early.

“You have to open your mind and look at the opportunities out there,” he continues. “We have had windmills being developed in the tunnel and we did a project also to improve the efficiency of the football. We have other projects with customers in racing and with car manufacturers. Right now in Spain there are three or four roadcar projects we are helping. They are not very well known yet. We are open to any kind of business. We spent six or seven months developing the 2009 sportscar design so we will have to see what happens. We are talking to possible customers, but that largely depends on the economy.

“The important thing is that we keep going forwards. We have tremendous potential. We have people like Sergio and Henri, both of whom have enormous experience. We have a lot of good people. We can design and manufacture cars from Formula Ford to Formula 1.”

If you ask him about the people who have influenced him in his career, Joan is very clear.

“Ron Dennis,” he says immediately. “I admire him. He has been tremendous. I can call him a friend and he has always helped me. We have had fights too, particularly when I was running Benetton and he was at McLaren. People do not realise what he has done, starting from where he started. Not many people in the world have done that. I admire his way of thinking and his attention to detail. I believe in the same things. I had the good luck to be with him for seven years and I learned a lot. Sure, he has his negative points too but he taught me to work in an ordered fashion. When I went to Ferrari the team was a disaster. The youngest race mechanics were 50 plus and I was a 30-year old Spaniard trying to get them to change. I was the first foreigner to be the chief mechanic. I think I did a good job there.

“John Barnard really helped me to understand mechanical things. He taught me to find out the reasons for things, step by step, so that one could understand the problems. If I am a good mechanic, it is thanks to him. I moved to Tyrrell and we had some good people there, with Harvey Postlethwaite, Jean-Claude Migeot and we had a good year with very little money, so I got the experience of working with a lot of money and then working with very little. When I went to Benetton I was really running the team. I designed it, employed the people, created the team spirit. It was different to other teams. Flavio Briatore does not understand much, but if he trusts you he lets you do what you want. I learned from the mistakes I made there. After that I went to Prost and I found out how to lose. It was really lost before I got there, but they had everything that they needed apart from management. So what you see here is a result of a little bit of everything.”

The Epsilon factory is mightily impressive. It has been designed with all the departments in the right places, with plenty of space and light. It is huge and includes not only all the manufacturing and race team areas but also an upstairs section which not only houses offices but also allows people to see the whole facility below, without interfering with the way it is run. If there are visitors, they need not be disruptive. And it has been cleverly thought through. All the extraneous machinery has cunningly been hidden away inside the outer shell of the structure so that there is none of the clutter that one sees at so many F1 factories that have evolved over the years. Upstairs there is also the area where the Masters degree is taught. Villadelprat aims to produce graduates from the course who will be capable of running not only his operations but also teams of their own. It is a broad and impressive vision.




60 thoughts on “Epsilon aims for F1

  1. Impressive facilities for a non-starter aren’t they. Amazing. The masters program for graduates is another great idea, especially housed in the factory.

    This is good stuff – if they get approval to start I hope it’s early enough to produce something that does Epsilon credit.

  2. A travesty that EE is not in F1; EE is the Spanish team that should have got the license (no disrespect to Kolles & Carabante for what they achieved in two weeks is simply awe inspiring).

  3. If theyd agreed to use Cosworth engines theyd be in F1 now.

    As it is theyve missed their chance – well chances. Had they had investment in place theyd have had a shot against Lotus when it came to replacing BMW.

    As things stand we now have a Spanish team and really dont need a second. If HRT can pick up a few sponsors theyll be fine given time, if not then another team looking for money in the same places wont help anyone.

  4. Very interesting article Joe. I like how you have the freedom to write a couple of paragraphs on some smaller issues, and then have the freedom to really explore a story like this one.

    I wish I spoke Spanish … seems like a great place to work. I hope Villadelprat gets a shot at an F1 team, should be great fun to see what he could do with his background and that great facility.

  5. It does beggar belief especially when you contrast the images above with what we saw of USF1’s ‘operation’.

    Villadelprat has gone about it the right way, invested or sourced money to build up the operation so it is ready to go and he loses out to a startup which looks like it was only appointed as F1 needs the USA more than the USA needs F1.

    I’m amazed that the FIA turned away from Epsilon because they couldn’t prove their finances – how exactly did USF1 get around this?

    http://www.pitlanemagazine.com

  6. I guess they lost out, because Campos had Carabante, USF1 had Hurley and Epsilon was in their chicken and egg situation with a sponsor that didn’t want to commit. In hindsight it gets easy to say it should have been different, but if the FIA asked them all “How are you gonna pay for it?”, Campos’ likely answer would have been: “Hispania is gonna pay a large sum.”, USF1: “We’re bringing in Youtube” and Villadelprat: “Can’t tell you yet”. It makes a bit of sense, especially if you forget that ultimately things went a little different.

  7. Far out. From those photos there is some money tied up in that facility…….it seems a big fancy place for spending someones elses money. How can a company make enough profit to pay for that and employ enough people to fill it and utilise it and continue to be viable.

    “Finding money for motorsport in Spain has never been easy” …..looks like he found a motherload.

    Good luck to him, I hope F1 get a front running team out of it.

  8. If I were to guess, the FIA wanted to spread out their catch of new teams. Since they already had a Spanish team in Campos (now Hispania), they weren’t interested in a second Spanish team.

  9. Exactly the kind of outfit that should have been given entry last year over the likes of HRT and USF1.

  10. Because everyone was crazy with the idea of a US team and also because Windsor was saying the most overoptimistic bullshit ever said. Now why everyone took his word is another matter.

  11. Those facilities look pretty impressive Joe. And with a background as strong in F1 as you portray for Villadelprat, it’s not just surprising but suspicious how EE didn’t get to be on the grid this year.

  12. Maybe this bit’s a clue?

    > “Ron Dennis,” he says immediately. “I admire him.
    > He has been tremendous. I can call him a friend…
    >
    > …People do not realise what he has done, starting
    > from where he started. Not many people in the
    > world have done that. I admire his way of thinking
    > and his attention to detail. I believe in the same things…

    Suddenly a potential reason becomes very clear. Hopefully this time round that won’t be an obstacle, if indeed it was last year.

    Having only properly followed F1 from the early 90s, I only knew of Joan from his Benetton days, I had no idea he was an ex-McLaren man, thanks for the article, Joe.

  13. They lost out to USF1 because Peter and Ken talked up a storm and somebody bought it. Camaraderie is everywhere, also in F1.

  14. JamesF1,

    It’s quite simple, really. Surely we all remember the fine old motor-racing axiom — “Twenty years of experience and a McLarenesque technodrome facility and the backing to go racing across multiple formulae will always lose out to a couple of prats with no experience, no facility, and no money, but with big delusions, er, dreams.”

    I tend to dismiss conspiracy theories involving the FIA (and in general) out of hand, on the principle that the simplest explanation may or may not be the right one, but the most complicated explanation almost never is.

    But in this case I begin to wonder… How Epsilon, Prodrive and Lola could be passed over in favour of USF1, Campos and Manor is beyond me. Even if finances were the only criteria (and as I recall they were used to reject Prodrive as well, on the grounds that they had set up a special-purpose entity to apply for the entry, which was then denied on the basis that it had no financial history!) it boggles the mind that smoke and mirrors from USF1 and Campos would be preferred to a track-record actual results in the case of Epsilon and Prodrive.

    Ah well. That was in another country; And besides, the wench is no longer FIA president.

  15. Impressive Joe, I need not say much more than that, other than I think you may have put more effort in to research and writing this information than Mosley and the boys did when it chose USF1!!! Again thanks, you do, do your homework!

  16. Joe,

    That factory is amazing! I can’t believe that the FIA approved USF1 and Campos over Epsilon Euskadi or Prodrive. I hope to see Epsilon on the grid in the coming years.

  17. Because Bernie really really really really wants to tap into the millions of dollars American race fans have lining their pockets that current go nowhere near FOM’s piggy bank!

    In fairness I always thought USF1 was a good prospect and were looking good. But there are some questions to be asked about the whole tendering process. Too many excellent and proven race team builders lost out to what always seemed weaker bids.

  18. I was really disappointed to see that Epsilon did not make it to the grid this year.

    They were in a much better position than any of the new outfits.

    I think they would be even better than Prodrive/Aston Martin if they were granted grid slots.

    Let´s hope for the best. They are a team I will support from day one.

  19. Looks like an impressive operation, run by someone whose head is not bigger than his shoulders.

    Love the comment about Briatore.

    That they were rejected and USF1 were accepted beggars belief. Just shows how desparate they are to get any form of US involvement, no matter how badly qualified.

    I’d like Aston Martin to get the place, and if not them, then it looks like Epsilon are well placed.

  20. I second JamesF1 – This is how an F1 Team should be built. I’m sure somewhere in Charlotte there are people like Joan!!!

  21. They have to get it this year, i mean for goodness sake here is a team that looks far more impressive then any of the new teams an they haven’t even started yet.

    Jesi Chrisi, them or prodrive or its a sham.

  22. Ehm JamesF1, did you read the article?

    “… he was stuck in a classic ‘chicken and egg’ situation last year as the FIA wanted proof of the team’s financing and his sponsor wanted the guarantee of an entry before making a commitment.”

  23. equally amazing, to me, is how i missed all this kind of excellent pr whilst they were bidding last year?

  24. That certainly beats a single six-axis-milling machine, a empty warehouse with a photo of Jim Clark on one wall, and a wind tunnel full of toasters.

    I don’t wish anything bad on Virgin and HRT, but I can’t help but think the sport would of been better off by letting Epsilon Euskadi, Lola, and Prodrive come play instead of the new teams we got outside of Lotus.

  25. this team lost out to usf1 its just ridicoulus!!, those facilites are impressive..

    for a start ….3 autoclaves. vs a small one in usf1…

  26. Joe, great article. The news stories are great, but journalism like this is a precious commodity these days.

    @JamesF1 I’m in the states and I have to ask the same question about USF1 over Epsilon (Prodrive and Lola who had a 50% model in a wind tunnel in Sept. 2009 http://www.racecar-engineering.com/news/cars/396546/lola-unveils-2010-formula-1-car.html). My guess is it has to do with Nick Craw. The decision was probably made to create leverage for a US GP. It’s a sport, so when sporting decisions are made for commercial reasons, everyone seems to look a fool. This is no exception.

  27. I think they lost out to America because Bernie & the FIA saw dollar signs. The country that spends the most $$ on consumer goods would now have another opportunity to gain new interest in Formula 1 and spend some money on this sport.

    As an American I can’t help but feel embarrassment. How can the Formula 1 world not look us as a possible force when there are no decent driver development programs here, or a seriously vested team.

    Its amazing what people here are willing to put money/interest in as NASCAR and IRL and boring and more of a gimmick than quality racing. We are a country of sheep that run in circles…

  28. I found that insight very interesting Joe. Thank you.
    Like James F1 I’m puzzled how they missed out when the other two debacles got the nod.
    Of the new teams have to say only Wirth’s operation has any real credence, the others……. well certainly one of them is extremely opportunistic.

  29. Perhaps this was the problem:

    “If you ask him about the people who have influenced him in his career, Joan is very clear.

    “Ron Dennis,” he says immediately. “I admire him. He has been tremendous. I can call him a friend and he has always helped me.”

  30. Max has a lot to answer for.

    I am not sure what I expected of them but it sounds and looks like they are right on the ball and should definitely be in F1. I can see the attraction of a US team but if you have two Spanish teams one of which is run by someone who has run teams at the top of the sport and has all that this plant has and the other is run by a failed driver and has nothing then the decision should be a no brainer.

    I had no idea Villadelprat had worked for Ron Dennis and was so infuenced by him. I have no idea how I missed that.

    This is a great article Joe.

  31. Did the FIA (MM) not insist that the new teams use Cosworth engines? Epsilon Euskadi were not that way inclined.

  32. probably, political aspects… or economical interests…
    let´s see next opportunity. They´ll surely catch it and use it with “dignity” (= able to conclude races at least, not as HRT…)
    cheers

  33. They’ve got no staff in those pictures.

    USF1 had pictures of people working on laptops – much more substantial…

    Seriously impressive facility, but then so was Arrows when Walkinshaw ran it. And Stoddardt bought most of it for pocket change.

  34. I heard that these guys had some decent facilities but I had no idea they were this good! I am astounded at the facilities.

    I agree with JamesF1, how did Epsilon not get a spot? I welcome them!

    And along the lines of the chicken and egg thing – why was everyone so inflexible as to not allow a contract to be signed along the lines of “you get an entry and we will give you $x million” from the sponsor?

  35. Because they’re a spanish team. Carlos Gracia, president of “Federacion Española de Automobilismo” told recently that it was due to country issues.

    There wasn’t a possibility to have two spanish teams and Bernie choose Campos Meta. Why choosing Campos ? well, anyone can think whatever, but obviously it’s not difficult to think in economic terms and different kind of agreements like have Cosworth engine, for example.

    In other terms Carlos also told that the first idea of Villadelprat was to buy an established team, but he couldn´t achieve this. Villadelprat seems that doesn’t want to start a new team but buy an established one.

    Sorry for my bad english.

  36. Hola Joe hace tiempo que te leo aqui desde barcelona nunca se entendio aqui en españa como Epsilon no entro a formar parte de la f1 2010 esperemos que en 2011 puedan estar.
    un saludo

  37. What an integrated, progressive, and grounded approach. Not only as a gateway to F1, but as an inclusive organization working to promote the interests of their own national and regional base.

    What’s not to like about these guys?

  38. I think that what you posted was actually very logical. But, think about this, what if you were to write a
    awesome title? I am not suggesting your information is not solid, but suppose you added a title that makes people desire more?
    I mean Epsilon aims for F1 | joeblogsf1 is a little plain.
    You could look at Yahoo’s home page and watch how they write
    post headlines to grab people to open the links. You might add
    a video or a pic or two to get readers interested about everything’ve written.
    In my opinion, it could bring your blog a
    little bit more interesting.

    1. The whole point is that I am not out there fishing for readership. My headlines are deliberately plain. If people want to know what I am on about they will read it. I don’t care if they don’t.

  39. An interesting discussion is definitely worth comment. There’s no doubt that that
    you need to write more about this subject, it might not be a taboo
    subject but usually people do not discuss such subjects. To
    the next! All the best!!

Leave a reply to American_F1_Fan Cancel reply